What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

Britain Will Protect Canada From... Us?

Excerpts from article:

Conservatives and everyone with an IQ incrementally higher than that of a ficus tree know that Donald Trump often engages in hyperbole as a negotiating tactic and sometimes just for the sport of it. That said, if one is a progressive, Democrat, liberal, or whatever term one uses in one's country of residence, a jape from President Trump is tantamount to one of the signs of the Apocalypse. Then again, these folx are so addicted to making every event in the world the subject of the next telenovela that they may actually believe it.

For allegedly being the world's cultural and intellectual betters, they wouldn't know a joke if it crawled up their legs and bit them on a part they were planning on having removed during transition surgery. To steal a line from the TV version of "Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy," these people are so unhip it's a wonder their butts don't fall off.

Speaking of jokes, things may be a little tense with Canada over tariffs at the moment, but everyone knows that the U.S. isn't going to make Canada the 51st state and that Justin Trudeau is still the Prime Minister until the election. Okay, there is a joke there, but I'll let you hash that out in the comments section.

That, however, did not stop a member of Trudeau's Liberal party from suggesting that her country strengthen ties with the U.K. Her rationale? The U.K. and NATO could use nukes — yes, nukes — to protect Canada from Donald Trump. Chrystia Freeland, Trudeau's former deputy prime minister and a candidate for her boss's former slot, feels that the threat of Trump annexing the Great White North is dire enough to merit potential military intervention from NATO and the United Kingdom.

Read Complete Article:

 
She's irrelevant now thankfully. Not sure Carney is any better but we are stuck with him now. I think he has a running chance of being elected if he continues on the Anti Trump sentiment up here right now. That is NOT good for the future. But Pierre Poilievre is losing momentum as the backlash continues.

It's not exactly warm and fuzzy up here right now- while America sees the 51 thing as a joke, it's considered to be Trump's long term goal with the tariffs. And Poilievre is seen as Trump's partner.

I don't see this as ending well.
 
Back
Top