Everlasting Life
By grace, through faith in Jesus
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/meta-ceo-mark-zuckerberg/2023/07/24/id/1128277/
Amid reported Meta refusals to comply with congressional oversight of Big Tech censorship, the House Judiciary Committee is reportedly weighing a potential Thursday vote on a contempt of Congress referral on Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to the Justice Department.
Myriad government agencies have been exposed by the Twitter Files to have conspired with allies at Big Tech social media companies to throttle down, censor, and even suspend accounts sharing opinions the Biden administration disagrees with....
.....[Jim Jordan shared,] "Since the committee's subpoena to Meta, we have obtained additional evidence that the federal government has coerced or colluded with technology, social media, and other companies to moderate content online," the letter read, giving a July 31 deadline for a response. "These examples reinforce the committee's serious concerns about whether the Executive Branch is engaging in censorship by proxy — using surrogates to censor, suppress, or discourage speech in a manner that the government is unable to do itself.
"In fact, on July 4, 2023, a federal court held that the government's collusion with and coercion of social media platforms to censor disfavored speech appeared to have violated the plaintiffs' First Amendment rights, and issued a preliminary injunction against government defendants.....
Amid reported Meta refusals to comply with congressional oversight of Big Tech censorship, the House Judiciary Committee is reportedly weighing a potential Thursday vote on a contempt of Congress referral on Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to the Justice Department.
Myriad government agencies have been exposed by the Twitter Files to have conspired with allies at Big Tech social media companies to throttle down, censor, and even suspend accounts sharing opinions the Biden administration disagrees with....
.....[Jim Jordan shared,] "Since the committee's subpoena to Meta, we have obtained additional evidence that the federal government has coerced or colluded with technology, social media, and other companies to moderate content online," the letter read, giving a July 31 deadline for a response. "These examples reinforce the committee's serious concerns about whether the Executive Branch is engaging in censorship by proxy — using surrogates to censor, suppress, or discourage speech in a manner that the government is unable to do itself.
"In fact, on July 4, 2023, a federal court held that the government's collusion with and coercion of social media platforms to censor disfavored speech appeared to have violated the plaintiffs' First Amendment rights, and issued a preliminary injunction against government defendants.....
