What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

FINDING GOG

Andy C

Well-known
A Bible Study by Jack Kelley

(This is an update of a study I first posted in Nov. 2003. I’m posting it again because of the impressive rise of Vladimir Putin, who some have suggested could be the “Gog” of the Bible.)

Those who labor to understand the nuances of the battle described in Ezekiel 38-39quickly identify two major puzzles. One is the timing of the battle and the other is the identity of Gog, from Magog. Suffice it to say here that almost no scholar, certainly none I’m aware of, believes the battle of Ezekiel 38-39 has already taken place. Some believe it will occur just before the beginning of Daniel’s 70th Week, others believe Ezekiel is actually describing the Battle of Armageddon, which would put it at the end of the Great Tribulation, and a few believe it will take place at the end of the Millennium, primarily due to the mention of Gog and Magog in Rev. 20:8. But all place it sometime in our future.

In my opinion, there are several reasons why Ezekiel 38 can’t be part of the Armageddon scenario. First, only some nations are involved in Ezekiel 38. For example, Saudi Arabia and Western Europe are said to be on the sidelines observing and others you would expect to see, like Egypt and Jordan, are not mentioned at all, although both appear later on. But Zechariah 12:3 says that in preparation for the Battle of Armageddon all the nations of the Earth will come against Jerusalem.

Second, how is Israel going to burn the left over weapons for 7 years as Ezekiel 39:9indicates unless there are 7 years left in which to burn them? Rev. 21:24. says the nations will walk by the light of the New Jerusalem in the Millennium, so they won’t need fuel for energy then. And then you have Ezekiel 38:11 telling us that Israel will be a peaceful and unsuspecting people when the Moslem coalition strikes. Could that be possible near the end of the Great Tribulation when all the nations are gathering to attack? I don’t think so.

But most importantly, Daniel’s 70th week can’t start until Israel is back in covenant with God and the battle of Ezekiel 38 is what causes the covenant to be re-instated. (Ezek. 39:22) Armageddon comes at the end of Daniel’s 70th week, not the beginning.

As for Gog and Magog, the first thing to note is that while Magog is listed in Genesis 10, Gog is not. The list of 70 names in Genesis 10 is often called the Table of Nations because each of the men named there was the original ancestor of an ethnic group that grew to become a nation of people. For instance, Magog was the 2nd son of Japeth, one of Noah’s three sons, and bore the children who in time became known to the ancient world as the Scythians. They lived in central Asia and are believed to be the forefathers of today’s Russians. Many historical references support this view. For example, Josephus Flavius wrote “Magog founded the Magogians, thus named after him, but who were by the Greeks called Scythians.” And in some ancient Arabic documents, the Great Wall of China is called the Ramparts of Gog and Magog. It was built to keep the Scythians out of China.

So while the Russian people of today are likely descended from Magog, there is no such biological connection for Gog to either Magog or any other ethnic group. There is an unrelated mention of a man named Gog, a grandson of Reuben, in 1 Chronicles 5:4 but there doesn’t seem to be any connection between him and the land of Magog either. Clearly, while Magog refers to the millions of his descendants in today’s Russia, Gog remains a single individual.

Some say he’s a king or leader, and in a real sense I think that’s true but I don’t believe he’s of the human variety. The time spanned by his three appearances in scripture make that impossible.

The first one is in the first verse of Amos 7, but you have to be reading Amos from the Septuagint translation to see it. There, Gog is identified as a king, but of a swarm of locusts. To further shroud him in mystery Proverbs 30:27 states that locusts have no king, and observers of locust swarms agree that no obvious leader directs them, as a queen would direct a hive of bees for example. The swarm of locusts led by Gog in Amos 7:1-2 was symbolic of a judgment that was to come upon the Northern Kingdom, but the Lord relented because of Amos’ intercession.

(This hint also lends insight to another appearance of locusts, by the way. I’m referring to the one in Revelation 9, where a swarm of locusts comes out of the Abyss to afflict those on Earth who lack the seal of God on their foreheads. These locusts have a king named Abaddon in the Hebrew or Appolyon in the Greek. Here again, the Proverbs passage would indicate that these locusts are of supernatural origin like the ones in Amos 7, not ordinary locusts.)

The next time Gog is mentioned is in Ezekiel 38:1, where he is called by name as the leader of a coalition of what are now primarily Muslim nations attacking Israel. His final mention comes from the Book of Revelation where he again leads the people from Magog against the Lord’s army at the end of the Millennium (Rev. 20:8).

Even if you’re among those who place the battle of Ezekiel 38 at the end of the Millennium, the span of time between Gog’s last two biblical appearances is at least 1000 years, and while I believe that some born in that era will have long life spans, there isn’t any indication that natural humans born before the Millennium begins will live to see its end. This is especially true of God’s enemies, since all surviving unbelievers are removed from Earth at the beginning of our Lord’s reign.

So I’ve come to the conclusion that Gog is not a mere human, like Vladimir Putin. I think he’s a supernatural figure working behind the scene. The Bible clearly states that behind the human seats of government stand supernatural figures manipulating the thoughts and actions of the world’s leaders. These figures are in Satan’s employ, helping in his effort to wrest ownership of Planet Earth from its Creator. The Bible offers several examples of the supernatural forces behind human thrones. I believe there are enough of these to make it a general principle.

In Isaiah 14 beginning at verse 3 the Lord began a taunt against the King of Babylon. Then in verse 12 He identified this king as Lucifer (KJV) and goes on to describe his rebellion against God and eventual fall.

In Ezekiel 28 we see a similar situation with the Lord speaking first of the human king of Tyre and then verse 11, still calling him the king of Tyre, He began describing circumstances and events no human king has ever experienced. It’s clear He was again speaking of Satan.

In Daniel 10, the prophet wrote of a vision he saw in the third year of the Persian Empire while on a fast to gain understanding of prophetic events. In the 21st day of his fast an angel came to him apologizing for taking so long to reach him. He had been detained by one he called the prince of Persia and had to summon Michael the archangel for help in getting free (Daniel 10:12-13). Then in verses 20-21 the angel said he would have to continue his fight against the prince of Persia and after that the prince of Greece would come.

Angels cannot be not detained by humans, and whoever detained this angel was so powerful that it took Michael to free him. Also, the Greek Empire was still 200 years in the future at the time.

