Because the news cycle is in warp speed, please consider the following just sound bites along the way. Stating these things at this point along the way might seem a bit premature, and perhaps they are, but at the very end of this post you can see scientific proof of at least a measure of merit to consider as potentials along the way. Nothing more. Nothing less. Just a snapshot of thought in time. It may be interesting for some. Or not at all for others. One thing is for sure though, we are in the early timeframe of admin 47. As intro to this section, please consider what "tells" might be in place. For example, if we consider the following two brief articles, why are these judges so interested in gangs? This is not happening in a vacuum. And is something provided to see as context of our moment. Meanwhile in contrast we want to keep our thoughts within reason, and not think too far outside a box. But in sober minded consideration, what box with these judges are we actually too far out from? If this box is our current reality, and it appears to be it is, how might otherwise sound and reasonable observations of ours tame how we are thinking about things as though this is not the actual box we are experiencing to be in (we don't even have too be too far outside the box to already be outside the box of norm to begin with -- if that makes sense)? And to what extent might we posture to be reasonable in the land of the unreasonable?
A group of ICE agents and the migrants they're holding in Djibouti following an order by a U.S. federal judge are at grave risk, an immigration official says.
abcnews.go.com
. . . . .
A SURMIZING
Some things could be if theater, would seem to be the Big Beautiful Bill that might need a social touch for potentially better push through/relevance. And midterms. Which of the two, seems quite a bit more involved in how.
. . . . .
Elon's defection seems due to "not ALSO pulling subsidies for gas/oil as is with EVs + pork in the big beautiful bill." This makes sense if Elon thought his role in DOGE was emblematic of the trajectory he understood a Trump admin to take America. Feeling disillusioned by the bill. Maybe even used by Trump perhaps as a gimmick to seem like Trump was about America but then supports a typical looking (in Elon's view) pork bill. Feeling like we merely pretended to be America first, but really oil/gas doner class orientation and pork first. All the while, Elon taking hits for active Trump support (including what he risked prior to election day should Trump had lost--Elon's life would have been buried by leftist power mode retaliation). The caveat here possibly that as saturated as America is in the globalist infrastructure, we may not be able to get everything through a bill yet. Some old school some new may be a best shot at the current going rate of globalist infiltration (which has proven to be quite a deep deep state) we might best be able to manage at this point, perhaps. Trying to put through a lean beautiful bill would die on the floor most likely. Where are where we are at, unfortunately.
To that end, it would seem the left think Elon's economic hits taken recently, would currently now re-evaluate a want and need for the EV tax credits provisions. Perhaps feeling like the richest man in the world just got played by Trump.
. . . . .
THESIS
If there is nothing more to MAGA than a noble try (or worse: a cover up to further enslave America, but with a happy/hopeful face), then likely the best it can be is whatever pseudo--political reforms can grant America along the way (by appearance only) would be merely cosmetic patchwork on the titanic. Would government actually be about anything more than posing while it syphons power?
However, if MAGA fills a role in economic and sociopolitical honest facelifts (at least in part or in whole) for prophetic setting to empower Israel, then extreme game theory would of necessity to magnanimously be in play. Determining this outcome verses the "poser" outcome may be not the easiest wind direction of things to determine where they might be headed. We live in a day and age where each side of the equation sees in events what affirms our leanings.
I believe the most reasonable ways to consider what real trajectory looks like today, is in the consideration of what each potential outcome would look like along the way. With being deceived in general, granted, it does not take much...lol. But to consider the attributes of what the lay of the land would look like if American prosperity on some level become most true (or as true as might be even possible in our day and age), would be the harder course to discern if any merit.
To make things more complicated, we have extreme views on either side. Where those in the middle see those extremes (either of them: utter soon coming doom OR measure of temporary victory) as conspiracy theory. And each side of the extreme see its opposites to be reading way too much into things. Further, if either extreme, Beast System/Golden Age, have actual merit for today, it would seem fitting that there would be seasons of false flags, psyop, false starts, and over conjecture inherent all along the way if either extreme were to be true (even though one extreme might have more merit than the other). In other words, even where one extreme might be more true for our social moment, even there it might even have its ebb and flow of how apparaent that extreme be). PS -- By Golden Age I don't mean a real golden age. Just using it as metaphor for a short real season of prosperity potential not typically considered to go with the hunk of mess we all find ourselves in.
