What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

JD Farag Bible Prophecy Update

I listened to Joshua but it was clips from Jack Hibbs- and I wanted Jack's full broadcast, so I went over to Jack's channel and got the link for Jack's original.

It has a LOT more that Joshua didn't include- I recommend the original although Joshua's commentary is very complementary to Jack Hibbs.

Joshua was right about this, it's one of Jack's best, and should be a must see for anyone who ends up debunking the garbage from the likes of Paula White, Kenneth Copeland, Bill Johnson

Joshua was mostly taking clips from part 2 but here is both:

Part 1:


and part 2 here
LOL the same Kenneth Copeland that was going to summon the flames of hell to get rid of COIV 19 ?
 
and I've grown to respect Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson in her careful handling of the recent problems coming from Daystar.

Laura Lynn had a big shock or realized she was deceived as her former church had William Branham visited. The interview was done months ago but appeared dated a month ago in her YT channel. She is now examining the whole NAR movement with some invited guests in her show to explain it.

I have posted John Collins podcasts with her in some former posts in this thread. The last few weeks will be tracing the history on how NAR come about.

This Wed will continue the history in WBHR podcast with Charles Paisley.

I am attaching two screenshots in links I took in one of the podcasts.


 

18 - 20 Aug 2025​


Trump, Dominionism, and the Quest for a Modern Messiah: A Discussion With Holly Pivec​

I’m joined by Holly Pivec—author, researcher, and host of a brand-new podcast. We spend a large part of this conversation talking about her new show: why she launched it, what topics she’s covering, and how she’s helping Christians discern the truth about the NAR's Kingdom Now theology. This belief system fuels the 7 Mountains Mandate, the idea that Christians must take control of government, media, education, and more to establish God’s kingdom on earth.


BONUS PODCAST: Red Heifer Update​

Mondo Gonzales joins the program to give an update on the Red Heifers.


The ‘Black Sheep’ of Bible Prophecy 2 :: By Mark A. Becker​

What I found was that many of the popular, traditional prophecy teachings of many of my favorite teachers did not stand up to scrutiny with what I was learning through my own studies.


The Day of the Lord (New Testament) :: By Pete Garcia​

According to my understanding of Scripture, the Day of the Lord is both a period of time as well as a singular day. The first mention of it (by this specific phrasing) is by Peter in Acts 2:20


===================

Nothing to See Here: World Economic Forum Internal Investigation Clears Founder Klaus Schwab of Wrongdoing​

An internal investigation conducted by the World Economic Forum has determined that there was no evidence that founder and former chairman Klaus Schwab committed wrongdoing during his time at the helm of the top globalist institution.


World Economic Forum Names A Suitably Evil New Leader…​

BlackRock CEO, already controlling trillions in assets, now sits atop the Davos machine pushing the “Great Reset”


World Economic Forum Appoints BlackRock's Larry Fink As Co-Chair In Move That 'Marks A Pivotal Transition'​

“We look forward to helping shape a more resilient and prosperous future, and to reinventing and strengthening the Forum as an indispensable institution for public-private cooperation.”


------------------------

Age Verification Lobby Pushes For Age Verification Checks For VPN Use​

Privacy tools are being rebranded as loopholes in need of closure


America's Power Grid Continues To Get Strained As Energy Bills Increase, As Country Races To Build More Datacenters​

"The amount of power being requested is like all of New York's power in one single site," said an analyst.


-------------------------

Would YOU use a robot surrogate? China develops the world's first 'pregnancy humanoid' that's capable of giving birth to a live baby​

It's a concept that currently only exists in sci–fi movies.


Flu Shot Revolt: Troops Say They’re Being Crushed for Refusing ‘Unlawful Orders’​

“President Trump and Defense Secretary Hegseth are giving the illusion that they are trying to make it right—but soldiers say their careers are being destroyed.”


-------------------------
 
I listened to Joshua but it was clips from Jack Hibbs- and I wanted Jack's full broadcast, so I went over to Jack's channel and got the link for Jack's original.

It has a LOT more that Joshua didn't include- I recommend the original although Joshua's commentary is very complementary to Jack Hibbs.