In Daniel 10:13 Michael is identified as one of the Lord’s chief princes. In Daniel 12:1we’re told that Michael will protect Israel at the end of the age. And in Rev 12:7 he’s seen leading the angelic host in a great battle in heaven when Satan is defeated there and cast down to Earth at the outset of the Great Tribulation. Michael is clearly a supernatural warrior leaping across the pages of history in defense of the Lord’s interests. It makes sense that Satan would have a military commander leading his forces as well, since everything he does seems to mirror the actions of his Creator. With his multiple mentions in Scripture and the long span of time between appearances, Gog could easily be this commander. Maybe it’s just an interesting coincidence, but one of the translations of Ezekiel 38:2 identifies Gog as the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal. That makes Gog the only other one called a chief prince in the Bible besides Michael.

Only time will tell if this view is correct. But one of the great advantages of living in our day is that we won’t have long to wait till we find out. You can almost hear the footsteps of the Messiah.

 
So I’ve come to the conclusion that Gog is not a mere human, like Vladimir Putin. I think he’s a supernatural figure working behind the scene.
This makes sense.

I’ll have to dust off Andy Woods’ book The Middle East Meltdown. From what I recall he places the Ezekiel war at the beginning or prior to Daniel’s 70th week. It stops before completion (breaks off to allow the renewing of Covenant, level of peace is in Israel) then the war resumes.

I hope that’s not confusing, because I should reread the book before I ramble on, but anyhow, he splits the war.
 
This makes sense.

I’ll have to dust off Andy Woods’ book The Middle East Meltdown. From what I recall he places the Ezekiel war at the beginning or prior to Daniel’s 70th week. It stops before completion (breaks off to allow the renewing of Covenant, level of peace is in Israel) then the war resumes.

I hope that’s not confusing, because I should reread the book before I ramble on, but anyhow, he splits the war.
MAybe this might save you some reading - https://youtu.be/p6ogURR3tag?si=qCDH8omy1lB2fkBiYouTube
 
A Bible Study by Jack Kelley

(This is an update of a study I first posted in Nov. 2003. I’m posting it again because of the impressive rise of Vladimir Putin, who some have suggested could be the “Gog” of the Bible.)

Those who labor to understand the nuances of the battle described in Ezekiel 38-39quickly identify two major puzzles. One is the timing of the battle and the other is the identity of Gog, from Magog. Suffice it to say here that almost no scholar, certainly none I’m aware of, believes the battle of Ezekiel 38-39 has already taken place. Some believe it will occur just before the beginning of Daniel’s 70th Week, others believe Ezekiel is actually describing the Battle of Armageddon, which would put it at the end of the Great Tribulation, and a few believe it will take place at the end of the Millennium, primarily due to the mention of Gog and Magog in Rev. 20:8. But all place it sometime in our future.

In my opinion, there are several reasons why Ezekiel 38 can’t be part of the Armageddon scenario. First, only some nations are involved in Ezekiel 38. For example, Saudi Arabia and Western Europe are said to be on the sidelines observing and others you would expect to see, like Egypt and Jordan, are not mentioned at all, although both appear later on. But Zechariah 12:3 says that in preparation for the Battle of Armageddon all the nations of the Earth will come against Jerusalem.

Second, how is Israel going to burn the left over weapons for 7 years as Ezekiel 39:9indicates unless there are 7 years left in which to burn them? Rev. 21:24. says the nations will walk by the light of the New Jerusalem in the Millennium, so they won’t need fuel for energy then. And then you have Ezekiel 38:11 telling us that Israel will be a peaceful and unsuspecting people when the Moslem coalition strikes. Could that be possible near the end of the Great Tribulation when all the nations are gathering to attack? I don’t think so.

But most importantly, Daniel’s 70th week can’t start until Israel is back in covenant with God and the battle of Ezekiel 38 is what causes the covenant to be re-instated. (Ezek. 39:22) Armageddon comes at the end of Daniel’s 70th week, not the beginning.

As for Gog and Magog, the first thing to note is that while Magog is listed in Genesis 10, Gog is not. The list of 70 names in Genesis 10 is often called the Table of Nations because each of the men named there was the original ancestor of an ethnic group that grew to become a nation of people. For instance, Magog was the 2nd son of Japeth, one of Noah’s three sons, and bore the children who in time became known to the ancient world as the Scythians. They lived in central Asia and are believed to be the forefathers of today’s Russians. Many historical references support this view. For example, Josephus Flavius wrote “Magog founded the Magogians, thus named after him, but who were by the Greeks called Scythians.” And in some ancient Arabic documents, the Great Wall of China is called the Ramparts of Gog and Magog. It was built to keep the Scythians out of China.

So while the Russian people of today are likely descended from Magog, there is no such biological connection for Gog to either Magog or any other ethnic group. There is an unrelated mention of a man named Gog, a grandson of Reuben, in 1 Chronicles 5:4 but there doesn’t seem to be any connection between him and the land of Magog either. Clearly, while Magog refers to the millions of his descendants in today’s Russia, Gog remains a single individual.

Some say he’s a king or leader, and in a real sense I think that’s true but I don’t believe he’s of the human variety. The time spanned by his three appearances in scripture make that impossible.

The first one is in the first verse of Amos 7, but you have to be reading Amos from the Septuagint translation to see it. There, Gog is identified as a king, but of a swarm of locusts. To further shroud him in mystery Proverbs 30:27 states that locusts have no king, and observers of locust swarms agree that no obvious leader directs them, as a queen would direct a hive of bees for example. The swarm of locusts led by Gog in Amos 7:1-2 was symbolic of a judgment that was to come upon the Northern Kingdom, but the Lord relented because of Amos’ intercession.

(This hint also lends insight to another appearance of locusts, by the way. I’m referring to the one in Revelation 9, where a swarm of locusts comes out of the Abyss to afflict those on Earth who lack the seal of God on their foreheads. These locusts have a king named Abaddon in the Hebrew or Appolyon in the Greek. Here again, the Proverbs passage would indicate that these locusts are of supernatural origin like the ones in Amos 7, not ordinary locusts.)

The next time Gog is mentioned is in Ezekiel 38:1, where he is called by name as the leader of a coalition of what are now primarily Muslim nations attacking Israel. His final mention comes from the Book of Revelation where he again leads the people from Magog against the Lord’s army at the end of the Millennium (Rev. 20:8).

Even if you’re among those who place the battle of Ezekiel 38 at the end of the Millennium, the span of time between Gog’s last two biblical appearances is at least 1000 years, and while I believe that some born in that era will have long life spans, there isn’t any indication that natural humans born before the Millennium begins will live to see its end. This is especially true of God’s enemies, since all surviving unbelievers are removed from Earth at the beginning of our Lord’s reign.

