What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

FBI, CIA Apprehend Key Suspect In 2012 Benghazi Attack, Bondi Vows To Hunt Down Others

TCC

Well-known

Many mysteries still surround the 2012 attack on the American consulate and nearby CIA outpost in Benghazi, Libya which led to the deaths of four Americans, including US Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens.

On Friday, the Trump administration heralded a major break in one of the worst terror attacks on a US diplomatic compound in history. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced in a press conference the arrest of a culprit allegedly behind the attack. Zubayar al-Bakoush has already been extradited to the United States, landing at Andrews Air Forces base, and is facing murder, arson and terrorism related charges.
 

Many mysteries still surround the 2012 attack on the American consulate and nearby CIA outpost in Benghazi, Libya which led to the deaths of four Americans, including US Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens.

On Friday, the Trump administration heralded a major break in one of the worst terror attacks on a US diplomatic compound in history. Attorney General Pam Bondi announced in a press conference the arrest of a culprit allegedly behind the attack. Zubayar al-Bakoush has already been extradited to the United States, landing at Andrews Air Forces base, and is facing murder, arson and terrorism related charges.
OH MY!!!

That is a very dangerous trail that will lead DIRECTLY to Hilary Clinton, former State Secretary. She famously blew off the early investigations with some irritated statement like "what does it all matter anyway"

and I remember a lot of the evidence piling up surrounding her at that time, and how conveniently it all went away. And how it never showed up in her presidential bid for supreme power.

Pray for Pam Bondi. No matter what we think of her general competence regards the Epstein files, (already a dangerous case to work on) she is being very public about this and Hilary and Bill still have a lot of power, not to mention some awfully convenient "suicides" in their respective backgrounds. Pam Bondi's life or her credibility or both are on the line now.

The lives of any witnesses also on the line!
 
Plus how this might leads to Obama. Perhaps.

Thanks for chiming in Margery. Yeah this kind of thing right here has me wonder if this is the kind of strategy unfolding, then Pam's buffoonery may well indeed be a potential calculated psyop against the deep state's state of mind. If we think of it in a backward engineering sense, and you know what people you can capture. And you know the depth of the details coming out, perhaps you might seem proportionately as much as a dingbat or wishy-washy (Kasth) or incompetent (Bondi)...in proportion to the level of radioactive certainty you have avalanching. In that sense, if for example the Epstein files (no one thought to see) first batch has eating people in it...we can only wonder what was held back and perhaps soon coming. In a way i think it is strategic more than levels of debauchery (although likely both with a hot focus on strategic reveal because that is more necessary for timing and how those disclosures would effect society and a likelihood of being able to do anything about it regarding). If that makes sense.

Anyway, yeah its like one of those things that goes with: The Clinton's will never see justice. And this as a trope for our age. We know it is like that. And since the Clintons are kind of the quintessential essence of that -- if they go down...it then becomes one huge bon fire...fire sale perhaps. Interesting to see the subtle squeeze though currently building...that is for sure. Blessings.
 
Plus how this might leads to Obama. Perhaps.

Thanks for chiming in Margery. Yeah this kind of thing right here has me wonder if this is the kind of strategy unfolding, then Pam's buffoonery may well indeed be a potential calculated psyop against the deep state's state of mind. If we think of it in a backward engineering sense, and you know what people you can capture. And you know the depth of the details coming out, perhaps you might seem proportionately as much as a dingbat or wishy-washy (Kasth) or incompetent (Bondi)..."in proportion to the level of radioactive certainty you have avalanching. In that sense, if for example the Epstein files (now one thought to see) first batch has eating people in it...we can only wonder what was held back and perhaps soon coming. In a way i think it is strategic more than levels of debauchery (although likely both with a hot focus on strategic reveal because that is more necessary for timing and how those disclosures would effect society and a likelihood of being able to do anything about regarding. If that makes sense.

Anyway, yeah its like one of those things that goes with: The Clinton's will never see justice. And this as a trope for our age. We know it is like that. And since the Clintons are kind of the quintessential essence of that -- if they go down...it then becomes one huge bon fire...fire sale perhaps. Interesting to see the subtle squeeze though currently building...that is for sure. Blessings.
If the Clintons (and Obama for that matter) ever do go down in a blazing bonfire, it will be because the globalists have decided that they are worth more burnt up in the bonfire, than propping them up in power. Which might mean that the globalists are betting on the Conservative pendulum swing, and using said bonfire to create a sense that whoever is on the conservative side of the aisle is on the side of truth and justice.