Joshua was right about this, it's one of Jack's best, and should be a must see for anyone who ends up debunking the garbage from the likes of Paula White, Kenneth Copeland, Bill Johnson

Joshua was mostly taking clips from part 2 but here is both:

Part 1:


and part 2 here
It is good to see Jack Hibbs identifying false teachers. In any of this though, has Jack separated himself from NAR? From what I understand Che Ahn is running for CA Govenor in 2026, but has said recently that he is no longer associated with NAR. So in general, it seems like there is a movement among previous NAR supporters to move away from them to a degree. Che's move for governor would explain his wanting to distance himself from NAR I suppose politically. Which is kind of why I would ask if there is any sense Hibbs has officially moved away from NAR? In part, the issues concerning Michael Brown might have woken some people in NAR up. Hopefully.

In any event, I am glad to at least see Hibbs calling out bad teachers and seeing a path forward aside from Trump. Amen. It was needed. For the record, I do not view an interest in nationalism or having a pro-political stance in society to = being a dominionist or NAR. I believe Christians can be involved in politics and often should. And I believe that being a nationalist is biblical because that is how God formed society. But because of the concerns in recent years that have arisen with NAR and Trump, to me, it is becoming increasingly difficult for believers to distinguish between NAR and what can be very healthy community care through politics. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater, to sort of speak.

I believe in JD's case, he has affirmed that being politically minded in our current climate so close to the end of the age is holding too dearly to this earth. And although I believe there are some good warnings that come from a position like JD's, JD was also aware of how much a blessing his friend Bud has been in his life. And that to a degree, by JD extending friendship with Bud, JD knows there are some sane and healthy ways to be involved politically if some Christains have more of an interest in that.

To me in general, it seems in our day that there is a tendency to merge genuine political care with Christian Natioanlism and NAR. And I would see a lack of distinction there as very unhealthy. And allowing the spirit of the age to blur the lines. Having said that though, I am glad to see Hibbs becoming more centered as a pastor. Amen. Blessings.
 
It is good to see Jack Hibbs identifying false teachers. In any of this though, has Jack separated himself from NAR? From what I understand Che Ahn is running for CA Govenor in 2026, but has said recently that he is no longer associated with NAR. So in general, it seems like there is a movement among previous NAR supporters to move away from them to a degree. Che's move for governor would explain his wanting to distance himself from NAR I suppose politically. Which is kind of why I would ask if there is any sense Hibbs has officially moved away from NAR? In part, the issues concerning Michael Brown might have woken some people in NAR up. Hopefully.

In any event, I am glad to at least see Hibbs calling out bad teachers and seeing a path forward aside from Trump. Amen. It was needed. For the record, I do not view an interest in nationalism or having a pro-political stance in society to = being a dominionist or NAR. I believe Christians can be involved in politics and often should. And I believe that being a nationalist is biblical because that is how God formed society. But because of the concerns in recent years that have arisen with NAR and Trump, to me, it is becoming increasingly difficult for believers to distinguish between NAR and what can be very healthy community care through politics. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater, to sort of speak.

I believe in JD's case, he has affirmed that being politically minded in our current climate so close to the end of the age is holding too dearly to this earth. And although I believe there are some good warnings that come from a position like JD's, JD was also aware of how much a blessing his friend Bud has been in his life. And that to a degree, by JD extending friendship with Bud, JD knows there are some sane and healthy ways to be involved politically if some Christains have more of an interest in that.

To me in general, it seems in our day that there is a tendency to merge genuine political care with Christian Natioanlism and NAR. And I would see a lack of distinction there as very unhealthy. And allowing the spirit of the age to blur the lines. Having said that though, I am glad to see Hibbs becoming more centered as a pastor. Amen. Blessings.
Very good points, and I agree.

Jack was on Daystar, which is crammed to the rafters with NAR but as Daystar's "issues" continue to unfold, more and more people that were on there like Jack and like Laura Thompson are doing a rethink.

And that is a healthy thing. We can all get caught up with others in a movement, or a group and go along till something happens that makes us pause, rethink and do a little distancing and consider the theology more deeply.

I find the merge points with politics and "christian" nationalism a bit difficult because I'm a Christian, but not an American so sometimes when the 2 merge it's a bit tricky to pick them apart and find the points of agreement as a Christian, and the areas where God bless you guys but I'm a Canuck born and bred and I'm just going to be a patriotic Canadian.