So I’ve come to the conclusion that Gog is not a mere human, like Vladimir Putin. I think he’s a supernatural figure working behind the scene. The Bible clearly states that behind the human seats of government stand supernatural figures manipulating the thoughts and actions of the world’s leaders. These figures are in Satan’s employ, helping in his effort to wrest ownership of Planet Earth from its Creator. The Bible offers several examples of the supernatural forces behind human thrones. I believe there are enough of these to make it a general principle.

In Isaiah 14 beginning at verse 3 the Lord began a taunt against the King of Babylon. Then in verse 12 He identified this king as Lucifer (KJV) and goes on to describe his rebellion against God and eventual fall.

In Ezekiel 28 we see a similar situation with the Lord speaking first of the human king of Tyre and then verse 11, still calling him the king of Tyre, He began describing circumstances and events no human king has ever experienced. It’s clear He was again speaking of Satan.

In Daniel 10, the prophet wrote of a vision he saw in the third year of the Persian Empire while on a fast to gain understanding of prophetic events. In the 21st day of his fast an angel came to him apologizing for taking so long to reach him. He had been detained by one he called the prince of Persia and had to summon Michael the archangel for help in getting free (Daniel 10:12-13). Then in verses 20-21 the angel said he would have to continue his fight against the prince of Persia and after that the prince of Greece would come.

Angels cannot be not detained by humans, and whoever detained this angel was so powerful that it took Michael to free him. Also, the Greek Empire was still 200 years in the future at the time.

In Daniel 10:13 Michael is identified as one of the Lord’s chief princes. In Daniel 12:1we’re told that Michael will protect Israel at the end of the age. And in Rev 12:7 he’s seen leading the angelic host in a great battle in heaven when Satan is defeated there and cast down to Earth at the outset of the Great Tribulation. Michael is clearly a supernatural warrior leaping across the pages of history in defense of the Lord’s interests. It makes sense that Satan would have a military commander leading his forces as well, since everything he does seems to mirror the actions of his Creator. With his multiple mentions in Scripture and the long span of time between appearances, Gog could easily be this commander. Maybe it’s just an interesting coincidence, but one of the translations of Ezekiel 38:2 identifies Gog as the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal. That makes Gog the only other one called a chief prince in the Bible besides Michael.

Only time will tell if this view is correct. But one of the great advantages of living in our day is that we won’t have long to wait till we find out. You can almost hear the footsteps of the Messiah.

This is a very interesting read. Fascinating. Thanks for posting this. Andy.
 
A Bible Study by Jack Kelley

(This is an update of a study I first posted in Nov. 2003. I’m posting it again because of the impressive rise of Vladimir Putin, who some have suggested could be the “Gog” of the Bible.)

Those who labor to understand the nuances of the battle described in Ezekiel 38-39quickly identify two major puzzles. One is the timing of the battle and the other is the identity of Gog, from Magog. Suffice it to say here that almost no scholar, certainly none I’m aware of, believes the battle of Ezekiel 38-39 has already taken place. Some believe it will occur just before the beginning of Daniel’s 70th Week, others believe Ezekiel is actually describing the Battle of Armageddon, which would put it at the end of the Great Tribulation, and a few believe it will take place at the end of the Millennium, primarily due to the mention of Gog and Magog in Rev. 20:8. But all place it sometime in our future.

In my opinion, there are several reasons why Ezekiel 38 can’t be part of the Armageddon scenario. First, only some nations are involved in Ezekiel 38. For example, Saudi Arabia and Western Europe are said to be on the sidelines observing and others you would expect to see, like Egypt and Jordan, are not mentioned at all, although both appear later on. But Zechariah 12:3 says that in preparation for the Battle of Armageddon all the nations of the Earth will come against Jerusalem.

Second, how is Israel going to burn the left over weapons for 7 years as Ezekiel 39:9indicates unless there are 7 years left in which to burn them? Rev. 21:24. says the nations will walk by the light of the New Jerusalem in the Millennium, so they won’t need fuel for energy then. And then you have Ezekiel 38:11 telling us that Israel will be a peaceful and unsuspecting people when the Moslem coalition strikes. Could that be possible near the end of the Great Tribulation when all the nations are gathering to attack? I don’t think so.

But most importantly, Daniel’s 70th week can’t start until Israel is back in covenant with God and the battle of Ezekiel 38 is what causes the covenant to be re-instated. (Ezek. 39:22) Armageddon comes at the end of Daniel’s 70th week, not the beginning.

As for Gog and Magog, the first thing to note is that while Magog is listed in Genesis 10, Gog is not. The list of 70 names in Genesis 10 is often called the Table of Nations because each of the men named there was the original ancestor of an ethnic group that grew to become a nation of people. For instance, Magog was the 2nd son of Japeth, one of Noah’s three sons, and bore the children who in time became known to the ancient world as the Scythians. They lived in central Asia and are believed to be the forefathers of today’s Russians. Many historical references support this view. For example, Josephus Flavius wrote “Magog founded the Magogians, thus named after him, but who were by the Greeks called Scythians.” And in some ancient Arabic documents, the Great Wall of China is called the Ramparts of Gog and Magog. It was built to keep the Scythians out of China.

So while the Russian people of today are likely descended from Magog, there is no such biological connection for Gog to either Magog or any other ethnic group. There is an unrelated mention of a man named Gog, a grandson of Reuben, in 1 Chronicles 5:4 but there doesn’t seem to be any connection between him and the land of Magog either. Clearly, while Magog refers to the millions of his descendants in today’s Russia, Gog remains a single individual.

Some say he’s a king or leader, and in a real sense I think that’s true but I don’t believe he’s of the human variety. The time spanned by his three appearances in scripture make that impossible.

The first one is in the first verse of Amos 7, but you have to be reading Amos from the Septuagint translation to see it. There, Gog is identified as a king, but of a swarm of locusts. To further shroud him in mystery Proverbs 30:27 states that locusts have no king, and observers of locust swarms agree that no obvious leader directs them, as a queen would direct a hive of bees for example. The swarm of locusts led by Gog in Amos 7:1-2 was symbolic of a judgment that was to come upon the Northern Kingdom, but the Lord relented because of Amos’ intercession.

