Canada prepares for potential US military invasion

The Canadian Armed Forces, comprising the army, the Royal Canadian Navy and the Royal Canadian Air Force, have formulated hypothetical scenarios of a US military invasion and possible Canadian responses. These include tactics similar to those used against American forces in Afghanistan, two senior government officials told The Globe and Mail on Tuesday.

According to the assessments, this marks the first time in about 100 years that Canada's military has modeled a US attack on the country. Canada is a founding member of NATO and a partner of the US in continental air defense. The officials, along with several experts who spoke to The Globe and Mail, stressed that it was unlikely the Trump administration would actually order an invasion of Canada.

The report also said that Canada is considering sending a small contingent of troops to Greenland to join eight European countries conducting military exercises as a show of solidarity with Denmark, which holds sovereignty over Greenland as an autonomous territory. Trump has repeatedly insisted that the territory should become part of the US. According to US reports, Trump has also repeatedly raised the claim that Canada would become the 51st state of the US. Over the weekend, NBC reported that Trump had again complained to advisers in recent weeks about Canada's vulnerability to US rivals in the Arctic region. Steve Bannon, Trump's former chief strategist who remains close to the president, said Canada was "changing rapidly" and becoming "hostile" toward the US.

Two officials told the Canadian newspaper that the military model simulated a US invasion from the south and anticipated that American forces would overrun Canada's key strategic positions on land and at sea within a week, and possibly within just two days. They said Canada does not have enough military personnel or sufficiently advanced equipment to fend off a conventional US assault. As a result, planners envisioned nonconventional warfare, with small groups of irregular fighters or armed civilians resorting to ambushes, sabotage, drone warfare and hit-and-run tactics.

A senior Defense Ministry official said Canada would have, at most, three months to prepare for a land and sea invasion. The earliest signals that invasion orders had been issued would likely come from US military warnings that Canada no longer shared a "common skies" policy with the US. A rupture in the joint defense agreement could lead Ottawa to seek assistance from Paris or London.

Report: Canada prepares for potential US military invasion

For the first time in a century, Canada’s armed forces have developed military scenarios simulating a US invasion of the country, according to senior

www.israelhayom.com

 

[TCC]

As a Canadian @Margery you are a very valued source. Are you saying that the WEF wants Canada to be owned by the USA?

 

[Margery]

As a Canadian @Margery you are a very valued source. Are you saying that the WEF wants Canada to be owned by the USA?

I think so. But my thinking on this is convoluted. Buckle up. It's going to get a bit weird.

It struck me early last spring when the WEF candidate Mark Carney went from zero to winning the election almost overnight and the non globalist candidate Pierre Poilievre went from almost 90% (shocking, unheard of for Canada) approval in the polls to a loss. Poilievre was for a strong independent Canada, and close ties with Trump's USA while Carney was for closer ties to the EU.

And the flip didn't happen because of voting irregularities. It happened when Trump was starting to demand that Canada be the 51st State, and Poilievre was seen as too much like Trump.

Carney's team positioned Carney as the Anti Trump candidate and Poilievre as a Trump puppet and wannabe.

Very cleverly done and very effective.

For anyone who suggests it was done by manipulating the vote results, it was NOT. This was everywhere I went. That attitude shift was overnight, and viral to say the least.

I can only attribute it to the enemy influencing people's minds and hearts- deception at work. The WEF wanted Carney, so there had to be a reason. I looked at the way Carney was positioning Canada away from the US towards the EU and military ties that were forming - looking like Rome 2.0. But too early- the EU isn't strong enough yet, and Trump was the wild card.

I also think the timing of some of Trump's announcements may have been a result of the WEF plants around him goading him a bit till he came out and said inflammatory things. Remember his own daughter Ivanka and her husband Kushner are trained by George Soros, and part of the Davos Young Leaders group that included Trudeau and Carney.

So we got the WEF candidate in Carney. Succeeding Trudeau. An unbroken line of WEF control.

And it's only recently looking at this whole Greenland/NATO mess the other day that I've figured out that the WEF or Davos incorporated WANTS a consolidated North American confederation.

I don't know why it took me this long to see it actually (patriotism got in the way maybe)

--because I've known that eventually the 10 kings stuff would be coming into view and one of the theories (I think in probabilities so I don't rule stuff in or out, I just rank by probability) was 10 regions. (I also think in patterns- when I see a pattern of behaviour emerging, and it repeats, I pay attention)

Which makes sense because it fits with their view of economics- they NEED a strong USA/North America to keep the technocrats happy until such time as they can push the world into a digital currency (which relies heavily on computer assets and ability that are concentrated in the USA). You look at global markets and New York is the centre for that, you look at high tech and innovation and again the USA comes up.

