Trump team eyes preemptive strikes on Islamic Republic's nuclear sites - WSJ

Ahead of his January 20 inauguration, President-elect Donald Trump is evaluating the possibility of preemptive strikes on Iran to stop its growing nuclear program, according to a Friday morning Wall Street Journal report.

According to the WSJ, this move would mark a significant change from previously established US policy on diplomacy and sanctions when dealing with Tehran.

The report outlines the Trump team's evaluation of potential attacks on nuclear sites, indicating that members of the president-elect's transition team are exploring this option.

The same team is reportedly reviewing the aftermath of the fall of the Assad regime, determining the possibility of American forces in the region.

More

Trump team eyes preemptive strikes on Islamic Republic's nuclear sites - WSJ

The move would mark a significant change from previously established US policy on diplomacy and sanctions when dealing with Tehran.

m.jpost.com

 

[Tall Timbers]

Hopefully Israel will take care of it before 20 Jan 25.

 

[Margery]

Well now, we are finally headed in the right direction, maybe Israel will get 'er done or maybe it's a joint effort. That would take out a world class serious threat.

Maybe it would fulfill the Elam prophecies, wait and see on that. Even if it's just a good solid reset for Iran, it's high time.

 

[Spartan Sprinter]

Well now, we are finally headed in the right direction, maybe Israel will get 'er done or maybe it's a joint effort. That would take out a world class serious threat.

Maybe it would fulfill the Elam prophecies, wait and see on that. Even if it's just a good solid reset for Iran, it's high time.

Lol i said at the beginning of 2024 imagine how crazy this year would be, double ditto x 2 for 2025

 

[Tall Timbers]

Bibi and Donald recently spent some time together. They may be laying on some psychological warfare on the Iran leadership, getting them quite concerned since there's not a thing they can do to stop either Israel or the USA from hitting all of their nuclear related sites... and leadership.

 

[mattfivefour]

The Wall Street Journal is no friend of the Right. I would like to know where they're getting this information from. Or are they just trying to shake things up and stir up opposition to Trump before he ever makes a decision in order to limit his options? I'm just very suspicious.

 

[1LoverofGod]

The Wall Street Journal is no friend of the Right. I would like to know where they're getting this information from. Or are they just trying to shake things up and stir up opposition to Trump before he ever makes a decision in order to limit his options? I'm just very suspicious.

The story is in several news outlets but all of them quote WSJ report on it.
The Times of Israel points out that Trump had threatened to use military force against Iran and the end of his last term but it didn't happen. Also that he said he would support an Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear sites and he prefers another way to solve the conflict but if needed he wouldn't rule out military involvement.
It doesn't say that it's a done plan to have the US military get involved and strike the nuclear sites, but that if it comes to that he would do it.

Trump weighing options to stop Iran going nuclear, including preemptive strikes – report​

Incoming US administration said to be planning ‘maximum pressure 2.0’ campaign against Tehran, may threaten military action or even back Israeli attack — but still seeks to avoid war.

Trump weighing options to stop Iran going nuclear, including preemptive strikes – report

Incoming US administration said to be planning 'maximum pressure 2.0' campaign against Tehran, may threaten military action or even back Israeli attack — but still seeks to avoid war

www.timesofisrael.com

 

[Tall Timbers]

The Wall Street Journal is no friend of the Right. I would like to know where they're getting this information from. Or are they just trying to shake things up and stir up opposition to Trump before he ever makes a decision in order to limit his options? I'm just very suspicious.

There's been a lot of mis-information being put out about Trump and his appointees. The ability to correct those errors that are presented via lamestream media is via alternative media, so you've got two different audiences, so the brain dead who voted demonrat only hear the lies in most cases.

 

[Spartan Sprinter]

There's been a lot of mis-information being put out about Trump and his appointees. The ability to correct those errors that are presented via lamestream media is via alternative media, so you've got two different audiences, so the brain dead who voted demonrat only hear the lies in most cases.

Speaking of braindead, when are they gonna give the view the flick !!!

 

[Tall Timbers]

Speaking of braindead, when are they gonna give the view the flick !!!

Libertards need a show with which to commiserate...

 

[Spartan Sprinter]

Libertards need a show with which to commiserate...

LOL i only see it on podcast shorts from conservative commentators but it's a joy seeing Hosting read legal apology notes almost every show now

 

[Hol]

LOL i only see it on podcast shorts from conservative commentators but it's a joy seeing Hosting read legal apology notes almost every show now

I hate to say this, but that’s smart of them considering ABC news paying $15 mil to Trump for baby boy Stephanopolos’ accusatory big mouth