(This hint also lends insight to another appearance of locusts, by the way. I’m referring to the one in Revelation 9, where a swarm of locusts comes out of the Abyss to afflict those on Earth who lack the seal of God on their foreheads. These locusts have a king named Abaddon in the Hebrew or Appolyon in the Greek. Here again, the Proverbs passage would indicate that these locusts are of supernatural origin like the ones in Amos 7, not ordinary locusts.)

The next time Gog is mentioned is in Ezekiel 38:1, where he is called by name as the leader of a coalition of what are now primarily Muslim nations attacking Israel. His final mention comes from the Book of Revelation where he again leads the people from Magog against the Lord’s army at the end of the Millennium (Rev. 20:8).

Even if you’re among those who place the battle of Ezekiel 38 at the end of the Millennium, the span of time between Gog’s last two biblical appearances is at least 1000 years, and while I believe that some born in that era will have long life spans, there isn’t any indication that natural humans born before the Millennium begins will live to see its end. This is especially true of God’s enemies, since all surviving unbelievers are removed from Earth at the beginning of our Lord’s reign.

So I’ve come to the conclusion that Gog is not a mere human, like Vladimir Putin. I think he’s a supernatural figure working behind the scene. The Bible clearly states that behind the human seats of government stand supernatural figures manipulating the thoughts and actions of the world’s leaders. These figures are in Satan’s employ, helping in his effort to wrest ownership of Planet Earth from its Creator. The Bible offers several examples of the supernatural forces behind human thrones. I believe there are enough of these to make it a general principle.

In Isaiah 14 beginning at verse 3 the Lord began a taunt against the King of Babylon. Then in verse 12 He identified this king as Lucifer (KJV) and goes on to describe his rebellion against God and eventual fall.

In Ezekiel 28 we see a similar situation with the Lord speaking first of the human king of Tyre and then verse 11, still calling him the king of Tyre, He began describing circumstances and events no human king has ever experienced. It’s clear He was again speaking of Satan.

In Daniel 10, the prophet wrote of a vision he saw in the third year of the Persian Empire while on a fast to gain understanding of prophetic events. In the 21st day of his fast an angel came to him apologizing for taking so long to reach him. He had been detained by one he called the prince of Persia and had to summon Michael the archangel for help in getting free (Daniel 10:12-13). Then in verses 20-21 the angel said he would have to continue his fight against the prince of Persia and after that the prince of Greece would come.

Angels cannot be not detained by humans, and whoever detained this angel was so powerful that it took Michael to free him. Also, the Greek Empire was still 200 years in the future at the time.

In Daniel 10:13 Michael is identified as one of the Lord’s chief princes. In Daniel 12:1we’re told that Michael will protect Israel at the end of the age. And in Rev 12:7 he’s seen leading the angelic host in a great battle in heaven when Satan is defeated there and cast down to Earth at the outset of the Great Tribulation. Michael is clearly a supernatural warrior leaping across the pages of history in defense of the Lord’s interests. It makes sense that Satan would have a military commander leading his forces as well, since everything he does seems to mirror the actions of his Creator. With his multiple mentions in Scripture and the long span of time between appearances, Gog could easily be this commander. Maybe it’s just an interesting coincidence, but one of the translations of Ezekiel 38:2 identifies Gog as the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal. That makes Gog the only other one called a chief prince in the Bible besides Michael.

Only time will tell if this view is correct. But one of the great advantages of living in our day is that we won’t have long to wait till we find out. You can almost hear the footsteps of the Messiah.

Question

Why isn't it possible for Gog to be human and possessed by a fallen angel like Antichrist is human and gets possessed by satan?

But then, there are some who believe Antichrist is actually a Nephelim.
 
Question

Why isn't it possible for Gog to be human and possessed by a fallen angel like Antichrist is human and gets possessed by satan?

But then, there are some who believe Antichrist is actually a Nephelim.
It is possible. I mostly agree with the OP, but also understand he could be a man.
I had raised the possibility in another thread that "Gog" may refer to both the fallen angel controlling the land and the human leader of the land at the prophetic time.
 
I had raised the possibility in another thread that "Gog" may refer to both the fallen angel controlling the land and the human leader of the land at the prophetic time.
That's what I've always believed, Gog is both the fallen angel who will reappear in the end of the Millennium, and the human "host" who leads Magog and commands the human armies that are under Gog's command.

In the same way that the Prince of Persia and Prince of Greece that Daniel mentions who opposed Michael are Princes but of an angelic order. The Prince of Greece and Persia were tied to geographic areas and the people living there. I expect that Gog of Magog functions in a similar way.

Alexander the Great had not yet been born when Daniel had this conversation with Michael, but we see this Prince of Greece, who no doubt assisted Alexander's rise, and conquest of Persia and the world of Alexander's day.
 
This makes sense.

I’ll have to dust off Andy Woods’ book The Middle East Meltdown. From what I recall he places the Ezekiel war at the beginning or prior to Daniel’s 70th week. It stops before completion (breaks off to allow the renewing of Covenant, level of peace is in Israel) then the war resumes.

I hope that’s not confusing, because I should reread the book before I ramble on, but anyhow, he splits the war.
From what I understand, Andy Woods believes Ez 38 is the second seal. If Andy believes that is before the tribulation, this is something I would be very interested to know about. @Spartan Sprinter I can't take the time right now for that Andy video but did it clear up if Andy sees Ez 38 as an event occuring prior to the 70th week? Because I know I have seen Andy mention that he sees Ez 38 as seal 2. Blessings.
 
Here's how Andy Woods responded to the question about Ezekiel 38--
"On Gog and Magog, I recommend Mark Hitchcock's papera that he did at the 2005 pre-trib study group. He does a good job listing all of the options for the timing of the Gog and Magog invasion.​
"I lean towards notion that this battle begins in the Tribulation period commensurate with the opening of the second seal.​
"However, I think this passage is speaking of something more that just a one time battle. Because the passage concludes with Israel in faith (Ezek 39:22, 29), I see its results lingering all the way to the end of the Tribulation period since this is when other Scripture indicates Israel will be converted (Matt 23:27-29; Zech 12:10)."​

 
Here's how Andy Woods responded to the question about Ezekiel 38--
"On Gog and Magog, I recommend Mark Hitchcock's papera that he did at the 2005 pre-trib study group. He does a good job listing all of the options for the timing of the Gog and Magog invasion.​
"I lean towards notion that this battle begins in the Tribulation period commensurate with the opening of the second seal.​
"However, I think this passage is speaking of something more that just a one time battle. Because the passage concludes with Israel in faith (Ezek 39:22, 29), I see its results lingering all the way to the end of the Tribulation period since this is when other Scripture indicates Israel will be converted (Matt 23:27-29; Zech 12:10)."​

Good summary!