If my country is busy doing bad things (every country does, people are saved, not countries) I call it out, and the rest of the time I'm all about making Canada great again just like MAGA is to the south.

Christians all around the world have a lot in common with other Christians in the States, but it doesn't make us Americans, or think like Americans, or even cause us to want to be Americans (unless we are called to become Americans, like @mattfivefour is )

I want to be the best Christian Canadian possible, witnessing to those around me, building my country, praying for my leaders even when they are bone headed stupid or evil.

When you said this:
there is a tendency to merge genuine political care with Christian Natioanlism and NAR. And I would see a lack of distinction there as very unhealthy. And allowing the spirit of the age to blur the lines.
I wanted to stand up and cheer! That puts it into words for me. The spirit of the age IS blurring the lines! Because that's what Satan DOES! Truth brother! PREACH!

Oh and this business of the NAR- because I was involved in that before it even had that name, in that bad church in the 90s, I'm SO allergic to it and I see it all over.

It reaaaaallly gave me the creeps to find out that Douglas Wilson is influential in politics on the Right nowadays. People are easily sucked in, I don't blame Pete Hegseth, after all I was in a NAR church back in the 90s without realizing why it was going nuts. But he's in a position of power, and just like Paula White did with Trump, they gravitate towards positions of influence in politics and power ON PURPOSE!!!!

That 7 mountain thing again.

I felt sick finding out who that Feucht guy is- that Canada didn't allow to perform. I'm still not happy about banning his performance, but I found out the guy is HILLSONG! And WORD FAITH. Justin Peters had a critique of him and his theology up months ago and I just found out when I was trying to figure out who that Feucht christian singer guy was.

Another mountain mandate at work- culture. The so called 7 mountains include politics, arts and entertainment, business and several other areas where these people infiltrate and influence with a very very false theology rooted in works- Dominating the culture, dominating the world and bringing it all under THEIR control before Jesus can come back.

They don't even realize how blasphemous that is, to put Jesus ability to come back, behind their ability to dominate and control the world. NO wonder the leftists go squirrelly because even though they don't have a clue about the theology, they know it's bad. And it's giving Christianity a bad name.
 
Wow. Thanks Margery for your kind words and thoughts. Glad it makes sense what i am saying. I think your passion for the Lord and for Canada sound wonderful. Your previously shared views of not wanting Canada to go further under the EU wing is precious. And i would say, "That is the spirit." Fortunately as deep into the Americanized version of the Reformed world that i got, it never crossed over into Doug Wilson land.

So lately I have been binging on Bibleline youtube channel which is a staunch Free Grace position channel that has kind of been helpful and healthy for me. I tend to like a bit deeper and meatier theological observances, but in what the channel does, it helps me see some wonderful qualities I'm still thawing out from.

* Being able to hear convicting calls of scripture outside the distortion of Lordship Salvation is so incredibly refreshing and allows me to see the true doctrinal beauty in the book of 1 John, which i am going through on the channel right now. To be able to "consider" and "appreciate" the commands of scripture for what they are (not for what they aren't) almost seems strange to me...but in far better beautiful way.

* Seeing the true passion of the word on multiple levels and how that looks from a pulpit that has its hair down (even though he doesn't really have hair) has been for me almost like bathing in an honest delivery of the word. In some ways it almost seems illegal to me...lol. Like my formerly groomed side is wondering if that pastor got permission from Christian elite circles to say such things...lol.

* Ironically, that channel sees the rapture to be extremely soon too. Which was not the reason i went. I just stumbled across it one day and shared it with a friend who was pretty beaten up by the Lordship class along with me years ago. And several weeks later he was really grateful and found a lot of value. So i was shocked it has that impression on him. And am now going a bit deeper myself through 1 John...which in some ways like a whole new world. I don't see completely eye to eye with that pastor but on Free Grace stances, it has helped a lot.

In some ways it is like a similar honeymoon phase i had with JD in how God used him much earlier on in my distance from the Jmac world. In some ways by doing so it kind of felt like i was betraying the church...lol. Because of some residuals from the Strange Fire motifs still resonating in my soul. I still cherish that child like heart of JD's and honestly sometimes marvel at it. Because as some know, I have some issues there too. I bring this up not to tout ministries but rather just a chime in of kind of where i am at. But also for another reason. To "strengthen" a pinch on something I had shared here that did resonate with your heart in Christ dear sister.

