I'm not saying the WEF needs a bad guy. I'm simply observing that Putin's ultranationalist stance may create conditions that suit the WEF's goals. For example, Putin's moves first in Crimea and then in Ukraine had --prior to the election if Donald Trump-- brought the world dangerously close to world war which would have played well into the globalists' agenda; and the subsequent near destruction of the Russian economy has created an economic scenario favorable to WEF's aims. Or would you disagree?
I think yeah we were coming close to world war 3 had there been no person in the wings that was not going to tow the globalist line. But because I guess we had the luxury of a loud Trump and a fairly cooperative deep state (somewhat conceeding they could not cheat), that blend afforded us to watch in the Summer to Fall 2024 I believe softened a lot of any real world war 3 threat. I'm not saying it was not there. I guess what I am saying is that the presence of a potential Trump victory significantly softened a world war 3 escalation. Almost like WW3 potential could not fully flex in light of Trump being on the scene in general.
This, to me, is similar to 2016 in ways. Although I don't believe the country saw a Trump victory coming then. It was a shock actually. And par for the course of kind of that he won because of the complacency of the left thinking Hillary had that one. That part is not similar. But what is, to me, is 2020 COVID. By that time Trump had been in office for 3 years and any sense of what it might have been by that point under Hillary (had she been elected) was not recognizeable. So we got to see how Trump handled COVID. But what we did not get to see was how Hillary might have. As bad as the vax was, it seemed to be by far the lesser of the two evils. A) Develop a real vax over the course of years while economies all over the world collapsed, or B) Feed the Big pharma greed to want a fast vax to open economies around the world.
I see that as a similarity to Trump somewhat averting WW3. But we don't hear much about my second paragraph concern because it is not something to easily measure. Yes, it was a lot easier to see a WW3 potential. But even there, that narrative could only emerge so far. Had there been no Trump in the wings, I believe the WW3 rhetoric would have been a lot louder in the Summer and Fall of 2024. And we'd likely be in the beginning thrawls of WW 3 now.
But yes Pastor I agree that just like in 2020 the desire would have been global economic shutdown to bring in the great WEF reset, as it would for ww3 to bring us to realign alliances -- which is another perfect state of chaos where the globalists would have insisted on a global reset as the solution. No doubt that is their aim looking for a season it can happen. However I guess I would believe that the WEF needs a bad guy though. Bad Climate, too powerful a USA, nations on their own are selfish, and Putin wants to rule the world. In that sense I would see Marxism in America to keep the focus off of what globalism is doing. Keep us fighting each other so we don't see what the globalists are doing behind the scenes I guess is how I would see it. The woke agenda, the DEI implementation, the Paris Accords all seem to be the children of globalism. Where it would seem to me they have to have a bad guy. Like an either/or fallacy it would seem. Blessings.