Even amongst her grieving, she did manage to say last night “Go Ducks”. Charlie was a huge supporter of the Oregon Ducks football team.
Christian Community Forum
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!
Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University.
- Thread starter Ronnie
- Start date
Charlie Kirk Assassin Lived With Transgender Partner
In a disturbing development following the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, sources now reveal that alleged shooter Tyler Robinson was living with a transgender partner at the time of the attack. According to individuals familiar with the investigation, the partner — a biological male transitioning to female — has been cooperating fully with federal authorities.Sources say the FBI obtained text messages and other communications between Robinson and this individual, which helped confirm Robinson’s identity as the shooter. These digital records reportedly played a key role in the early stages of the investigation, allowing federal agents to move quickly and secure evidence.
While details of the investigation have been sparse, this latest information raises further questions about the political and social environment that may have influenced the 22-year-old alleged shooter. Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative and outspoken critic of gender ideology, has been a frequent target of left-wing activists and mainstream media hostility. The fact that the alleged killer was in a domestic relationship that directly intersects with one of today’s most hotly contested cultural issues — transgender identity — cannot be ignored.
Charlie Kirk Assassin Lived With Transgender Partner
Details emerge about Charlie Kirk's assassin and their transgender partner amidst political tensions.
townhall.com
If these medical transitions create individuals who become a threat to the public, the transitions should be criminalized to protect the public.
TCC
Well-known
Since there have been numerous reports of this event leaking out a day before (or days before), such as New York and Los Angeles times providing headlines a day before the event took place that Kirk had been shot and killed before he even arrived at the school, it would seem this to be a collective effort. And if a collective effort, the assissin would have been groomed. And if groomed, it is interesting to note it is in proximity to transgednerism.Charlie Kirk Assassin Lived With Transgender Partner
In a disturbing development following the assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, sources now reveal that alleged shooter Tyler Robinson was living with a transgender partner at the time of the attack. According to individuals familiar with the investigation, the partner — a biological male transitioning to female — has been cooperating fully with federal authorities.
Sources say the FBI obtained text messages and other communications between Robinson and this individual, which helped confirm Robinson’s identity as the shooter. These digital records reportedly played a key role in the early stages of the investigation, allowing federal agents to move quickly and secure evidence.
While details of the investigation have been sparse, this latest information raises further questions about the political and social environment that may have influenced the 22-year-old alleged shooter. Charlie Kirk, a prominent conservative and outspoken critic of gender ideology, has been a frequent target of left-wing activists and mainstream media hostility. The fact that the alleged killer was in a domestic relationship that directly intersects with one of today’s most hotly contested cultural issues — transgender identity — cannot be ignored.
Charlie Kirk Assassin Lived With Transgender Partner
Details emerge about Charlie Kirk's assassin and their transgender partner amidst political tensions.
If these medical transitions create individuals who become a threat to the public, the transitions should be criminalized to protect the public.
To the extent now that I am wondering if that is like in the minds of mad scientisit in how to cultivate the perfect soldier. We tend to equate that with Robocop and iRobot or some great automated Rambo. But in the use (by contrast) of low tech...weaponized in the age of psychological operations and cyber warfare techniques (you can down a nation now without stepping one military foot in it at all)...perhaps that is what transgenderism actually is...lol. A psyop sold to the people as having a reason to exist.
Meanwhile, aside from all that bunk 100 gender theology that came with it, it's "secret--in the background" reason for being "a thing" could be that they make the best candidates for MKUltra like subjects. Perhaps prime people for most controllable assets to influence and channel right underneath socieities nose. A perfect cover for "rules for radicals" like concept soldier creation in a psychological warfare environment (sell them tough guy AI bots as perfect soldiers idealogy/BUT really...while in contrast, manufacture psychological warfare opportunities through a socially acceptable experiment).
Seems kind of like the transgendered is as the disposable test monkey for pyschological assissin warfare (or influential desirables) maybe. At least it seems with all the data that a case in this direction could be made. This is probably a stretch. But certainly not more than the hundreds of genders and pronoun demands society bought for a good chunk of time. Plus I read this guy was trolling fuzzies. And we all know, that is just, wrong. Blessings.
TCC
Well-known
Its hard to tell on some things if real today, for sure. But i did see quite a few videos coming out yesterday on Los Angeles Times and New York Times headlines coming out in advance of the shotting, like a day before. In the case of Amazon, it appears a book came out before the shooting on the shooting. And from what i understand its appearance was on the day before. And from what i understand, it takes 3 days of review before Amazon will post the listing.
I know you are not into watching videos that may or may not have too much spin, but this one i am not familiar with is an example of all of this. It has almost 1 million subs. So not exactly a random channel. And seems to have its own agenda and focus, certainly outside this controversial issue. In the interim, if i find something in print of value, I will post it for what it might be worth if that is ok with forum guidlines. Blessings.
Link removed by admin.
There is an article on the Amazon account (as well as NYT and LAT). But even there, their explanation of a Sept 9th posting date sounds a bit fishy...lol
Fact Check: 'The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk' Book Was NOT Published On Amazon By 'Anastasia J. Casey' Day Before Kirk Shooting
Was "The Shooting Of Charlie Kirk" book published by "Anastasia J. Casey" the day before Kirk was shot and killed in Utah? No, that's not true: An Amazon spokesperson told Lead Stories the title was published in the late afternoon...
Do we really want this forum to become a “out there” conspiracy theory board?Its hard to tell on some things if real today, for sure. But i did see quite a few videos coming out yesterday on Los Angeles Times and New York Times headlines coming out in advance of the shotting, like a day before. In the case of Amazon, it appears a book came out before the shooting on the shooting. And from what i understand its appearance was on the day before. And from what i understand, it takes 3 days of review before Amazon will post the listing.