From what I understand, Andy Woods believes Ez 38 is the second seal. If Andy believes that is before the tribulation, this is something I would be very interested to know about. @Spartan Sprinter I can't take the time right now for that Andy video but did it clear up if Andy sees Ez 38 as an event occuring prior to the 70th week? Because I know I have seen Andy mention that he sees Ez 38 as seal 2. Blessings.
TCC, the videos Spartan Sprinter linked are at the end of his series. They’re the Q & A sessions that ask ‘what about prophecy teachers watching for the Isaiah 17 Damascus war, and the Psalm 83 war?’ (There is one more that slips my mind.)

He does a good job describing how we get tripped up focusing on these wars, but Scripture clearly understood gives historical context that Damascus was destroyed (but not forever because Isaiah 17 does not use the word ‘forever’ unless your Bible version is based on the Septuagint). And Psalm 83 is a imprecatory Psalm.

If you get time listen to this mini-series, I did not do it justice in my summary.
 
That's what I've always believed, Gog is both the fallen angel who will reappear in the end of the Millennium, and the human "host" who leads Magog and commands the human armies that are under Gog's command.

In the same way that the Prince of Persia and Prince of Greece that Daniel mentions who opposed Michael are Princes but of an angelic order. The Prince of Greece and Persia were tied to geographic areas and the people living there. I expect that Gog of Magog functions in a similar way.

Alexander the Great had not yet been born when Daniel had this conversation with Michael, but we see this Prince of Greece, who no doubt assisted Alexander's rise, and conquest of Persia and the world of Alexander's day.

Thanks brother @Andy C for this article. One of the most deep dives I did back in 2017 when I even first started to care much about end times, for some reason, with this whole things with Ez 38. Pastor JD and Pastor John Barnett are largely responsble for the cue. Then came an onslaught of research against why Russia was not Gog. But after all the dust clears, Josephus seems to be most helpful with the Scythians. For their history is plentiful. And I found confirmed the things expressed in Jack's article. I find it ironic that Ez 38 (aside from youtube's Niberu and Mandella Effect early haunt intro into YouTube and end times for me) Ez 38 seemed to be the end time "tell."

Back then I thought it odd that where we start is Ez 38. Because in one sense I was like, "How do we know." Yet on another front, as I looked into it, it would seem the claim that it is not Russia seemed weak. And for me it became the way to understand Russia in relation to Ez 38 would be through history ( huge element in proper exegesis). But when we do that, we do well find the Great Wall of China, and we do find Josephus attesting to at that time Kazakastan (where the Scythians dwelled at that time in history). And Russias long standing (even shown in their own musuems) pride in being decendents of the Scythian people.

At first I thought looking at Ez 38 as a belwhether of end times was sensationalism. Because it just seemed kind of end time hypie to me. But the more I looked at it, the more it made sense it has some sense of traction, amen. When I discovered ways beyond Rosh being a title and such, I discovered that there are huge historical links to Russia regardless of the actually meaning of Rosh (which those who oppose the Russia as Gog view seem to almost camp on exclusively). So this intro itself seemed to imply two other things for me personally in my end time discovery journey.

1) That we understand Ez 38 hugely from Providence and history
2) We discover Ez 38 forming in ways and ironically having prophetic Intel that surpasses Revelation

Most end time approaches in the watcher community seemed steeped in back walking Revelation into our age and seeing the beast system connections. But Ez 38 pulls from the past and takes our focus more off of Revelation theories of the age of grace parlaying into the tribulation age, and establishes them ironically in a prophesy running tandem to our very era, Ez 38. Plus it makes sense that what the church might see best is that which comes out of the old testament forming and belonging to Israel. Making, I believe, a hot focus on Ez 38 a much likelier prophet ground zero focus of end times proper. Meaning, if we think we can see indicators of beast system data in our day hooking prophetic devents "and meaning" to things according to how we see them in Revelation--we might have even a more calibrated view (in terms of what to look at first that everything else should fall in place under) by noticing Ez 38 as a preememinant prophetic focus first. I would say because of how things line up with Ez 38 likely plumbline what other things looking prophetic might size up like through the filter of an Ez 38 preemenant belwhether prophetic filter. For example, the Abraham Accords. Do they speak more to Ez 38 than a precusor covenant with the many? If viewed through the latter, we would be looking for an Antichrist emerging or a 10 nation confederacy emerging "first and foremost." But if we are looking through a preeminant Ez 38 filter first, then the Abraham Accords seems like Ez 38 socks and underwear. With little care of how it connects to one who is coming we won't be here for, like. If that makes sense.

So one thing I would say in spades these days is that Ez 38, perhaps because it is maybe even proper prophetic etiquette per Romans 11:18-21. That the church consider Israel centric ground zero sensibilities preeminently for our (this providential side of the age of grace timing for our church age) ways to best fashion and shape prophetic views anchored in His word perhaps beyond conjecture that tend to blur perspective here and there. And in that sense, Ez 38 being the crown jewel for the church by which to understand her end time moment...that which (in Romans fashion) relates to Israel. If true, that would mean the thing that is not, Israel (still under partial hardening) God makes a most radioactive focus (even though dead she lives in radioactive way shower mode prophetically). When I see that Irony...it just seems like our God I would reckon, for it to be so.

And further finding through Uturn research that there are actually quite a bit of avenues to see the literal formation of Ez 38 timing and conditions. Which research helped me also oto consider that Ez 38 would seem to be our providential swiss watch moment to know more or less our approximation to the time that bell will ring. Amen. I went to JD's forum just to hang out in end times with like minded beievers. I went there because of Ez 38 interest. And while there discover even far more deeper intricacies of how Ez 38 performs today. So in some ways I am pretty stoked that early on the Lord having compassion leading me away from Niberu and Mandella Effect and idiot ways to use YouTube lol, Ez 38 seemed to become a pillar of cloud by day and a burning furnace by night guide into the prima facia royal gate prism by which to view end times proper through. At which time back then I had no idea if I should even entertain Ez 38. It sounded kind of fruit loops to me then. And even though now the watcher world does have a sense about it...it would seem whatever lack we may have toward understanding how it could be like an Indian tracker for us today, it tends to get a back seat to more seemingly shiney objects. So I really apreiciate the reminder here of your 2003 endeavor. In 2003, I was just starting to come back into the church after a four year run away from the church. And it would be another 14 years before I would start to realize I might be actually living in "that generation." :) Amen.

