What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

Trump to Ban ‘Large Institutional Investors’ from Buying Up U.S. Homes

Tall Timbers

Imperfect but forgiven
Staff member
President Donald Trump is moving to ban “large institutional investors” from buying up United States homes meant for Americans, a move that is likely to be welcomed with bipartisan support.

On Wednesday, Trump wrote in a Truth Social post that he would be taking action to prevent corporations from buying single-family American homes — a growing trend that researchers have said has been a drag for first-time homebuyers, neighborhoods, and quality of life.

Trump said Congress ought to codify the ban into law so that a new administration cannot open the door for investors to buy single-family homes in the future.

“For a very long time, buying and owning a home was considered the pinnacle of the American Dream. It was the reward for working hard, and doing the right thing,” Trump wrote in the post, “but now, because of the Record High Inflation caused by Joe Biden and the Democrats in Congress, that American Dream is increasingly out of reach for far too many people, especially younger Americans.”


This is something that will need to be codified into law. Where corporations have swallowed up a lot of single family homes, duplexes, etc., they should have to sell them. A corporation might have a limited need for a number of homes for some employees, so a law should allow for a few homes to be owned by corporations. There should probably also be a limit on how many apartment complexes a single company can own. Too many in one hand could lead to overly high rents.
 
This is something that will need to be codified into law. Where corporations have swallowed up a lot of single family homes, duplexes, etc., they should have to sell them. A corporation might have a limited need for a number of homes for some employees, so a law should allow for a few homes to be owned by corporations. There should probably also be a limit on how many apartment complexes a single company can own. Too many in one hand could lead to overly high rents.
💯
 
There are a few corporations/entities that own virtually ALL of the new construction apartments built in the last couple decades.
The rents are absolutely crazy here.


Rent for a 1BR in the new apartments built across from the Gateway plant are around $3000 a month (depending on floor plan/size), including association fee, recycling/green fee, etc. (incomplete disclosure on their website). Plus utilities. Allegedly all "sustainable" and "green" materials.

The apartments are smaller than mine, although they do have W/D or hookups in the units. Amenities are pretty comparable, although theirs are new the ones here are over 50 years old. The new apartments have far less closet space, half the windows, and are not designed as well for comfort. Why would I want to traipse from one end of the apartment to the other to get from the bedroom to the bathroom :doh: My complex is owned by a Christian family (their only apartments).


Nice area and very safe, but still . . . I can't help but believe those new apartments were built to take advantage of the Gateway employees (and intended to from the get-go).
 
There are a few corporations/entities that own virtually ALL of the new construction apartments built in the last couple decades.
The rents are absolutely crazy here.

They use algorithms to determine how much they can charge for rent in any given market. Fair pricing/profit isn't part of the consideration.

I saw this when my son was searching for an apartment in El Paso. Rental prices change constantly. If it wasn't for lease agreements, the rent would probably be different every month.
 
One of the companies that makes such algorithm software was sued and lost. Same software the property management group, which is also owned by the people, who own the apartment complex, uses :(

Since the whole complex is market rate, and no "program money" is accepted from anywhere, not a lot that can be done at this location.
Rent is high, but not as horrible as the newer complexes in the same general area.
 
There are a few corporations/entities that own virtually ALL of the new construction apartments built in the last couple decades.
The rents are absolutely crazy here.


Rent for a 1BR in the new apartments built across from the Gateway plant are around $3000 a month (depending on floor plan/size), including association fee, recycling/green fee, etc. (incomplete disclosure on their website). Plus utilities. Allegedly all "sustainable" and "green" materials.

The apartments are smaller than mine, although they do have W/D or hookups in the units. Amenities are pretty comparable, although theirs are new the ones here are over 50 years old. The new apartments have far less closet space, half the windows, and are not designed as well for comfort. Why would I want to traipse from one end of the apartment to the other to get from the bedroom to the bathroom :doh: My complex is owned by a Christian family (their only apartments).


Nice area and very safe, but still . . . I can't help but believe those new apartments were built to take advantage of the Gateway employees (and intended to from the get-go).
Here in NC it’s the same…..1,200/month at least and up for a 1 bedroom apartment
 
I can't even find a handicapped-accessible condo, townhouse, or apartment with handicapped-height counters, AT ANY PRICE
Let alone one that's a first-floor walk-out.
Or that has a roll-in shower.

Wider doorways and ramps aren't the only things that are needed by disabled people :tap:
 
Back
Top