Is it necessary to have Canada and Greenland? Not really from a money or techno view, but in terms of long term vision (and the WEF/Davos/Klaus Schwab are very much long term oriented) then it's important for the protection of Europe long term to have a strong unified defence team over in North America to balance off the power centres that the WEF have been fostering over in Russia and China (the SCO group that includes Iran and Turkey or in other words the Gog Magog bunch).

Whether the WEF is aware or not, the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Org) looks like a match for Ezek 38 invasion group minus China. And the WEF seem to be focused on having power based in Europe eventually. Even as they manipulate the Eastern SCO coalition to make that happen.

Which means North America is important financially, militarily and technocracy for now as a buffer and protector for the EU as it emerges. And the SCO group (Russia, the stans, Turkey, Iran and China to name some) is useful as a threat to make sure America steps up AND EUROPE gets off it's collective backside and pulls itself together.

Hopefully this helps you see what I think I see. Still just one of my probability exercises. Might be dead wrong, but this is the way the pattern looks like in my head right now. As more information comes in, I would vary the outcome.

 

[TCC]

I think so. But my thinking on this is convoluted. Buckle up. It's going to get a bit weird.

It struck me early last spring when the WEF candidate Mark Carney went from zero to winning the election almost overnight and the non globalist candidate Pierre Poilievre went from almost 90% (shocking, unheard of for Canada) approval in the polls to a loss. Poilievre was for a strong independent Canada, and close ties with Trump's USA while Carney was for closer ties to the EU.

And the flip didn't happen because of voting irregularities. It happened when Trump was starting to demand that Canada be the 51st State, and Poilievre was seen as too much like Trump.

Carney's team positioned Carney as the Anti Trump candidate and Poilievre as a Trump puppet and wannabe.

Very cleverly done and very effective.

For anyone who suggests it was done by manipulating the vote results, it was NOT. This was everywhere I went. That attitude shift was overnight, and viral to say the least.

I can only attribute it to the enemy influencing people's minds and hearts- deception at work. The WEF wanted Carney, so there had to be a reason.

I also think the timing of some of Trump's announcements may have been a result of the WEF plants around him goading him a bit till he came out and said inflammatory things. Remember his own daughter Ivanka and her husband Kushner are trained by George Soros, and part of the Davos Young Leaders group that included Trudeau and Carney.

So we got the WEF candidate in Carney. Succeeding Trudeau. An unbroken line of WEF control.

And it's only recently looking at this whole Greenland/NATO mess the other day that I've figured out that the WEF or Davos incorporated WANTS a consolidated North American confederation.

I don't know why it took me this long to see it actually (patriotism got in the way maybe)

--because I've known that eventually the 10 kings stuff would be coming into view and one of the theories (I think in probabilities so I don't rule stuff in or out, I just rank by probability) was 10 regions. (I also think in patterns- when I see a pattern of behaviour emerging, and it repeats, I pay attention)

Which makes sense because it fits with their view of economics- they NEED a strong USA/North America to keep the technocrats happy until such time as they can push the world into a digital currency (which relies heavily on computer assets and ability that are concentrated in the USA). You look at global markets and New York is the centre for that, you look at high tech and innovation and again the USA comes up.

Is it necessary to have Canada and Greenland? Not really from a money or techno view, but in terms of long term vision (and the WEF/Davos/Klaus Schwab are very much long term oriented) then it's important for the protection of Europe long term to have a strong unified defence team over in North America to balance off the power centres that the WEF have been fostering over in Russia and China (the SCO group that includes Iran and Turkey or in other words the Gog Magog bunch).

Whether the WEF is aware or not, the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Org) looks like a a match for Ezek 38 invasion group minus China. And the WEF seem to be focused on having power based in Europe eventually. Even as they manipulate the Eastern SCO coalition to make that happen.

Which means North America is important financially, militarily and technocracy for now as a buffer and protector for the EU as it emerges. And the SCO group (Russia, the stans, Turkey, Iran and China to name some) is useful as a threat to make sure America steps up AND EUROPE gets off it's collective backside and pulls itself together.

Hopefully this helps you see what I think I see. Still just one of my probability exercises. Might be dead wrong, but this is the way the pattern looks like in my head right now. As more information comes in, I would vary the outcome.

Very much appreciate you laying all that out Margery. Thanks. On one level I am hesitant to track in ways you share. Not because they don't make sense. They do, for sure. It makes sense if one path of world control goes south for the WEF they will just regroup into another plan. And using North America to buy time does make a lot of sense. Amen. But what my general concern in theories of this nature is that on one hand we say and we know God is sovereign. But since we also know how evil things get, we kind of see evil empire thinking become surrogate sovereigns for purpose. And then filtering everything through an Illuminati filter as a great providential architect because God gave them leash. And we view end times through what the beast system seems to be doing. I am by no means saying you are doing that at all, dear sister. You actually make appealing sense.