I'm a bit cynical- I think that the globalists on the conservative right wing are just as compromised as the left ever was. Only due to the media love for the left, and the popular sentiment pulling to the right, the right wing is better concealed. Bush Jr and Sr spring to mind. Both embraced globalist causes sometimes at the same event warmly welcoming the Obamas.

The only one on the side of Truth and Justice, is God and He is working thru the Holy Spirit moving in the church, The Restrainer. The effective fervent prayer of a righteous man DOES avail much. God will tear away the lies and reveal the truth at the exact right time. The Clintons and their helpers will see justice eventually. Meanwhile they are part of that stage setting that is going on.
 
If the Clintons (and Obama for that matter) ever do go down in a blazing bonfire, it will be because the globalists have decided that they are worth more burnt up in the bonfire, than propping them up in power. Which might mean that the globalists are betting on the Conservative pendulum swing, and using said bonfire to create a sense that whoever is on the conservative side of the aisle is on the side of truth and justice.

I'm a bit cynical- I think that the globalists on the conservative right wing are just as compromised as the left ever was. Only due to the media love for the left, and the popular sentiment pulling to the right, the right wing is better concealed. Bush Jr and Sr spring to mind. Both embraced globalist causes sometimes at the same event warmly welcoming the Obamas.

The only one on the side of Truth and Justice, is God and He is working thru the Holy Spirit moving in the church, The Restrainer. The effective fervent prayer of a righteous man DOES avail much. God will tear away the lies and reveal the truth at the exact right time. The Clintons and their helpers will see justice eventually. Meanwhile they are part of that stage setting that is going on.
Amen! This is my view as well. I don’t have trust in Republicans, Trump, or any politician to lead our Nation to our knees in repentance. The church in this country has fallen into so much Apostasy. The remnant of Bible believers seems small in comparison.
 
INTRO

Thanks ladies for your thoughtful comments on this thread. I'm going to post an article here if its ok. I will explain why below. But first, I would like to take this opportunity to break something down a bit in light of views shared here in this thread. I would like to hopefully make some clearer distinctions to consider that may not come to be represented much or made even aware that they might be as such consideration worthy. But from what I have seen over the years are somewhat, to me, precious like gold…potentially. The following are themes I don’t see made very often. But have had to come to discover for myself to some degree or another over some banging of head against the wall like seasons.

Yes, it would be folly to place hope in MAGA philosophy or politicians, amen. But I would suggest a few differences here from how I have painstakingly somewhat had to have my face rearranged over (metaphorically) to discover.

Perhaps things at this point are going to get likely a wee bit more complicated politically in our world. Our age can tend to feel like we are walking down a dark alley and our close to home/heart views and perspectives become somewhat seemingly jumped by not so well detailed foreign ideologies. An example: The Clintons Turning Themselves In.

THESIS

@Margery I agree with your stated concerns here. As also with @Cheeky200386 . And I understand that on some level, if the globalists don’t need the Clinton’s anymore they will be sacrificed. I also agree that globalism has deep roots into the conservative perspective, as you have well noticed in the Bush’s, amen. So the globalists infiltrate either side in the event the political pendulum swings. Good defensive strategy for them. But what I would like to uncover a bit more here in this post is more along the lines of why the pendulum is swinging conservatively, and some perhaps foreign features in all that, that, can tell a unique story possibly outside the lines.

Through the philosophical stubbing-of-toe moments that had occurred to me (confused as to what to make of this or that, socio-politically/prophetically) all along the sociopolitical/prophetic pathways presented to us in no short order since 2016, I have slowly come to believe that in order to wrap our arms around what to make of all the mess as something helpfully clarifying—and something comfortably real and clear enough to let into the house, would likely reside outside the layers of common bias, though. Something maybe challenging to us even "by design" to greet our age's biases (secular and church) "specifically." Tailor made perhaps even. with said bias slaying in mind.

