TCC
Well-known
Trump White House Debuts 'Podcast Row' as New Media Push Expands
The Trump Administration on Thursday unveiled its new "Podcast Row," a dedicated section for podcasters to stream from the White House.
www.thewrap.com
The Trump Administration on Thursday unveiled its new “Podcast Row,” a dedicated section for podcasters to stream and record directly from the White House.
Podcast Row’s debut comes as President Donald Trump has emphasized giving access to “new media” outlets, with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt opening the White House press briefing room to several podcasters, content creators and non-mainstream news organizations in the last two months.
“Hey everybody, today is Podcast Row here at the White House and our team has gathered a room full of podcasters with cabinet officials, White House officials who are talking to them about the president and his agenda,” Leavitt said in a video on X. “And I bet you, the people in that room have much more viewers than CNN and the legacy media, just saying. We’re proud to welcome them to the White House.”
. . . . .
ASSOCIATED NEWS
Karoline Leavitt to make major change to White House press briefings
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt is at the center of the move which critics say targets legacy media in favor of pro-Trump or digital-first outlets.
MAGA influencers targeted by "swatting" calls
Swatting involves hoax emergency service calls that send police, sometimes including armed response units, to a person's home.
www.newsweek.com
. . . . .
The way I see it is that the shift from legacy media to the power of the person (not corporation) is our era. With Joe Rogen, Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, Candace Owens etc, as examples of media mindset moving away from network news with controlled talking points. Instead (regardless of how we may feel about popular podcasting and their agendas too), media power has been shifting to the people. A unique era to witness.
In addition to that seemingly providential organic trend, we are also kind of coming out of being under the influence of controlled media (like coming off a controlled substance or spell upon the land). And provided access to uncaged reporting. In this climate, there is no shortage of conspiracy concerns (some real, some not so real). Aside from controversy being a part of our media moment transition, we get to see news from we the people. Instead of ingesting media consumption like a drug. Again, yes there are controversies on all sides. But that phenomenon is what is occuring, noted.
And if that is the age we now live in, and the White House is interested in being a part of that evolution, it could either be good or some new form of manipulation at a far more personal level. What helps me keep a somewhat sober sense of where to draw conspiracy lines is just trying to realize what is at least on the surface real.
1. Biden + Admin wanted illegals in the country (even flew them out of their own countries to be here)
2. Left Wing Judges do not want gang level criminals flow out of the country
3. The Left interest in state Attorney Generals taking Soros money as well as conducting massive criminal release from jail during the COVID manufactured crisis
1-3 occured. There might be more nefarious connections of course than what meets the eye. But 1-3 occured. So if we compare that to what we see now, this is what looks, to me, like what is forming.
A. Globalism holds both the left the and right. However there are some in both camps coming out and away from the of the globalist networks (more so seemingly on the right).
B. A number one Globalist desire is to reduce American sovereignty. In order to power play the world, America cannot be strong.
C. Try to defund the police and introduce social worker level national new police force (one not tied to the constitution)
D. Open borders, flood the country with non-citizens (just like the Arab Spring model)
E. Use non-citizens as your new militia (something Obama suggested or hinted at)
F. Use gangs and criminals to do you street foot soldier enforcing (they are corrupt, greedy, easy to power broker, and blackmailable)
As the above would seem to be the state of affairs, it would make sense that the following takes shape:
- Syphon off globalist bankroll stream (DOGE)
- Find corruption ties to help clear corrupt leaders from making powerful local decisions
- Strengthen international ties (as globalism is international)
- Empower new media outlets
- Deport gang migrant infiltration
All of the above has to be in play in order to make releasing highly toxic classified documents worth releasing (to get real time traction). Otherwise, too much media blockage, and too many still empower to block legally, and too many street gangs to activate blowback (placing citizens in danger) would be globalist strong holds over society. Releasing info too early would certify chaos and public harm (as well as deflate normal channels of legal action along the way if too many globalists power brokers are still in place).
To me, what might seem as a psyop (just government pretending to be in flux) seems to be following A-F. Which is what you would do if you were to get the most bang for the classified detail release buck. So what seems to be occuring in America is the path strategically that would be followed if taking America back where to be a thing. If the only way that could ever happen in any universe or matrix is if we are only deceived into yet another version of the same ol song and dance, this would of course be understandable. But then, having that view presents a logical fallacy. Making anything that could be real impossible to consider. For if the only way America could have a sense where it could actually break free from globalism (as it did from England) is, "never" it can't happen. Then that version of the argument makes American potential to go against globlalism impossible to every be a reality. And becomes an argument that cannot be falseafied. Which would mean, at least in part (for any holding that view) that perhaps the greater psyop might be to believe logical fallacy is the truth. A rather complex position to defend. And it would seem to be a position not favored to defend. But today it seems to be even defended prophetically. Like that "next level" of willingness and eagerness to defend. And being fair, it makes sense on some concerned levels. But if we make anything unfalsifiable, how could we ever know? And that, to me, is kind of the thing. Being too certain of our own views on that (and armoring it with unfalsifiable logical fallacy) to me is not the same as having prophetic insight. Logical fallacy is not prophetic acumen. Just saying. It just is plainly not that though.
Blessings.