But I just think there are dangers in looking at news and how things form and assign god like qualities of reality makers of evil entities. I mean to some extent for sure there will be overlap. But it can become a spiritual dungeons and Dragan's theater of the mind. Which in turn can in ways proffer undue homage to the Wizard of Oz kind of i guess is how i would say that. I don't mean to be derogative or to poo poo what you share. For in ways i have already taken some note to for sure consider its value. What i would say as one who is akin to patterns, if there ever is a persona we could place upon the beast system true formation, and heart, mind, and attitude like yours is one i would far more trust in making such composition. Because you're true to ear to ground sensitivity of what to even look for to actually look for anything meter is far more sound and rooted than most filters i have seen that look at end times through a beast system (or 10 kings or AC formation) mosaic. Even where i might not agree, I would consider how you are viewing things to have perhaps great merit in contrast to even my own surmising's. Amen.

So thanks for sharing your heart dear sister. Amen. In theory, my approach is perhaps sadly lacking in eschatological interest. There is probably something wrong with me in not having so much of that. I used to...lol. Meaning that I realize these days that my interest in end times is not so much about prophesy but like pulling up a front row seat to watch God work in a raw way before us. The stigma perhaps there is that most focus on eschatology is on how to see this country or this plot or this technology as it will fold into the beast system. For me, I almost have a zero interest in any of that. My sense is that perhaps an over focus on that sort of thing today (besides it just being amazing to consider where we are) is possibly one way we affirm God is true and real. Because to the extent we see evil unfolding plans, He told us, so we look for matches to affirm His word. I do not apply this to you dear sister. You seem to just have a natural inclination to discover. Which is awesome in itself. In some ways though i am not all that different to want to see God do His word today. But I don't really do it through the eschatological proper template.

To me it is more exiting to see God work. I'm not so much looking for Him to affirm Himself true in His word. I have a billion % certainty His word stands. So since that is true, i wonder off like a splash me in face with your freshly moved providence oh Lord. Almost like I'm a gypsy that found someone's lawn with the sprinklers running crazy and I bounce around from spray to spray trying to literally taste the rainbows. So to me, its more experiential i think than theological if that makes sense. It's like being able to hang out with God for a day He does some of the most amazing stuff going. And that right there is the best i can describe my filter. It looks for God 1000% to every 2% of dark prophecy like the beast system and the AC. Some may see that as kind of a pollyannish dreamer view of end times. But because these are His end to His age of grace, its just that its more exciting to see Him all over the place. Not so much how politics grooves into the tribulation as much. So i guess on that note, if there was anyone that i might be far more partial to in how they are looking at political movements into the tribulation staging area, I guess i found a forum where there is a soul like one such yourself in viewing, waying, discovering things as you do. Making the beast system formation ingredient of the end times a bit more attractive for me to consider. So I appreciate that.

. . . . .

So I said all that to kind of say when i am looking at these things that occur, in general i guess i am looking more at how God might use the USA to actually reroute the world direction for good for a minute. Because it would seem He might. In general this view in standard eschatology is foolish. Even anathema perhaps. I don't mind, if it might have some merit though. So I guess i mainly look for those things today in a Phil 4:8 manner or approach. At a time where it might be said, "Son, you picked the really wrong season to bring that into the house." I don't think so. But I do look forward to being helped along the way by such perspectives as yours. For they may have a lot more meat on the bone than we might realize today. Thanks for sharing. Blessings.

 

[Margery]

But I just think there are dangers in looking at news and how things form and assign god like qualities of reality makers of evil entities. I mean to some extent for sure there will be overlap. But it can become a spiritual dungeons and Dragon's theater of the mind.

100% agree

But stuck in time and space as we are, with the Bible as our 100% accurate view, there are ways each prophecy could play out. I don't think in absolutes- except for the Bible and God, but in probabilities. Those are like science theories which shift and change with data coming in all the time that changes the theory.

It allows me to appreciate views that I don't entirely agree with or disagree completely with.

I think that depending on when things work out the best we can do with these ideas is to see a number of possibilities depending on known factors and the timing of things. Because if the Rapture and the Trib are further out than we hope, then our short term view of how it "might" work is obviously not accurate.

Right now I think the whole prophecy/news speculation stuff is WAY overheated, way overstated.

I answered your question directly, giving you my exact thoughts at the present time, but that is subject to change as new information comes in. Which is why I'm allergic to seeing that Board of Peace business or the Abe Accords as fulfillment of prophecy, but rather as potential end time staging in prep for the end.

I prefer to watch, think, pray and wait on God to make it all work out the way He intends. As you do too. Meanwhile, any time you want I'll tell you what I'm thinking, and as always Your Mileage May Vary!