So what I am interested to look at and hopful to display is:

(a) Why the conservative shift
(b) What said shift references for globalism
(c) How walking back biases may be key for clearest observation


THE HOPEFUL DEMYSTIFYING OF BIAS

Globalism as the Grand Architect -- In the masonic world the creator is the grand architect in masonic thinking. And is not the God we know of, the One responsible for creation. But as far as “children of the grand architect,” think, I don't exactly believe that globalism (or the masons) have as much a grip as we can tend to give them though. Cathrine Austin Fitts was in their world and knows there is a lot they don't control. And has shared that with social media now for several years. This could be a psyop of course. Yes, the world is in the lap of the evil one. But if God were going to do something unique in our day outside of the globalists, yet our main focus might often be to view most political events through what we more so understand to belong to the social architecture of the elites, how could we ever discover if God does something unique? It would just seem to always (or mostly) default to be merely some version of what globalists are "really" doing. This one feature i believe probably has the most self-evident characteristics beyond all the other points to consider. And hopefully a profound species of discernment in our day.

When I researched if America is a masonic product a few years back, I spent 40 to 50 solid hours within a months time studying the subject, and it is clear that there is just as much evidence against America being founded by elite/globalist minded individuals (and more, i believe) than to just go with notions of those who champion that America is the product of masonry. I realize you are not saying this. But what that view (America formed by Masons) and the view of the role of globalist today have in common is: they both share in the potential of granting globalists super human power potential. The potential approachment of super hero ability status.

Although it is of course a respectable concern to wonder how deep the globalists rabbit hole goes, we do have some voices like Cathrine Austin Fitts, who defeated globalist overreach in her own life. And attests they are strong, but have many weak areas. She believes they can be overcome. Whereas a common tendency of prophesy watching in our era would almost consider Austin-Fitts views as anathema. Just saying. Personally, I believe the globalist choke-hold moment over American personified in the execution of JFK. I believe in general globalism needed some time to ramp up in the USA. It would seem JFK era to be a pivotal point for this. Since that time it would seem right/left became far more mutually steered by globalism.

Either America is A Christian Nation and God Is Making Her Great Again/Or This is All Deception I believe there are two main types of bad faith conservative actors (one toxic and one just led astray). The toxic one is “rep in name only—rino.” And the led astray version seems to be someone who wants to see the good virtues of America succeed. But might be a little too deep into the temporal cool-aide served to where it blinds them from seeing other considerations going on. The thick headed boomer age, for example. Someone still in stages of wanting the best for America but becomes increasingly compromised along the way. I believe this kind of understanding about how conservatives who stray are not all in cahoots with globalism. Some follow blindly I believe out of ignorance. Some out of good will but being tainted. I believe also though there are conservative leaders that are not under the influence of globalism. From this I would say that it is every bit likely that these variants and factions are as real as moves globalist use as strategies. There are both though I would see. The wild frontier associated with human free will, and master plans of elites. Both existing (but not necessarily mutually) side by side. Perhaps what bests suggests there are conservative leaders that have free will enterprise outside of globalist reach is the strategy employed to have DEA Hires. If globalism owned everything, globalists could function fine manipulating professionals who know what they are doing. But DEA hires exist, I believe, because professionals could easily spot what does not belong to protocol in their trade. This would speak to the “fraction/faction” theory as perhaps the more wild west real world snap shot capture for time capsule moment consideration, I believe.

As to whether America is or was a Christian nation OR what we see forming is deception—I am not suggesting dear sisters that you might be suggesting this at all. I am just trying to paragraph sections to be understood as a whole in consideration of what is hopeful structure for my likely even more over aching thesis: Discernment Could Likely Be that Which On Purpose is Outside the Constraints of Colloquial Bias—a theory. Something in which we had spoken of previously regarding…which I would see we are in agreement regarding in some ways. But I believe the temptation will always be there for us to potentially revert to concerns of what the “Mr. Globalist,” as Austin-Fitts calls them, is up to. And of course good to keep an eye-on. But only one eye, I’d say. Because of what the other eye likely also sees: What if God wants to use America to bless Israel to setup Eze 38? That version of MAGA might be entirely real, I believe. Or stated in a more bias free radical way: What if MAGA is for Israel more than America?
This postulate (MAGA = an empowered Israel) does not seem to come up very often in the watcher world. I think I have seen it twice. But only as a shadow thought. Something to note but has no real magnitude in world events. Whereas, in light of my thesis, I would suggest that it is not shadow. And the ramifications are louder than MAGA and Trump world dominance perspectives. Transcending all of that, I would suggest that MAGA to seat Israel on top of the bucking bronco world. I like to say it that way, because those who see Trump as installing the New new world order I would see are perhaps a decade early. Would it not seem odd for a prophecy watching channel to say this:

“ladies and gentlemen (like Amir), I believe what we are likely witnessing today is that Trump and Maga will become very very powerful. And that Trump will exult Israel to super SUPER status. And those who look at this as some diabolical plan are thinking far too temporally. Because its not about us.”

