Thanks for this Margery. We are processing quite a bit these days...lol.
Hmmm gift for understatement there TCC!
if Poilievre had not backed a trade war with Trump after his 51st state mention and mention of tariffs, then i think Trump might have wanted to work with him.
nope we were into it before the election was called. Trudeau's idiocy with the borders got Trump going before inauguration, and Trudeau made some stupid moves, then Canada and Mexico were blamed equally for the drug traffic into the US, with tariffs imposed immediately. Before the end of January or early Feb. April was when Trump launched his tariff the world program.
not example of imperialism as much as not wanting gangsters on your bordering country's porch
yup.
with regards to the globalist desire for war, yes that was a test run with Ukraine to try out a new version of war, and to get Europe primed and ready to field an army eventually as NATO fades. Now we are moving away from tanks and aircraft, and towards drones. Different style of warfare.
Not unlike WW1 where my grandfather fought, and had a rifle with a bayonet. I think he even had a sword that I vaguely recall hanging on the wall in the entry. Bayonets were because swords had been used in the wars before that. Something to skewer their opponents. But rifles, explosives, and early airplanes were the reality, not the bayonets or that sword. By the time of WW2 the shift occurred and wars were fought with bombs, grenades, tanks and aircraft. Even subs and ships changed.
Regards the globalist desire for war. As the Ferengi say on Deep Space Nine, War is good for business.
I've noticed something else. I don't think they want nuclear war. Not yet. But the threat of it is useful so there is a lot of prodding to engage Russia's ever present sense of paranoia - with Lavrov and lesser beings coming out with nuclear talks.
Greenland plus NORAD in Canada are the 2 best defences for Washington DC and the eastern seaboard of the US from incoming missiles from Russia nuclear or not.
It's ironic that the guy who is so big on reinforcing his own borders is so in favour of ignoring the borders of others.
But not unforeseen. And in that I see a vulnerability to being prodded by the WEF/Davos/Soros factions within his own family and trusted associates.
One thing that is a curious thing to me is why a man like Trump who would have to have some working knowledge of these things go to the WEF and call Greenland Iceland...lol. Jetlag?
He is prone to slips of the tongue. For whatever reason that might be. And it happens in multiple ways, so I don't think it's jetlag. I haven't studied that in him, but it might be interesting to see medically how long it's been going on, and whether his dad's descent into Alzheimers is an issue for him too. Not picking on Trump, because my favourite president of all time Ronald Reagan was apparently beginning to experience symptoms in his second term.
On the other hand he may not care enough about the differences, and want both Islands for use in his Arctic defence systems.
And perhaps a way for God to permit Trump some humility?
God did that to Nebuchadnezzar
The best i can come up with is that God is allowing the world to see Trump as just a man
I think this is the best explanation.
It certainly fits God's dealings with Israel- always pointing away from the human leaders towards Himself as Israel's saviour. And in the end it is always all about Israel. Anything happening in the USA that is prophetically significant is always going to revolve around Israel at the centre.