And thanks, it's always fun to bat ideas around with you.

 

[Spartan Sprinter]

I think pastor Adrian made an excellent point in relation to prophecies and how they play out on another thread.

i think only with a significant passing of time are we able to determine whether a prophecy has been fulfilled.

A lot of us can't help it amd simply out of excitement on most occassions are quick to pull the trigger and associate current world events with a prophecy that hasn't quite played out as the bible words it.

 

[TCC]

I think pastor Adrian made an excellent point in relation to prophecies and how they play out on another thread.

i think only with a significant passing of time are we able to determine whether a prophecy has been fulfilled.

A lot of us can't help it amd simply out of excitement on most occassions are quick to pull the trigger and associate current world events with a prophecy that hasn't quite played out as the bible words it.

I agree there is certainly huge amounts of that going on. As Margery said, we may be years away from what we think we see. The Abraham Accords may not be prophecy. And yes it is true that we get too excited and want to perhaps force things into what must align in our minds concern the word. I believe a complete horror show of that exists today. Because it is a good and necessary warning. Amen.

But all of that does not in the slightest keep me back from looking really deeply into how God might be working. Not because I want to be a prophet. But because it is obvious God is doing stuff. Whether it takes 10 days to do or 20 years, we are most certainly on its coattail. I may not know the exact portion of the coat I'm riding on, but there is a coat because there is Israel and the middle east taking a reshaping dramatically. Whatever that is worth, my enjoyment of however we want to place that in eschatology or not is something i believe far more profound. That we get to see God in some unique respects moving. That is worth more than all the right date and context guesses. Watching our Father move and groove in our day is kind of like God's way of integrating general revelation into a Disneyland E Ticket ride with Papa.

For example. Abraham Accords. It may not be prophecy. I tend to believe it is. But let us say no. Ok. So 20 years later something else happens etc. Fine. But what is happening is far too much around the Abraham Accords not to notice (Iran losing prominence, Iran the most Christian movement in the world, moving onto some next level Gaza motif, Trump brushing the WEF and UN out of his hair, globalism through Fink having to admit globalism has failed, etc.). These are too many arcs leaning in aggressive direction of God allowing things to breath into some form of eschatological theater (perhaps merely as Hors d'oeuvre). The fact that the Abraham Accords exist while Iran is turned into the Christian conversation capital of the world, and so many Muslims are coming to Christ over the past several years--to me does not make the Abraham Accords necessarily prophetic as much as an emblem that God is opening wide the door to the Muslim world to know Him. I see it as an emblem. A testimony of "His" greater work. While the rest of big Eva can see it dark. People are getting saved like electricity is in the air. It reminds me of too some degree Matt 11:12 and Luke 7:32 (in the sense that Big Eva has to have a voice and the things that are occurring may be instead the transcendent voice of children in the street like). Just saying...lol. To what degree or another in how this all might fit or not eschatologically is not really important as important to me. We are known by God (Gal 4:9). And that is enough. But it is also quite a bit too much...lol...when His knowing us takes us to Disneyland. I mean...come on...lol I'm in it because surf is up. lol Whoooaaa

 

[mattfivefour]

Right now I think the whole prophecy/news speculation stuff is WAY overheated, way overstated.

Thank you for saying that.

i think only with a significant passing of time are we able to determine whether a prophecy has been fulfilled.

A lot of us can't help it amd simply out of excitement on most occassions are quick to pull the trigger and associate current world events with a prophecy that hasn't quite played out as the bible words it.

You too, brother.

It is, of course, fascinating to see the signs of the Lord's return increasing in frequency and strength. Nothing wrong with that! But sometimes I think that people pursue what they see as prophetic fulfillments with such a zeal that it transcends everything else. It's almost as if they want to be able to say, "See? I told you that this was this or that was that. I knew I was right about this prophetic sign or that one. I knew this is exactly what would happen leading to the moment of His coming."

All I can say is that at the moment that Christ comes, the very last thing that any Christian will be doing is saying I told you so. At that moment there will be no more ego, no sense of self satisfaction, no patting oneself on the back, but just a sense of awe and great humility as we stand in the presence of our Savior and are joined to our God in perfect bodies, instantly becoming perfect beings.

So, by all means observe the signs of the times. By all means, become more and more excited as the day of Christ's return for His Church draws near. But keep the watching in the place it belongs: as an incentive to keep faithfully proclaiming the gospel and making disciples. Nothing is more important than that. As a pastor, I encourage you all to let THAT be your first love; not whether you can figure out the proper way in which end time prophecy will be fulfilled.

 

[Cheeky200386]

I get excited about prophecy because I want to be raptured so badly. If I see the system coming together, it means the rapture is that much closer.

I want to be raptured today!!