Could you imagine how well that would go over? Lol. But yeah to see that we would have to throw a lot of bias over the cliff. But if that is the direction, we already see how incredibly hard it is for anyone to actually be on that page. So maybe that is because I am tripping and don’t see reality. Or maybe that is because perhaps bias won’t trend to let us consider. Just saying.

A Leader Must Be Good & Moral to Be of Iconic Import Demonstrating Our General Overall Direction in the World Today -- I believe it is helpful to consider that JFK was killed in respect to an age ready for disclosure. It does not matter that he was a democrat, or that he was a playboy in order to be I believe quite a huge “age we are in marker.” The age of 'lifting the veil." I don't mean that in a new age sense. Just in the sense that the JFK era was ready to pull some covers off those secret societies. And then he got shot.

THEN THIS... -- So if that last point is possible, then it would seem that God would use MAGA or conservatives or Trump to bring those ends to make America great. Not because God loves rifles, family, and conservatives. But because He might use America prophetically for Israel. With Israel getting so much attention (good and bad) these days, it just seems that this would be more likely than less, at least. And if that is the case, perhaps grounding is helpful here and might be to see if Trump is used in ways that empower America and Israel. This is somewhat respectfully different than this current discussion—As trusting politicians is an understandable contrast to hoping in them too much (as we see exists). But maybe it is like trusting God with perhaps their roles. Even if they are not on God's side. I guess that would kind of be my sub-thesis: The Art of Seeing the Value God Might Place on Trump (and value that to a great degree because of who God is) and Not Be Swallowed By A Psyop or Mistake What God is Doing is What Trump is Doing. Could you imagine that thesis be one in any watcher circle today? It just seems alien to me. I just hope if that is a relative position, it starts to dawn on the watcher channels. Not to have need to understand the deep things of prophecy and be the premier seat of it. On the contrary, quite the other way around I believe, if true: If God is actually making the fruit hang this insanely low, and the watcher movement never sees it? But we see all this other stuff? Lol. It would not be an I told you so moment. It would be more likely: “Like how much easier could it have been to see for anyone?” lol.

On that note just for the record, I believe the church is the children of providence and not prophesy. I would see Israel as the children of prophesy…this is just how it comes across to me. But with providence, the church gets to be His Bride. A standing higher order than prophet. This is why I believe that providence in the church is kind of prophecy. Not a different one. Just the delivery system echoes in providence through general revelation. Something the churh might not be all to comfortable with. And if so, understood and respected. But just saying that I am not advocating that those who have eyes to see will agree with me (as some might use that tone toward others in the watcher world). Rather, I am just suggesting that anyone can see it if we want—if it truly is providence. I just think it comes with a bias removal service that is rather uncomfortable. At least it was/is for me. So just saying if this ends up being true it would have been God making things utterly stupid simple while perhaps the church might be looking for larger, more sophisticated? Perhaps. But maybe providence is suppose to contrast a measure of prophetic views. To me, its seems on purpose. I just think there could be a lot of interesting discussions in the watcher world if worshipping Trump were not so much a concern so as to have to run the other way. Not that you ladies or this forum are suggesting that. This forum is awesome for being open to various considerations, amen. Just saying for example: It helps our bias if Trump comes out with a bible so we don’t trust that cat. Meanwhile he gives Israel popeye (not psyop) spinach. And perhaps is the most noteable figure in world history when it comes to the ending of the age of grace. Somone we are really “not suppose to care about on any level like that, because after all, the guy printed his own bible and thinks he is the second coming of God.” See how in this sense it could challenges bias on purpose, possibly, if true or approaching true?

