And he causes all… to be given a mark… and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell…” (Revelation 13:16-17).
When most people imagine the Beast system, they picture something sudden—a dramatic flip of a switch where the Antichrist unveils a fully formed global control grid. Scripture gives a different impression: a system that already has scaffolding, already has “rails,” already has the plumbing installed—so that when the final authority arrives, the mechanism is ready.
That’s why the most important question isn’t, “Has Revelation 13 happened yet?” but rather: Are the enabling systems being built now?
In recent years, the world has accelerated into a new governance paradigm that increasingly treats human autonomy as a problem to be managed, and technology (especially AI) as the tool to manage it. This aligns cleanly with a classic Hegelian dialectic:
Phase 1: Thesis — Human Autonomy and Order
The baseline condition assumes people can live with meaningful freedom:
But over the last decade, institutions increasingly emphasize the quiet counter-narrative: humans are biased, emotional, misinformed, and dangerous if left unchecked.
That sets up the pivot: if humans can’t be trusted to govern themselves, then governance must be automated, centralized, and enforced—not by persuasion, but by systems.
www.raptureready.com
When most people imagine the Beast system, they picture something sudden—a dramatic flip of a switch where the Antichrist unveils a fully formed global control grid. Scripture gives a different impression: a system that already has scaffolding, already has “rails,” already has the plumbing installed—so that when the final authority arrives, the mechanism is ready.
That’s why the most important question isn’t, “Has Revelation 13 happened yet?” but rather: Are the enabling systems being built now?
In recent years, the world has accelerated into a new governance paradigm that increasingly treats human autonomy as a problem to be managed, and technology (especially AI) as the tool to manage it. This aligns cleanly with a classic Hegelian dialectic:
- Thesis (problem): Human autonomy and decentralized life
- Antithesis (reaction): AI as threat and savior (engineered tension)
- Synthesis (solution): “Managed AI” + human submission via centralized controls
Phase 1: Thesis — Human Autonomy and Order
The baseline condition assumes people can live with meaningful freedom:
- personal responsibility
- local governance
- moral accountability
- organic creativity and commerce
- the ability to move, speak, and transact without constant permission
But over the last decade, institutions increasingly emphasize the quiet counter-narrative: humans are biased, emotional, misinformed, and dangerous if left unchecked.
That sets up the pivot: if humans can’t be trusted to govern themselves, then governance must be automated, centralized, and enforced—not by persuasion, but by systems.
Dialectic of Dominion :: By Joe Hawkins
“And he causes all… to be given a mark… and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell…” (Revelation 13:16-17). When most people imagine the