Trump focuses foreign policy plans on Canada, Panama, and Greenland

Greenland
Greenland, a territory of Denmark, has been eyed by Trump since his first term in the White House, during which he wanted to purchase it from Denmark, but Danish officials told him it was not for sale. The territory is rich in natural resources, including gold, silver, copper, and oil, and is a vital artery offering access to the Arctic.

“For purposes of National Security and Freedom throughout the World, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity. Ken will do a wonderful job in representing the interests of the United States,” Trump said.

Panama​

Another acquisition Trump teased over the weekend was the Panama Canal, which the U.S. gave control of to Panama under then-President Jimmy Carter. The U.S. constructed the canal in 1914 and maintained it until a treaty in 1977, which fully gave control to the Panamanians in 1999. The decision was criticized at the time by conservative politicians and has remained controversial in some circles.

Trump renewed interest in the discussion on Saturday with a post to Truth Social in which he called it a “VITAL National Asset for the United States” for the economy and national security.

Canada​

The Great White North is one of the U.S.’s closest allies, but Trump has joked about the country becoming the 51st state and mocked Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, calling him governor.

While the U.S. acquiring Canada appears to be more of a joke by Trump, he is concerned about the security of the U.S.-Canada border.
Complete Article

Trump focuses foreign policy plans on Canada, Panama, and Greenland - Washington Examiner

President-elect Donald Trump has already made headlines for his acquisition hopes and actions regarding Canada, Greenland, and the Panama Canal.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[1LoverofGod]

Trump isn't kidding about Canada becoming the 51st State.

I think the establishment of a North America region is on the table.
But, Trump has in mind More Security, from his comments on each one of these countries that he has interest in obtaining to belong to the US

Knowingly or unknowingly Trump is helping set up the Ten Region One World Government.

 

[Tall Timbers]

Trump isn't kidding about Canada becoming the 51st State.

I think the establishment of a North America region is on the table.
But, Trump has in mind More Security, from his comments on each one of these countries that he has interest in obtaining to belong to the US

Knowingly or unknowingly Trump is helping set up the Ten Region One World Government.

Yep! No matter who's at the helm in the various countries, the world is on a pre-determined timeline and it won't be a second early or a second late.

 

[1LoverofGod]

Yep! No matter who's at the helm in the various countries, the world is on a pre-determined timeline and it won't be a 2nd early or a 2nd late.

And I imagine that if this is where it's going, I think Trudeau will happily agree to merge because he is a groomed globalist graduate of the Klaus Schwab School for Young Global Leaders

 

[mattfivefour]

No, Trudeau like most Canadians hates the United States in terms of its power. Most Canadians are highly patriotic and relish their independence.

 

[1LoverofGod]

No, Trudeau like most Canadians hates the United States in terms of its power. Most Canadians are highly patriotic and relish their independence.

You have to look at the whole picture. Like I said
Trump is knowingly or unknowingly helping set up a North American Region.
While Trudeau hates America, he is a globalist and he knows America stands in the way of the OWG getting put into place. Even if Trudeau hates America or Trump, if the Ten Regions formation is done it helps the globalists with their plan.
If you read up on The Club of Rome, they came up with a map of Ten Regions for their One World Government.
The North American Region was one of them.
I wouldn't put anything past the globalists agenda to get put into place and if Trump helps along the way, knowing it or not, I think Trudeau won't put up a fight.

I think the patriotic Canadians don't like Trudeau anyway.

 

[1LoverofGod]

* A side note but related to my post*

“The Club of Rome’s mission is to act as a global catalyst of change that is free of any political, ideological or business interest. The Club of Rome contributes to the solution of what it calls the world problematique, the complex set of the most crucial problems- political, social, economic, technological, environmental, psychological and cultural- facing humanity. It does so taking a global, long term and interdisciplinary prospective aware of the increasing interdependence of nations and the globalization of problems that pose predicaments beyond the capacity of individual countries.”

On September 17, 1973, they released a Report called the “Regionalized and Adaptive Model of the Global World System” which was prepared by Directors Mihajlo Mesarovic and Eduard Pestel as part of the “Strategy for Survival Project”. This revealed the Club’s goal of dividing the world into ten political/economic regions… which would unite the entire world under a single form of government. These regions are: North America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Japan, Rest of Developed World, Latin America, Middle East, Rest of Africa, South and Southeast Asia, and China.

The Club of Rome Issues a Report Entitled “Regionalized and Adaptive Model of the Global World System” Dividing the World into 10 Kingdoms. – HISTORY HEIST

historyheist.com

 

[mattfivefour]

You have to look at the whole picture. Like I said
Trump is knowingly or unknowingly helping set up a North American Region.
While Trudeau hates America, he is a globalist and he knows America stands in the way of the OWG getting put into place. Even if Trudeau hates America or Trump, if the Ten Regions formation is done it helps the globalists with their plan.
If you read up on The Club of Rome, they came up with a map of Ten Regions for their One World Government.
The North American Region was one of them.
I wouldn't put anything past the globalists agenda to get put into place and if Trump helps along the way, knowing it or not, I think Trudeau won't put up a fight.