Another Example of Super Challenging Bias Consideration Perhaps: Elon Musk will likely design a chip for our brains that will be used in the tribulation. Right now though, he has at least been a general force for more open media. Even there Elon has issues. But he did buy twitter at a loss with getting tarred and feathered for months over it. Did not need it. Sure it will likely be used in tribulation as total mind control. But if the utility of Elon today is only or mainly "he will do devilish things in the tribulation." Or if the greatest value of what "The Board of Peace" means relates to the coming trib (like the 10 nation confederacy perhaps with some there who have no country rule), more than lets say what it means in the age of grace for us today, then i just think it is good and healthy to consider that perhaps the most sober Christian discernment be along the lines of both equally focus as intensely as the other. What is forming and what later likely follows because of. But it just seems we can tend to see him mostly through the eyes of what a man like that might mean as we approach the tribulation.

Point being that because there seems to clearly be two very different utilities (the use of things as they are today & the use of things becoming what they will in the tribulation age) I believe we can tend to be primed on the one we can see ahead. But often (as in the general watcher world) have rather abscent takes if anything on what it might value out as today. If God uses Elon to bring some level of free-er speech temporarily for events God might be using prophetically perhaps, to me, this would seem to be the more important one to notice than someday Elon will chip our whole family. As an example of what I am hopefully expressing.

Perhaps this sort of thing is because the things outside our front door are likely a lot less exiting than the fireworks going off at the beach lets say. But to the degree God might grant us awareness today, i believe relates to reasons why "for today" also He might. This one idea “that there may be prophetic value concering people and events as it soley relates to the age of grace, dispite its alternative value in the tribulation age to come” is likely a huge moving target and does not sit well in anyone’s place for long. But it would seem to be key to have in our bag of discernables.

CONCLUSION

It is on the wings of that that i bring this article to post. This is a very controversial subject. My reason for posting it is not to give any psyop power. But quite the opposite. Perhaps the hardest POV I can recall being challenged with all along the way = this: Is it possible that all levels of temporal insight are on one side of the equation (this might radically but gently and sweetly also include the churches understanding of prophecy—on certain fronts, at least), and God on the other? Meaning that is it possible that in some sense we can flatten and neutralize all temporal intel in some sense as one category (or of one species – those perspectives that are not absolutely organically God’s perspective or active will in doing this or that) and on the other side, it be...God and what He is doing? Or what creature did He not make? To which of His creations can be so removed from Him or His reach (like Jonah tried to run from --Jonah 2), or to which insidious plan orchestrates its Moxy beyond His reach into its event unfolding (Esther 7:10)? So i guess it is perhaps somehow possible that God might use any manner of ingredient of His creation to meme today. Yet, it just seems like we might tend to align most meme-ing with the grand architects abilities and its licensure today. I guess i would just stress a spiritual exercise that might transcend the mere enemies hand in it all...even as a recent posted verse truly fleshes out too: "10 So they hanged Haman on the gallows that he had prepared for Mordecai. Then the king’s wrath subsided." In a day and age where Haman hangs others not himself, it is understandable we might see irony as grand architecture. But if there is something of today in irony, it could be easy to be somewhat caught on the wrong side of that, in theory.

I admit considering the potential of just how far outside our bias God might be moving is not as exciting as what things end up looking like approaching the tribulation. Considering along these lines would also not allow for quick answers or click bait insights. But if the book of Job is true, then on some level this post would have to fit somewhere because of the great (beyond grand) nature of Him who created all. So it is on that note and a thousand words, I offer this article. Some might see this as a psyop. But what if we had a psyop eater in the backyard. That we could just let off the leash and let it eat what was coming at us on the front lawn? I believe we might. I do not believe that God will show us all things at all times. Of course not. But if we show diligent heart toward "sober" today, He likely might show us more than our meeting it with indifference. So right here is the tip of a radioactive toxic spear (I believe): Can God use Psyop? lol. Like who asks such a question. What I mean is, might God use even psyops apparent ability to inform us of even what is going on today? Might God use a thing that is not, like some psyop so many people stumble onto by which to worship Trump through (qanon), to shame the things that are (which could include on any level, perhaps our own biases). Was Q accurate to proclaim a day and time we live in as being ran by Santanic pedophiles? And might our knowing how psyopy Q was itself be a polite and safe engine (Q being so over-the-top it is easy to ignore, dismiss, or belittle) by which to ease this awareness into the public psyche? Through something cartoonish we know is (a) not a prophet, and (b) something even that tore church members from sounder biblical approaches. Can something of that magnitude (contrasting sober sensibilities & even present a danger to the church) also be (c) a mode of communication helping the church to see its fragile state today, as well as (d) be used also to let us know how dark the world is (and has been for decades) for it to be on notice as the tribulation generation? A way of helping the world and the church together to discover the real heart and core functionalities of our world at large today? And how evil it really is: as a helpful mode to show, clarify, warn, and articulate what time it really is? Not that we relly on psyops as ways in which we get our news…lol. Heavens no. But just how “bias” challenging it is if God Himself might permit or use even a psyop to declare sober reality to the world. Because if that is accurate, I believe it does suggest quite a convincing relevance as the church being children of providence. Thanks for reading all of that. Blessings.