. . . . .

@Margery Interesting point Magery on Greece. This opens no few questions when we look at Daniel 10. For it would seem that the inference here is that the presence of a Grecian Prince was something Michael was apposed to strive against. We know the prince of Persia was not synonomous with how God used Cyrus and rose him up. For the prince of Persia seemed to have not been able to derail God's plan with Cyrus. And then there is Alexander the Great.

It would seem that there are perhaps evil fallen angel principalities that flex their muscle in light of God's plan for good in these same regions though it would seem. Because of Cyrus, perhaps there was a presence appearing of the Prince of Persia fallen angel entity. It would seem to also match a pattern with Alexander the Great perhaps. I found an interesting artical on Alexander and Israel from their own archives. It did seem he thought an angel led him. But it would seem there were two very strong purposes for Alexander from God (which would have no real sense upon a fallen angel Grecian Prince's activities though it might seem).

1) Greece paved the way for the world to use predonomnanlty one language. Grecian. So when the gospel came, it would disseminate plentifully under a commonly shared language throughout the known world
2) Alexander favored the Jews. Later the Seleucid dynasty did come against Israel. But this was not their experience with Alexander.

FASCINATING ARTICLE

We know Alexander was not a believer. But his conquer and reign in regards to Israel seemed like Cyrus lite...paving the world for one language gosple reception. It would seem.

. . . . .


When we look at Daniel, we do see Prince of Greece in a sense of something Michael comes against.

Daniel 10:18-22
18 Then this one with human appearance touched me again and strengthened me. 19 And he said, “[q]You who are treasured, do not be afraid. Peace be to you; take courage and be courageous!” Now as soon as he spoke to me, I felt strengthened and said, “May my lord speak, for you have strengthened me.” 20 Then he said, “Do you [r]understand why I came to you? But I shall now return to fight against the prince of Persia; so I am leaving, and behold, the prince of Greece is about to come. 21 However, I will tell you what is recorded in the writing of truth. Yet there is no one who [t]stands firmly with me against these forces except Michael your prince.

But it does not, in my understanding, seem to imply Alexander as a result. And it would seem that God have plans though perhaps through Alexander the Great in a semi-Cyrus like way for Israel in general but also greater for the lay of the land historically paved for Christ's arrival. So in that sense it would just seem somewhat difficult historically to comprehend Zechariahs horns vs crafstmen in Zech 1. Because it looks like there might be some interchange there. Not like 4 bad vs 4 good. But we see Persia take down Babylon (good for Israel). But then Persia forming later against Israel. Then Greece comes to protect Israel. But later the Seleucid dynasty be a problem for Israel. We see Israel in the 100's BC in good stead and forming pockets along with Rome. Where Jews flourished economically. And later Rome occupying them. Then still later dispersing them.

So with all that going on there looks more like a combo dance between Zech horns and Craftsman's of sorts. And in that dance, are there also good angel rulers over territories? It would seem yeah according to Jack's article per Daniel 12 Micheal to be one, amen. I believe Daniel 12 suggests so: 12 “Now at that time Michael, the great prince who stands guard over the sons of your people, will arise."

In looking at all of this, to me, it makes me wonder how this fits what we are looking at today. Or how it might be helpful. Like maybe Putin isn't the guy Gog uses or becomes. My guess is that he would be because it would seem if we are near the timing of Ez 38, what happens with Russia as it relates to the rest of the world, would share some measure of yoke we are witnessing in the USA. I realize this is bizzarro guessing hypothesis. But if wherever America is going plays into age of grace end time staging, it took us several years just to get here. Through a Trump admin, then a Biden, now Trump again. And who knows how many years of that or if still time thereafter, what. But whatever it all means, what seems to be "forming" seems to be baby steps of sorts. Running under water. Like God permitting truck loads of time to process a direction of things (like a huge ship "city size like" on the ocean slowly reangling from a rudder change takes quite awhile to reangle direction) may be shifting toward. Its not something like "POW" punch from a jack-in-the-box surprise. But more like we are spending a week at the hospital going through a series of 20 different tests...lol. So, since the USA is the power player and it itself is taken for a long long walk in the park (likely for people of our generation to slowly "get it" more and more as time passes), it would just seem to be hand-in-glove that Putin's longevity in office might also belong to a clear and familiar mini-series the world has a better chance at digesting over time of perhaps Putin's role. Well I know conjecture. But it would seem in concert with how slow motion the curtain is being pulled back perhaps and info too and fro per Daniel circulate like it is, at a snail's pace, bringing some things to light. As it may be. Not sure how to end this...lol. But lot's to consider...anem. :)
 
From what I understand, Andy Woods believes Ez 38 is the second seal. If Andy believes that is before the tribulation, this is something I would be very interested to know about. @Spartan Sprinter I can't take the time right now for that Andy video but did it clear up if Andy sees Ez 38 as an event occuring prior to the 70th week? Because I know I have seen Andy mention that he sees Ez 38 as seal 2. Blessings.
I Might have to change my forum nickname as pastor Adrian and Hol gave the response i was about to give🤣🤣🤣🤣
 
Good summary!


TCC, the videos Spartan Sprinter linked are at the end of his series. They’re the Q & A sessions that ask ‘what about prophecy teachers watching for the Isaiah 17 Damascus war, and the Psalm 83 war?’ (There is one more that slips my mind.)

He does a good job describing how we get tripped up focusing on these wars, but Scripture clearly understood gives historical context that Damascus was destroyed (but not forever because Isaiah 17 does not use the word ‘forever’ unless your Bible version is based on the Septuagint). And Psalm 83 is a imprecatory Psalm.

If you get time listen to this mini-series, I did not do it justice in my summary.
Well that kind of takes all the fun out of waiting for something in Syria to happen though, don't it? Party poopers....lol. Just playing. Yeah...there are things i would love to ask Andy i don't know what his answers will be. Like if Ez 38 is the second seal, then what we are saying is that the covenant with the many is as much interrupted by the day after they sign it as it does in the middle of the 7 years? Ending in Israeli annihilation? Or the attempt thereof? I'm just saying that to be a smarty pantz. :)

But Hol thanks for your kind and gracious reply. You know i never was a fan of the Damascus thing. It always gave me the vibe that it was hypie. But now that everyone is ok with playing it down, i want to the "other guy." :) Now that its out...i want to consider it. Yeppers...from the peanut gallery.