"There is a tendency to merge genuine political care with Christian Nationalism and NAR. And I would see a lack of distinction there as very unhealthy. And allowing the spirit of the age to blur the lines."

. . . . .

So there something a bit more i would say in this direction on this topic. But only where it might merit reason too. Otherwise it could come across in wonky ways it need not to. The best way to frame this is that on another thread i posted a Michael Heiser video of Naaman the Leper. Heiser is someone I've liked because of his pushing the envelope. But honestly don't share his enochion views at all. But what so impressed me about his take on Naaman was what Elisha honored in the man's inquiry. Naaman was concerned that after what happened to him in cleansing was without question affirming the God of Elisha. But back at home he served a leader where Naaman had a principled position associated with some of that leaders religious practices. And Naaman was concerned if that was going to be an issue with Elisha's God in light of Naaman's healing. And Elisha understood the situation Naaman was in in his office and seem to give him a pass.

Now in that, I don't think what Elisha meant was that it was ok to serve other God's. But what it did seem to arouse in the text was that God knew Naaman's heart, and understood temple related associations. This was a much different POV than lets say Daniel and his refusal. I believe the duties of Naaman may not have been overt gestures of worship, but duties under the crown...not a command to worship a king or (g)od. In addition, Naaman was singled out by Christ as the only Leper healed even though there were many Jews that had leprosy. Causing the Jews hearing that to been really mad at Jesus.

Maybe you have your views on that. And i don't mean for this insert here to detour from the purpose of this thread (for the most part i have stayed in my lane here). But because of where we are in our day and age and how this sort of thing resonates, I would hope for the allowance of this mini sandbar side highlight in relation to such grand themes as Christian Nationalism, NAR, the religion of politics and even strong stances against politics in general. And hopefully that this posture here merely underscore considerations in the generic mix and troubles of our day.

How Heiser's Naaman take and this whole NAR and Christian Nationalism thing strikes me is like this: Naaman's healing was a rebuke to disobedient Israel. In a kind of inverse way I would see Paula White or Kenneth Copeland or Doug Wilson. Not in the positive but negative sense. Like realizing the folly of such heretical grandstanding become so much even a part of the greater extenuating culture. In that, I would say though too that those of a reformed perspective have been gaslitten into their views. On some levels, the USA thrived initially under reformed aspirations of this land in the USA to become perhaps the epicenter of the 1,000 year reign to come.

Now that is not a position i would agree with. But in their blind spots they provided a coming haven for Jews free from global persecution. So on that note, dominions was used by God to help give Jews solace from worldwide persecution. I don't exactly fault reformeds who view dominionism as eschatology proper. I think they are dead wrong. And exegetically heretical. But that denomination is a lot bigger than NAR. And has been around for at least 500 years. Because you and I and those on our forum have a more sober eschatology, I believe we can great comfort that however ill informed eschatologies might operate around us, we can be sure that to whatever effect they believe they are doing right, our great God will use it for His purposes. And one of them today i can think of is to empower Israel. Like through the Abraham Accords.

Obviously I don't believe all people sharing under the banner of Abraham should unite religiously. No. But if we know our God is greater than the trends of the world, we also know that God could very well tap many Muslims on the shoulder regarding their understanding of Abraham. Allowing some to see a super rise in Abrahamic attention for evangelicalism might seem mostly blasphemous. But if God might use lower hanging fruit of "remember Abraham" as an inroad to the Muslim heart (regardless how evangelicals view Arab history--regardless because of Abraham the Arab world had the strength of the Ottoman Empire and now super power through oil), these cultural formings in the hands of our mighty God, could also likely be used by Him (as we have seen now for a decade or so the immeasurable mad dash from the Muslim faith to Christ as we have seen now--possibly also a taunt to unbelieving Israel), there are things and themes in our world we might label all over the place but their value in His hands far transcend our ways to process their overarching value be somewhat limited or blindsided, perhaps be somewhat of a takeaway in just how God wanted to use Naaman.

In general i believe that it is good we have our stances and convictions. But some of the themes we make of them can become crusades of our own. And I just think that Naaman is a great reminder of that. A great humbler toward that end. If that makes sense too though in ways perhaps? Blessings.
 
Back
Top