 
why the pendulum is swinging conservatively, and some perhaps foreign features in all that,
So what I am interested to look at and hopful to display is:

(a) Why the conservative shift
(b) What said shift references for globalism
(c) How walking back biases may be key for clearest observation
Why the shift? Because it works. The shift to the left worked too for it's time and season. The current shift to the right is taking advantage of the anger towards open borders and other craziness. I don't think the left could move as quickly towards technocracy for example but the swing to the right allows a lot of things that masquerade as right wing such as govt efficiency to be put in place without much delay.

Most of the right wing doesn't see the globalist ties within the Right, they only see evil on the Left. And as the shift to the right happens (in response to idiocy and evil on the Left) the enemy doesn't miss a beat.

Personally, I believe the globalist choke-hold moment over American personified in the execution of JFK. I believe in general globalism needed some time to ramp up in the USA. It would seem JFK era to be a pivotal point for this. Since that time it would seem right/left became far more mutually steered by globalism.
I agree! That timeline of events seemed to suddenly worsen in the post WW2 era with the JFK assassination.

Something else- the Masonic and Globalist plots simply end up doing the very thing they hoped they could avoid, and that is God's prophecies outlined millennia ago in Scripture.

I forget who it was who said that the devil is still God's devil, used by God even in his rebellion against God to bring about God's ultimate purpose which is to call out a people for Himself out all the dispensations. People who willingly choose Him.

I see the globalists and the Masons, the New Agers and the Luciferians as merely playing out the prophecies without understanding how God moves and works. They have free will, they use it to rebel against God, but ultimately their choices end up like Judas- whose betrayal of Christ led up to the Cross and the greatest defeat of Satan and his puppets of all time.

What if God wants to use America to bless Israel to setup Eze 38? That version of MAGA might be entirely real, I believe. Or stated in a more bias free radical way: What if MAGA is for Israel more than America?
I see the MAGA trend used to protect Israel to a degree. I don't think MAGA is about Israel - it's purpose is to MAGA, not MIGA.

I think all these trends are in place to bring about prophetic fulfillment, not to make a particular nation great again even if that does happen. Because the making great again has a purpose, and an end goal that is about Israel, and Prophecy, not about making lives better in a particular country.

So if that last point is possible, then it would seem that God would use MAGA or conservatives or Trump to bring those ends to make America great. Not because God loves rifles, family, and conservatives. But because He might use America prophetically for Israel.
BINGO! Exactly!

If God uses Elon to bring some level of free-er speech temporarily for events God might be using prophetically perhaps, to me, this would seem to be the more important one to notice than someday Elon will chip our whole family.
YES!

Nobody is all good or all bad. That kind of thinking has problems on both sides. Elon, Trump, even Netanyahu. People like to paint them into corners- labels. But they are just men - some things they do are very good and some are potentially very bad. At ALL times they have free will but God knows their choices from before the universe was created and their choice both good AND bad WILL serve to bring about prophetic fulfillment and end up glorifying God.

Nebuchadnezzar for example was good in some ways for Israel, bad in some ways at the time, and God dealt with his pride, he went nuts for 7 years, then repented of his pride and God restored him. He ends his time in the Bible by belief in God. He destroyed a lot of lives, he led people to worship that statue and he did some awful stuff, but ended up being used by God to help us see thru Daniel, what the outline of history would be.

This is a very controversial subject. My reason for posting it is not to give any psyop power. But quite the opposite. Perhaps the hardest POV I can recall being challenged with all along the way = this: Is it possible that all levels of temporal insight are on one side of the equation (this might radically but gently and sweetly also include the churches understanding of prophecy—on certain fronts, at least), and God on the other?

