There have been several times in the past where I was convinced I was right in regards to certain prophetic events. Turns out I was wrong. Often times it can be easy to mistake thoughts I have with what I thought were teachings from the Holy Spirit. So if I believe something I think is coming from Him, and it turns out to be incorrect, then IMO, it cant be from Him.
I hear that. I think it is healthy to see that. I think its a blessing to see that brother. Be willing to see how God is not in something. Imagine if those better known in the watcher community did that. It would actually be healing to the body of Christ I believe.
Hey I don't know if you ever watch or watched God Rules YouTube channel? Tony has been a YT watcher from way back. I don't agree with some of his more Michael Heiser takes on some things, and in my journey have discovered the whole Enoch thing to be not from God. But the way he talks. The way he shows how he reasons through the scripture was note worthy for me.
Recently he brought up several unusual angles as he does and showed in scripture why he believes as he does. When I watch him, of course I am interested in considering some aspects of how some conventional views Christendom has might be conditioned thinking to a degree. But what I found myself honestly being washed over by was how unbelievably graceful his "thought process" demonstrated to me a very thoughtful kind mature mind. I've seen it in other ways with him over the years. But last night, and I was not even looking for this, he would share thing after thing where I would generally expect a kind of rigid insistence or semi-back burner scolding to be a part of his delivery (in part because to some degree it likely has gotten perhaps even into the grammar structure of typical end times approaches--in general...not saying everyone). But Andy, totally brother, like I would practically use the word "holy" to describe what seemed to be a very wholesome care to how he so innocently seemed to share things. To the degree it caught me off guard in several places.
I guess what that might indicate to some degree is that I am used to hearing points some might land on from perhaps less seasoned or rounded thought processes? lol. Honestly, it was almost weird. Because I certainly don't think a lot of his views come from truth. But sometimes I think a guy like that can uncover some interesting perspectives from how he is looking at stuff.
So i guess in general, just speaking from watching my own kinds of organic responses to things, I imagine there will be quite a number of things that come to us not from God we might otherwise consider as really being in sync with Him. In a way I think I'm somewhat ok with that because it seems to be extremely common. But I guess what stands out more to me these days is how 1 Cor 13 principles make something profitable. Maybe the ideas expressed be off, but the value of spiritual principles contained in expression might be every bit as valuable on several levels transcending even what is being said or affirmed. Like a loving graciousness. What is from God is the romantic super hero quality of love making "whatever" profitable. As a former card carrying memeber of the pitbulls without leashes society (a spirit that might be super eager to be more on the footing of "ready, shoot, aim"...and in that order), I do concur though with your concern (at least as where I also see concerns too). That it is good to be aware moreso of "what is of God."
AT ITS CORE
At its core, where I am coming from is I have seen an unusual twin concept over the past many decades. The reformed circles I ran in supercharge "what is of God and what is not." And enforced those concepts deeply. The twin? Well, there is also a very real and true side to it. There are quite a number of things that man may halfhazardly employ that is a good thing of God, but damaging in the way mankind might use it. So to mistake that proverbial baby with the bathwater has developed in me over the years as a neurois of sorts. So yeah, I do have quite a bit of empathy and passion, even, about us being willing to consider how much our viewpoints might be from God or not. Or of God or not. Amen.
I believe your bringing it up brother is just something you notice that is discussion worthy. Amen. And a likely conclusion could be that it is likely no one will see accurately the rapture coming. Amen. And perhaps that is a healing takeaway. Its just for me, I have seen in circles that kind of thinking too can become dogmatic. Sometimes, yes, in helpful ways. And sometimes not so helpful. But I understand, I believe, the blood flow of concern. And yeah for sure we should not be all about having one illusion about prophecy after another after another and then just call it a day. Lol. I realize wow, that would aspire to live in folly. And that is a super genuine concern. I believe I am kind of more about us not landing too dogmatically too soon though. I don't mean for that to mean that I believe being a super hero against clarity or being a staunch defender of milquetoast to be a cabinet with force in the presidency of our own lives. From the cuff I would say I believe we can know a whole lot more about rapture timing than we might think. That is my position. That is my deep seated conviction. Aside from of course that potentially being absolutely wrong, I just bring that up to say that I'm not intending to come from mediocrity as a way of meadoring through prophecy. But actually in honor of celebrating a core concern of yours. And that we can bask in uncertainty of it all, and be ok with that. As I would view that take as incredibly honorable. On the surface though, I reckon the bulk of my intension is to agree to the extent I would share with your concern, but not at the expense of where we might actually have a potential to better understand rapture timing.
Saying that in the midst of the genuine appreciation of honest appraisal of where we can get things a miss and they not be from God though we sense they might have, can tend to dilute seemingly the importance of just recognizing our temporality in meekness. Yes. I could see that. Not that you are saying that even. But yeah not wanting to drown out the simple clarity of how wrong we can be even from sincere points of view. Because I see that as noble. For sure. I guess what I see that though can and to also do in our climate is how it can subtly suggest that we may not come to be aware of some things too I guess. I believe there is an extreme amount of complication to get to best clarity. So I don't think its easy necessarily to land here or there so much. But I guess the best way to express where I'm coming from in this is that since we live in a day and age where it appears God to be demonstrating His character toward a generation possibly primed for the greatest hardship to hit planet earth, that being the case I believe would suggest a potentially far more knowable pace in Him to be alive in. And I may not be too certain exactly what all that might mean, entertaining notions of our propensity to think things are from God when are not--would not be a more potent thing than the affluence of insight peraps gained from the character of one very willing to disclose Himself to His creation. Perhaps knowing how that works and to what degree it actually be a challenge, we may not know. But perhaps what we can know is His willingness toward His creation. And that that might be quite a bit more in play than whether whatever else we think we might conclude to be. Blessings.