But on a serious note here is the thing i don't see in discussion. The way i feel about it in my own studies (because the one thing i don't see that discussion taken into account is):

Isaiah 14:28 In the year that King Ahaz died, this pronouncement came...

Ok now look and see if from the page you find Isaiah 14:28 on and read read read up until Isaiah 17. Do you see any reason why Isaiah 17 is not in the year that King Ahaz Died? If so, if we look that up...that is after Damascus had been said to have been judged. Please check the years on that. I know chapter 14 is not chapter 17. But between those two chapters there is no change in motioned time or addressing of a different time is there? If i am mistaken i am more than happy to reconsider. But i don't think knowing if it says forever or not is the issue though. I could be totally wrong. But when i studied this like 5 years ago...no one could answer that. In some ways i am glad to see the excitement die down from waiting to see what happens with Damascus. Because i would see that as super healthy. But would that not be funny if now Damascus poof...lol. Well no not funny. Because those people there. Wow. Sorry for it to come across like that. But i mean funny in an ironic way. Well, i have to run for now but will check back. But if anyone knows how to address this...i will totally check it out. I just never recall ever a good answer for that. Or even that it was a questions we might or should ask.

Blessings so much for your reply. Please excuse the banter. I'm just really blessed by this family and sometimes i can just show it too in being spunky even though it might not come across as meant. Love you guys. Thanks Blessings.
 
This is not what you're looking for I am sure, brother, but I've always viewed Isaiah 17 as being just before Armageddon. There is no safety or protection in Israel, and the splendor of Jacob (that is to say the wealth and honor of Israel) has faded. All Israel had will be consumed away like the reapers clean out a field. But! But a small remnant will remain (v6) and it is those who will look "look to their Maker and turn their eyes to the Holy One of Israel (v7)" which I see as a prophetic reference that ties to Zechariah 12:10 (they will look on Him whom they pierced and mourn) which itself, to me at least, is a clear reference to Christ when He returns to earth and ends the battle Armageddon by destroying the Antichrist and all those who followed him and saving the remnant of Israel. It tells us as we reach the end of Isaiah 17 that, despite all the destruction, the time will come when (v14) the enemy who has them in terror will be destroyed in one night.

Those are my reasons for placing Isaiah 17 at the time leading up to and including the Battle of Armageddon. And I see the burden of Damascus in that same general time frame/context and not well in advance of that time as many expositors see it. If you find this bizarre or confusing, let me explain my hermeneutic for eschatology.

Revelation is not an afterthought or a sidebar to the end of times prophecies given in the Old Testament or even earlier in the new. Nor is it another series of prophecies to be placed alongside all of the other Old Testament and New Testament prophecies. No, I believe it is clearly a revelation of the overall picture and timeline of everything that will happen, given us by Jesus who wants His bride to be fully aware. And it is into the overall framework of Revelation that we can now place all of the many prophecies from the Old Testament as well as the New. Therefore, when we lay out the timeline and framework of the book of Revelation, it gives us the proper context for each of the Bibles previous end Times prophecies.

By using this method, I find the confusion of where to place all of the primarily Old Testament prophecies in time and history is largely gone. The clues in the information given to those old prophets (which clues we find in the text itself) allow us to understand better where everything fits when placed as an overlay of the events revealed in the Book of Revelation. At least, that's the hermeneutic I follow when studying eschatology. It seems to work for me. :shrug:
 
This is not what you're looking for I am sure, brother, but I've always viewed Isaiah 17 as being just before Armageddon. There is no safety or protection in Israel, and the splendor of Jacob (that is to say the wealth and honor of Israel) has faded. All Israel had will be consumed away like the reapers clean out a field. But! But a small remnant will remain (v6) and it is those who will look "look to their Maker and turn their eyes to the Holy One of Israel (v7)" which I see as a prophetic reference that ties to Zechariah 12:10 (they will look on Him whom they pierced and mourn) which itself, to me at least, is a clear reference to Christ when He returns to earth and ends the battle Armageddon by destroying the Antichrist and all those who followed him and saving the remnant of Israel. It tells us as we reach the end of Isaiah 17 that, despite all the destruction, the time will come when (v14) the enemy who has them in terror will be destroyed in one night.

Those are my reasons for placing Isaiah 17 at the time leading up to and including the Battle of Armageddon. And I see the burden of Damascus in that same general time frame/context and not well in advance of that time as many expositors see it. If you find this bizarre or confusing, let me explain my hermeneutic for eschatology.

Revelation is not an afterthought or a sidebar to the end of times prophecies given in the Old Testament or even earlier in the new. Nor is it another series of prophecies to be placed alongside all of the other Old Testament and New Testament prophecies. No, I believe it is clearly a revelation of the overall picture and timeline of everything that will happen, given us by Jesus who wants His bride to be fully aware. And it is into the overall framework of Revelation that we can now place all of the many prophecies from the Old Testament as well as the New. Therefore, when we lay out the timeline and framework of the book of Revelation, it gives us the proper context for each of the Bibles previous end Times prophecies.

By using this method, I find the confusion of where to place all of the primarily Old Testament prophecies in time and history is largely gone. The clues in the information given to those old prophets (which clues we find in the text itself) allow us to understand better where everything fits when placed as an overlay of the events revealed in the Book of Revelation. At least, that's the hermeneutic I follow when studying eschatology. It seems to work for me. :shrug:

I find that very ironic. I don't believe I have heard that approach before. But it makes sense in a way that would have seemed politically incorrect or something before...lol. Like it seems you have a swimming against the tide motif in your bones as well as I but perhaps in diverse proportpoin. Mainly what we hear is how old language is used in Revelation and the politically correct thing to do is understand Revelaiton through the old testament. Define things that way, and then...Revelation comes alive.

Whereas it seems you see Revelation as a table of contents with a decoder ring of sorts by which to scoop up all other OT prophecies along the way. And just by the mere fact you are the first to suggest this, at least that I have heard, I like it. Not that I like "the new thing," because I believe most of those are fly-by-night. But not this one. Thanks for sharing that Pastor. You will be happy to know I share in that in ways but seldom articulate it like that...even to my own self. Probably because in our end time era it would seem the church can tend to contemporize (I think that's a word...lol) Revelation in a way that is too commercially fresh for me to care. But the way you just laid that out...that actually bears witness brother.

