TCC
Well-known
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.
www.youtube.com
This 15 minute video does not have a summary. This channel has been on youtube for 7 years and has now almost 2 million subscribers. The gist of the video is the problem of the USA using H1-B Immigration in the way that we have and to the degree we seem to unreasonably protect it. This channel is conservative and leans in favor of Trump admin views. However, it is a free thinking outside the box commentator who offers legitimate push back against staple ideologies even within his own party. In particular, in this video, this channel is concerned with Elon Musk's bans on twitter accounts that speak out against some H1-B practice.
. . . . .
Even though i generally think Elon Musk will help America move in a generally positive direction, I believe this is healthy push back against unreasonably oversensitive vibes coming from Elon's protection of H1-B status. And discusses the concerns of how America can still drown in immigration overload even though the borders may become better controlled and more secure under a Trump admin. If there are not addressed concerns in the H1-B practice in America, we are underselling our markets to immigration. And permitting America to be infiltrated by immigration that may not be the best for the country in general. And may end up hurting American jobs in general and losing too many jobs to immigration policy even under MAGA policy.
. . . . .
For those on our forum who tend to see politics through Hegelian Dialectic eyes, it is moments like these where i hope is helpful to see that even though i am a fairly assertive antagonist to the Hegelian Dialectic views held often in watcher circles, I try not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. And its moments like what this video brings up that does provide sober concern as to why Musk would be see himself standing for free speech and yet potentially pigeon-hole views he does not like on X. Like a cancel culturalist would do. I would think Musk's concern is overly sensitive. And a potential tipping of the hat to an Hegelian dialectic operation of sorts--by penalizing H1-B commentators (like Laura Loomer) on his own freedom-of-speech platform. And i believe holding Elon accountable in this way is super healthy.
So i am hopeful by this that in general i do believe Hegelian Dialectic views of politics are overly emphasized in theatrical glamorization's of political trends today, but also hope this does not mean i am not open to consider where it may happen -- as human nature seems to be a condition we all kind of share in. Even though my eschatological view is our witnessing of a massive surge revival in America and Israel, I try to do due diligence in not allowing my own eschatological leanings blur the realities that show up on our doorstep habitually, it may seem it most certainly can and often does. In general i would see 2025-2028 as a period subject to what i would consider a massive act of God (we shall see i reckon), but also in that I would perceive it healthy to hold my own convictions at bay to a degree too -- making other sober minded concerns along the way opportunity to prove of disprove my eschatological leanings. And this channel is at times a good example of this practice. A practice i would encourage in our watcher world that can tend to let our eschatology drives perhaps too much interpretation for us all along the way. Something i don't like when it see it practiced in the watcher world. Nor do i like it when i do it. It is an extremely uncomfortable way to hold a conviction. But i am just saying this in that even though i would see what could be an act of God override whatever else we might label it through the actions or inactions of its players (even though i would see that as an over arching theme beyond whatever else we may see things as), I would still want to give ample, reasonable, and sober minded shifts under my ideological feet to hold my own convictions to account. Because on its face, the what i would perceive often to be the generic watcher zeitgeist view that the NWO is "the" shot caller of our age, I would not want to inadvertently counterbalance that with a zeitgeist of my own, my "act of God" view. It would be inconsistent for me to say my zeitgeist trumps the watcher zeitgeist. So like as i am aware of this potential philosophical dysfunction, I would rather put videos like this one in front and center view. Where concerns and discussions emerge out of sober concerns not tilting too far on either zeitgeist like extreme. lol. If that makes sense? Thanks for reading. Blessings.