So in this sense the best i believe we can do is understand as much we might the possibility of either extreme as our moment. And weigh them out along the way. Not so much for the sake of being in the know, as much as developing a healthy sense of generic trajectory for our day. Which could be helpful in discussions with others in the level of relevance and sober minded thinking of things relating to the bible and are times, hopefully most accurately. And how that might aid believers in a number of ways. But also unbelievers in getting a best sense of our backdrop perspective when sharing the gospel.
. . . . .
We are in a world where there seems to be never ending things that could happen or may happen that is just around the corner. Any minute now. It could become a sense of purgatorying endlessly. However, we also know there are certain things that do happpen and are occurring. How to make reasonable sense in some cases are easier, granted, than others. This may be another endless rabbit trail, or it might be presumed discovery a new administration might have a sense about when potentially considering to improve things. This brief highlights what that could look like:
WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is following up on recent...
www.judiciary.senate.gov
. . . . .
I appreciate our forum as a place to consider and weigh things out as we travel together along the way during most puzzling times. Amen.
So in the start of this post, I mentioned the harder to consider would be how theater between Trump and Musk could have oars in the midterm waters. One reason i posted the above Grassley article is a demonstration of what things might look like during a new admin's views on where previous administration left things. And how waking up to all of that might look in the real world at that level. It is clear from Grassley that a lot of game playing went on. Hide and seek. Subterfuge etc. Understanding what that might actually look like, at best (for us), would be symptoms and ear marks in takes like Grassley expressed there.
So what theater with Trump and Musk could represent in relation to midterms is something one could only ponder if there is any real consideration there are good faith players in trying to pull America further away from globalist clutches.. But if the case, it would make a lot of sense in how to call out, track and monitor bad faith players imbedded within American agencies. Out of the 10s of thousands of workers in all our agencies, there will be sleepers, and there would be those not loyal to the USA. Pitting Elon and the Don would be one political theory that would make sense in sussing out some measure of bad faith actors in the many agencies. It would also provide a mood of capture. What do i mean by that?
If the political tone and mood is that America is arguing with itself and dumbed down (even at the--or especially at the Trump admin level), then bad faith actors feel less on guard. There are two ways big mistakes are often taken by opponents. When they are stressed. And when they feel at unreasonable ease. On the latter point, something interesting on the front (only in as much as it might be a potential), Kash and Bongino comes to mind.. Because if Trump and Musk are theater, then maybe so are Kash and Bongino. What would be shared in common is the mood sense of ease for bad players. Kash And Dan are dummies maybe even suckered to be blind regarding Epstein's death. And Trump/Musk are emotional neanderthals. Nothing to worry about.
If that seems far fetched, its understandable. But how do con men work? Then often work on presumption. Leading people to think and feel presumptively. Or the "yes" path in sales. Helping a customer think "yes, yes, yes" so as to bring them down a road to a presumptive conclusion. If said customer agrees with the salesman, it would appear he is easily led. Understanding one as easily led is the mirage the con man lives within. Like the WEF duping the world on all sorts of things. If they can get people to think this or that, the WEF is fortified in their belief that they have our minds and souls in their hands. And may be overly confident we are being led to the degree they think we might. Feeling confident in their guile. The problem there though is...the WEF, or the conman or the salesman abandons real world clarity on where people actually are. Because they are too busy believing how skilled their guile is. And that can be a huge blind spot.
So if the Trump admin has something regarding Epstein the bad faith players believe has been otherwise well hidden, Kash and Dan playing dumb and owned (and even sell that on TV) could be mood. Granted, Occam's Razor would call thoughts like this insane. And it may be that Kash and Dan and Don and Elon are just saps like the rest of us caught up in the wiles of life. And that is just how it goes etc. But as wild a theory as it may be, for instance, that Trump may have wanted Elon to bring up Epstein to garnish ground swell interest even from among the dems for support of its release (whenever that might be), it could be seen as easily demonstratable political science theory measurable. Because that is at least on one level, its outcome so far...
US News: House Democrats asked the FBI and the Department of Justice to reveal the truth of the Jeffrey Epstein Files and what Elon Musk claimed about Donald T.
timesofindia.indiatimes.com
My sense would be that the Epstein files if ever released to be like a trumpcard move. And not something we would see anytime in the near future. But something when the moment is right. Which we would have 0 understanding of because of such massive nuance all along the way. Way too many moving pieces. On a similar note, I would think one concern the left could have if Trump pardons Ditty is: All the things he'd be free to share in trade thereof.
Just some considerations from the peanut gallery along the way.
Blessings.
youtu.be
townhall.com
I'm quite sure you are right!