I would say yes and no. Because our insights, locked into time and space have limits. We understand in part and God seems to allow this- the differences of opinion on how prophecy will play out for example.

BUT

GOD is NOT limited, and his prophecies will come to pass perfectly in their time.

PLUS God wants to communicate with us, that is why we have the Bible. God's truth in His Word is meant to be understood. The aim of communication is to communicate.

God fore knew that we would have difficulty understanding some things, and I think He expresses His Word more completely, with shades of meaning that different opinions bring to the text.

In other words, debate is ok, and differences may sharpen our understanding of His Word.

1 Cor 13:9-12

9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.

10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.

11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.

12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.
 
Oh and one more point about these shifts from right to left and back to right again. Look at the mega trends in history.

And you'll see the the mega shift to leftism occurs just before the Russian Revolution, this spreads to places like Indo China, Cuba, and China as well as parts of South America and Mexico. Via the Catholic Church in Spanish speaking areas.

This is happening about the same time period as Zionism takes hold and the Jews start coming back. Give or take 20-30 years. I'm looking at 100-150 year cycles.

There was kind of correction to the right wing that occurred in Europe in WW2 in Germany and Italy as the Nazis and the Fascists took power, but it was before their time, and things reverted back to the spread of Communism right after WW2 was over.

It's not precise. But if you sort of back up a long way and look at the overview you'll see that pendulum swing across the decades, and in fact across the centuries. And it involves world wide trends.

The pull to the right started in Reagan's presidency as the USSR fell apart and a lot of Europe was released from the death grip of Communism.

And I think the key is Israel and where we are at on the timeline counting down to the AC and the Trib (Rapture first of course).
 
Brother, respectfully, to say, "Either America is A Christian Nation and God Is Making Her Great Again/Or This is All Deception" is a logical fallacy, specifically the false dilemma fallacy. There are other options than the two presented. For example, God may be allowing America to be great again for His purposes in shaping the world in the direction He wishes it to go. Or He may be allowing America to be great again in order to ensure the protection of Israel for the current season in a world amassed against her. Or ... well you get the picture. When an argument begins with a fallse dilemma, everything that proceeds from that point is logically likely false.
 
Thank you Pastor for considering to read my post. I know I risk it not being read the longer it is. So its appreciated (and I am hopefully for the most part doing better with general length over all). There is quite a few things going on in my post. And I did sit on it for 3 days trying to provide a best approach. For the most part, I think i did get the core of ideas I wanted to share on the post. But I understand there are some areas that could have been better fleshed out.

In the paragraph you mention, I 100% agree brother. Normally when there are paragraphs with bold headings it would seem to be that is what that paragraph affirms. But in the body of the post there are three bold headers. Each bold paragraph lead is a bias to demystify, as I see it.

1. Globalism as the Grand Architect
2. Either America is A Christian Nation and God Is Making Her Great Again/Or This is All Deception
3. A Leader Must Be Good & Moral to Be of Iconic Import Demonstrating Our General Overall Direction in the World Today

What I am doing in that section (as well as others) is trying to provide like a banner of ideas that fall under "Demystifying Bias." No. 2 is a bolded paragraph lead in a set of three that is a way I have noted over time Christendom can tend to think like. Or at least i have seen it in ways. Now No. 2 is probably the more difficult section in my post. And i apologize for that because I was shooting for a layered approach. And in some ways i think I got some of that going on, but not so much in others. I will explain in my response to @Margery.

But here is how I understand what i was doing in No. 2:

a. I open the paragraph with an "assumed." The concerns @Margery and @Cheeky200386 have are of course very valid. In fact with @Cheeky200386 concern I would go as far as to say we are the church age of Laodicea in spades. I would heavily concur with her reasoning. But there is something I am contrasting in my post too. So I open with: The 2 kinds of bad faith conservative players. That is not to say there are no good faith ones. But the reason i hit the ground running on the point i did was somewhat reminiscent of the logical fallacy that stood out to you. Extending that logical fallacy onto the "conservative" movement. Pointing out that even though the right is ripe for globalist takeover, it is by no means a monolithic group or movement. It may seem so. But it is far less monolithic than the left. This is helpful to note in the greater over arcing point of interest for me: The Shift to the Right globalism does and may continue to do may be a strategy...but my emphasis in the post is perhaps something greater in sociopolitical/eschatological waters. Not just that globalism tries things. By the way Pastor, the fallacy you noticed is one of the main reason I wanted to write this post. Because there is a huge swath of watcher world culture that operate on that logical fallacy. It likely impacts, to me, the greater trending view points in the watcher world at larger(is kind of the concern i would have in it). .