And I'm not just saying that. I would guess on this forum it is not common to hear me tout Revelation as in good hands in the watcher movement. For, to me, i actually don't trust it all that much in the watcher end time machine. So because of the tendency for every Tom, Dick, and Harry to offer their views and soup soup soup it up. It makes me almost want to become a neo dark age enthusiast and start a "Let's take the book of Revelation and lock it up from harms way" cult. But I know that is not the answer. But kind of why I don't champion views from that book (well other than my own neo soupy 1st seal view...lol).

But this does prompt me to want to express something that, while I have been kind of lying in wait to interject "anything" Revelation oriented, I actually have some very nastalgic roots and anchors in the prime grade A value of the book of Revelation in our day. And I guess this is a pretty good place to state it.

In my school days I was interested in world literature. Also creative writing. So I took a lot of classes . One class had us write in different story form. The one i hated the most was called modular narrative. I wasn't crazy about it because it was kind of hard to understand how to write (or even read) like that. The plot drive in modular narrative is different than others. It would seem all other familiar writing styles of story or narrative were primarily linear. Whereas modular narrative is not linear. It could be. But it is commonly on purpose not linear. So to me that was like trying to enjoy a story as some distorted dream someone would convey. I found myself not having the patience nor interest in that kind of writing.

But as I got used to painstakingly learn this narrative form, it kind of opened my eyes to story a bit more. The idea is to write from theme or POV more than tell a story linearly. It would have flash forward and flash back. It would have themes or poetic emblems that symbolize the drive of the story more than one event occuring after another event typically found in clear moment by moment linear story form. And there are many ways to go about modular narrative. It was a lot more fun once I got past the daunting challenging of my bias toward it. In some ways, it kind of became my favorite style in some ways.

But the reason I bring that up is because after being exposed to that, I was also within a few years interested in end times. So for the first time in like 25 years, I read the book of Revelation. I threw all commentaries to the side. And I just read it over and over until some sense of flow with it would make better sense thean the 1 million different ways commentaries would confuse a way to even look at that book. On its face, Revelation is linear. But as I was introduced to literary technique, I realized that Revelation had its own literary style. I know it is commonly included in "apocalyptic literature." And that has a long standing place in what category of writing it belongs with along with so many other books. But it seemed to make a lot more sense as I considered modular narrative toward Revelation. Or better said, after reading it a gang of times over the course of a few months, Revelation seemed to tug at some back stored away insight I had previously learned about modular narrative.

So I did some research about modular narrative and found it was pretty young. Started in the 1800s. And is the primary mode for Hollywood today. So that's interesting. Revelation written in a Hollywood genre? lol. Yeah that would go over well. But it would make sense on one level. That, although it would be a book to be read over centuries and profitable for any age Christian to read, it would make sense that ultimately it was written in literary style in the age it would be most for. And that intrigued me.

Now I know there is a whole historical genre in Israeli writing and poetic style unto itself outside of modular narrative. Like chiasm. But this was different. I suppose even to get to make sense of why the book of Daniel "also" is written apparently in modular narrative of sorts (for its chapters are not in order), I am sure there are many elements of how Daniel would have been understood to be written out of linear order. And many of those reason would resolve in Israeli type writing in antiquity (perhaps having nothing to do with modular narrative approahces). To discern that would take a while to understand the literary scholarship arguing things like that. I tried but never got very far there. But what was clearly established in Daniel for me, was that it too did have earmarks of modular narrative in concept. But it would seem, Revelation, all the more.

. . . . .

So just to say, that in this way, that Revelation is written in a way that may actually testify of its unique belonging to the age its literary style came from (the future--a no brainer for God), might also suggest it having the potential, ability, and acumen of being a master file "by which" to include its ancestralish matching earlier prophetic writings from the OT. And up till this day, I don't believe I have met anyone who expressed it in terms you have that align with this view. But it would seem, brother, that Revelation's own literary form style would attest to its authoratitive unique quality to be a master file of sorts in which the Lord has encouraged you in some ways related to consider. Pretty cool. Thanks for letting me and us know brother. Blessings.
 
I like your term "decoder ring"! :lol: I hadn't thought of it in that way, but I guess that's the way I view it: Revelation is the decoder ring for all eschatological prophecy. It gives context and timeline for all Old Testament (and, for that matter, New Testament) end times prophecies. I do not think Jesus gave us this book simply to add details to the end times. I believe it is a complete revelation so that we will be able to understand all that we need to understand. It helps us make sense of what he gave the prophets many hundreds of years before.
 
I like your term "decoder ring"! :lol: I hadn't thought of it in that way, but I guess that's the way I view it: Revelation is the decoder ring for all eschatological prophecy. It gives context and timeline for all Old Testament (and, for that matter, New Testament) end times prophecies. I do not think Jesus gave us this book simply to add details to the end times. I believe it is a complete revelation so that we will be able to understand all that we need to understand. It helps us make sense of what he gave the prophets many hundreds of years before.

Thanks pastor. This helps provide me with a deeper appreciation of i think what many watchers want to mean. But seem to get led around by their instincts more than how you have expressed settles rightly in the soul. It helps me process and appreciate things on Revelation related with how end times views are considered. If I were to label that in modern vernacular, your explanation, to me, kind of makes Revelation great again. Not that it needs any of us to do that. Its just wow, that book has been on the comic book chopping block so much...that kind of play in season and out and kind of helps deflate luster. Not that what any age does with that can change its value. But if you ever been in that spin out ride that runs fast in a circle so you stick to the wall...that's how i have been feeling about the books handling today. I mean its fun. But a lot of people get sick on on that ride. And so in that way, its like the ride stops. I get off...so glad that one's done. And then you hand me the book of revelation primed in calf leather & red lettered. And as the earth stops spinning i sit on an amusement park bench and am so glad to be looking at words that are not flying all over the room "again." And soft genuine cool calf leather to augment the read's suppleness to the soul. And i hear the birds chirping and feel the sun on my face again...like somehow...all is right with the world again...moment..."agian." :) Blessings.
 
Like chiasm. But this was different. I suppose even to get to make sense of why the book of Daniel "also" is written apparently in modular narrative of sorts (for its chapters are not in order)
If I recall correctly, Pastor Woods points to a chiasm style in Daniel 2 to 7. In other words chapters 2 relate to chapter 7, chapter 3 to 6, and chapter 4 to 5.

That makes sense to me, but I haven’t understood Daniel’s entire book as a chiasm? Could you elaborate?
 
Back
Top