I know you are not into watching videos that may or may not have too much spin, but this one i am not familiar with is an example of all of this. It has almost 1 million subs. So not exactly a random channel. And seems to have its own agenda and focus, certainly outside this controversial issue. In the interim, if i find something in print of value, I will post it for what it might be worth if that is ok with forum guidlines. Blessings.
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.www.youtube.com
dwb
Well-known
That's amazing!
pixelpusher
Well-known
TCC
Well-known
I know, right. Like so what if things are known prior. They won't do time anyway. Priceless.
TCC
Well-known
Never my intention. In fact I would depend upon this board not to be that. Amen. So that is why I would post an article with it "debunking" as it says. One way to consider if something might have merit beyond folklore and superstition is when they try and "explain" the error that does not exist. Which is what we have here. Remember 2020 electons and we saw votes unreasonable change in live time (as well as for I believe the later hot topic Senate races thereafter...it happened again). Those that hold to we are in the matrix themes see those as gliteches. I don't believe we are in a matrix and believe it is not glitches but just points of notice.
I don't believe COVID was a conspiracy theory. It kind of happened like all over the world. So to come out of that and feel like conspiracy theories are mere fodder for Alex Jones, is a bit unusual to me in some ways. Just saying.
I have no interest in conspiracy theories. But I do have an interest in tracking real evidence along the way of globalism trying to erode America. Some themes may be lame and bad judgement. Amen. But if we don't think America has been hijacked by gloabalsim and if we just dismiss that as potentially conspiracy theory, then lets just go with CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, etc. Because its not that bad. But the reality is it is that bad. We know our news sources are fully engaged in propaganda. By that I don't think we should be town cryers wringing our hands all over the place. Amen. I was just pointing out something that came across my desk. That does not mean anything more than...hmmm. Note to self. Not turning the forum into anything by it. When the media tries to excuse what did not happen...its just worth a "hmmm." Or an opporutnity for any forum member to offer some info the help understand it differently. Respectfully. Blessings.
Baby Yoda
Always Watching
Amethyst
† He hath shed his own blood for my soul
There is a lot of deception coming out on all this stuff.
"psyop" stories, AI photos, made up stories of athletes writing "heart tugging" letters to the Kirk family.
All of it to get clicks and pull at people's emotions. 90% is rubbish.
The internet has become weirder than ever. By people and companies that aren't even real.
"psyop" stories, AI photos, made up stories of athletes writing "heart tugging" letters to the Kirk family.
All of it to get clicks and pull at people's emotions. 90% is rubbish.
The internet has become weirder than ever. By people and companies that aren't even real.
No. Melanie King's channel is just the uninformed opinion of someone attempting to become a YouTube star. She's already approaching a million subscribers. Very few get there in that crowded social media universe by giving balanced, well-researched material. It used to be said that sensationalism sold newspapers. That goes double for YouTube. I have removed the link.
TCC
Well-known
Of which they would say "predicttive programming." Minority Report, i think. Just for the record, my take on preditive programming is that even though maybe like for example the Simpsons, often being quoted as predictive programming, is that i tend to think it is not the healthiest to see things that way. To the extent the Economist or the Simpsons etc might be thought to be used to unleash predictive programming upon a people, in a major way, for me, is kind of a non-issue. Because if something like that is going on, it is not going on in a vacuum. As God is sovereign, at best it would be mankind trying to seduce a society with it wiles, all the while under God's sovereign watch. One who can use their own devices against them if He wanted to. So its fun to consider.There's a movie like that.
If anything on the early postings of headlines what have we, even if so, it could just be stupid mistakes of global elites. On the Tim Pool show (which is pretty tame conservative), they noticed quite a bit of social media chatter the day before the shooting in the trangender communities. Something they are still unearthing. But it might appear on some fronts that something of this magnitude might have been known by a small group of people. To me, that would not seem like wild speculation. Our culture is demonstrating itself as that sick though, is it not? All the cheering and celebrating? If that is the iceburg above water, imagine the things said and the idea shared that never make it to social media. Just saying. And yeah just wanted to share that about predictive programming because i am not interested in conspiracy theory. But what i am interested in is how social artificats in culture work. That has always fascinated me. And would seem to be pretty big in the news today...ways in which social artificts are fabricated or imply quite a bit. I would just say something as big as Charlie Kirk influence--the chances of him being killed by a lone stranger vs. what level of tactics are known about the deep state already, I would say those chances are pretty slim. What we know about our day and age and how things are manipulated all over the place, would seem much more in reaonsable sync to go after a mammoth influencer like Charlie. Its like that kid that lives down the street always causing trouble. Sometimes maybe he did not do something. But Kirk has a line going out the door, around the corner, and half way into the next county of groups of interest to cause him harm. In a climate like that with midterms coming up and massive deep state loss of power...you guys...this isn't exactly rocket science in my humble estimation. Meaning this in love. Blessigns.
TCC
Well-known
Sorry pastor for any confusion this may cause. But the link that probably remains is the article i posted that pretty much tells you it probably happened before the date by implication though in its explanation. At least that is the way it reads to me. But i understand brother in removing the link. I don't know that channel. I would not necessarily say uniformed. As she was doing laymen research in an age where the experts are the enemy, right? lol.
My apologies. Don't mean to get conspiriacy spamy on the forum. I will consider more dilgently in the future. Thanks. And blessings.
LightOfMyLife
Well-known
I just found out that Erika Kirk (36) is 5 years older than Charlie was 31. He is born October 14, 1993 and hers is November 20, 1988.
Similar threads