b. DEA Hires -- here i conclude the first paragraph with a clarifier. At the paragraph onset i look at the non-monolithic nature of the right in seeing the differing modes of conservatives in general. And in this introductory paragraph (under bolded section No. 2) I use DEA Hire to inject a contrasting notion. In the beginning of the paragraph, I am trudging through the diverse group types that make up the conservative movement today. This speaks to the frail grasp globalism actually has on the right anyway. To further the "globalism has a frail grip on conservatives" notion, I inject DEA Hires as a symptom of how the agenda of globalism works in reference to political spectrum (right vs. left). Because the DEA Hire method is a globalism strategy that has tried to edge its way into the social order. It is hugely left leaning. But what do we have on the right to compare? Do the globalist have an inversion of DEA Hire mechanisms in place on the right? Not that i am ware of. But if anyone knows of one, this is a great place to discuss. So I see DEA HIre strategy as an evidence that globalist strategy "although has functioned primarily through left leaning agendas" is a huge earmark policy of intent. Globalists are afraid of reality. So they need "experts" that don't know anything and can be easily manipulated. Since this is a globalist trope, I point out DEA Hire as evidence that although globalism can masquerade as conservative, it is far more shallow water in conservative values that can much easier expose them (globalists), for globalists to try and hide in rino infrastructure can often be at odds with their very own shapeshifting social blueprint methods. And the DEA Hire is a powerful sample of that (along with transgenderism). Globalists want deep dark waters we can't see them as easily in. The DEA Hire is not just a left leaning ideology...its the DNA blueprint how to tank an empire. I have not seen its equivalent on the right.

c. Discernment Could Likely Be that Which On Purpose is Outside the Constraints of Colloquial Bias—a theory.

d. Pushing MAGA as MIGA. In this closing portion of section No. 2, I push MAGA as Make Israel Great Again. Not as a literal sense. Although there are growing numbers in Christendom who are at odds with Zionist concepts. Brother, what I noticed in my JDF days (2019-23) was a tendency to adopt the logical fallacy in section No. 2. There on that forum as well as in many expanding eschatological camps throughout the church as well. For most of the watcher world, America is not supposed to be in prophecy. I am ok if it is not. But as we know from previous posts, I believe America is likely very much in prophecy. Not because of Trump, rifles , family and country and apple pie. But because it seems God will likely use America to prop up Israel. Huge sections of the watcher camps don't seem to want America to have much of place in prophecy. On the outset, the idea is foreign to begin with. But to make America part of prophecy after years (maybe even a decade) of trying to do eschatology another way, is just a bridge too far for certain leading factions in eschatology. America has to seem bad, along with Trump. And if we get anything else wrong, there seems to be an emphasis not to get that wrong. So in a way, my post is overall speaking to this very issue. Not to make the case that God may be using America. Rather. My thesis is a bit more paper thin than that. It is just suggesting that it is highly likely that our biases might actually be indicators of what to in contrast look for.

Trying to prove that point is not something my post was hopeful to do. But just to open the door to considering that bias can be wrong...and even where it is wrong it could actually be hugely helpful in ways possibly. But bias left alone tends to bread species of eschatology that seem to tend to have huge blind spots. In the correspondence between @Margery and @Cheeky200386 there are some core concepts we defiantly agree upon. But as i hope to demonstrate in my response to Margery, there is slightly something different meant here. So, I tried to make that earlier large post of mine as short as possible using ideas in concentrate. Otherwise it would be likely 10 times the size. I guess i was expecting some hopeful dialogue in response to it. I'm not sure if much traction will go beyond our initial replies back and forth. But I don't think the core elements in consideration are going to be going anywhere anytime soon. So it could be something maybe to reference in the future. Hopefully this unfolds a bit more sense of "in part" what i was intending to do with that post. Blessings, and thanks for checking it out brother :)
 
Back
Top