Everlasting Life
By grace, through faith in Jesus
......The delegates voted to delete mandatory penalties for conducting same-sex marriages and to remove their denomination's bans on considering LGBTQ candidates for ministry and on funding for gay-friendly ministries.
The 667-54 vote, coming during their legislative General Conference, removes some of the scaffolding around the United Methodist Church's longstanding bans on LGBTQ-affirming policies regarding ordination, marriage and funding.
Still to come later this week are votes on the core of the bans on LGBTQ clergy and same-sex marriage in church law and policy, which may draw more debate. However, the large majority achieved by Tuesday's votes indicate the tenor of the General Conference. The consensus was so overwhelming that these items were rolled into the legislative “consent calendar," normally reserved for non-controversial measures........
........With the absence of many conservative delegates, who had been in the solid majority in previous general conferences and had steadily reinforced such bans over the decades, progressive delegates are moving quickly to reverse such policies.
The article also states that this voting happened without a debate. And while that's puzzling, I do wonder about there being any sort of appointed Eldership in place to actually set biblical guard rails on important issues, rather than people voting?
Is that a better way to go with a church body? My impression when reading the New Testament is that this is how the Church put together leadership (after seeking the Lord in prayer).