I think the patriotic Canadians don't like Trudeau anyway.

You're correct. Most Canadians do not like Trudeau. And Trudeau is not long for this political life. He will definitely be gone within a matter of a few months. So it really doesn't matter what Trudeau thinks or doesn't think. But since God shapes everything, I have no doubt at all that what Trump does will not only redound to God's glory and our good but also to the progression of society towards what will become the great tribulation and a one-world government.

 

[Ghoti Ichthus]

 

[Margery]

I think the patriotic Canadians don't like Trudeau anyway.

truer words were never spoke All sides except for the politicians supporting Singh and Trudeau are united, Trudeau MUST LEAVE. We really do prefer to be on our own and I think only 11% of us last poll support Trudeau as leader. (his mother being one).

As for WEF stuff he and Freeland worked hard to destroy Canada's independence and economy. I think that was just the first round from the WEF (same as the US dems). Create a problem (use the left, they are good at creating problems) and then SOLVE the problem (Use the backlash to the right wing- the people won't even see it coming). The Hegelian Dialectic has been a favourite tool by the globalists, the communists and every other destructive tool of the enemy. Create the problem on one side, then "solve" the problem using the other. All with the consent of the voters. It's working like clockwork up here.

Getting back to your OP so I don't rabbit trail too badly

I remember thinking about Trump's plans for Greenland that he took flak for early in his first term, and I was IMPRESSED! Greenland is ESSENTIAL for any sensible protection plan for the USA because of 2 Russian items: Submarines and Missiles. Greenland offers an early warning system for both. Trump really didn't spell it out, and everyone laughed their fool heads off at the audacity of "buying Greenland". I remember immediately seeing his point and writing about it back on another site at that time.

Their population is small (56,865 people) while it's owner Denmark has 5.9 million people. For context my small city in Canada- Kamloops BC is just under double the population of Greenland. (102,781 people including yours truly)

My point in mentioning that is that the Danish tax payer is less enthused about funding a huge continent/island covered with ice sheets with the equivalent of a few small villages on it. (now that I say that, I'm sure the American tax payer might not be that keen either- but the difference is the net cost benefit ratio.

The Americans gain an awful lot of security from Russian subs (who are KNOWN to be able and willing to cut undersea cables at will) and Russian missiles (also on subs but in the air too). It is a footprint on a place that gives control to the USA in the Arctic Circle, not just the North Atlantic.

If any missile was sent to Washington DC the shortest route, is a polar one and Greenland is the best warning possible.

Back to Canada a sec, we are having constant threats from Russian subs on our Arctic sea coast, (so is Alaska) and having the ability to monitor and control Russian subs and shipping in the Arctic Circle under American control could bypass the idiot factor in Ottawa (our Washington DC)

Now onto the Panama. China is a threat - and one of the things G and I found out in our very first cruise was just what China was doing in the ports around the world but also in the Panama Canal. Panama is a banana republic country. China and other bad actors have an easy time gaining influence and control. Shipping pinch points are super important for global commerce and trade, and the Panama is one of the big ones

 

[Margery]

To put Greenlands population numbers into an American perspective here are some American cities with around 50,000 people:

• Prescott Valley, Arizona: Population of 50,045 in 2023
• Everett, Massachusetts: Population of 50,318 in 2023
• Gallatin, Tennessee: Population of 50,355 in 2023
• Saratoga Springs, Utah: Population of 52,532 in 2023
• Bothell, Washington: Population of 50,213 in 2023

 

[1LoverofGod]

truer words were never spoke All sides except for the politicians supporting Singh and Trudeau are united, Trudeau MUST LEAVE. We really do prefer to be on our own and I think only 11% of us last poll support Trudeau as leader. (his mother being one).

As for WEF stuff he and Freeland worked hard to destroy Canada's independence and economy. I think that was just the first round from the WEF (same as the US dems). Create a problem (use the left, they are good at creating problems) and then SOLVE the problem (Use the backlash to the right wing- the people won't even see it coming). The Hegelian Dialectic has been a favourite tool by the globalists, the communists and every other destructive tool of the enemy. Create the problem on one side, then "solve" the problem using the other. All with the consent of the voters. It's working like clockwork up here.

Getting back to your OP so I don't rabbit trail too badly

I remember thinking about Trump's plans for Greenland that he took flak for early in his first term, and I was IMPRESSED! Greenland is ESSENTIAL for any sensible protection plan for the USA because of 2 Russian items: Submarines and Missiles. Greenland offers an early warning system for both. Trump really didn't spell it out, and everyone laughed their fool heads off at the audacity of "buying Greenland". I remember immediately seeing his point and writing about it back on another site at that time.

Their population is small (56,865 people) while it's owner Denmark has 5.9 billion people. For context my small city in Canada- Kamloops BC is just under double the population of Greenland. (102,781 people including yours truly)

My point in mentioning that is that the Danish tax payer is less enthused about funding a huge continent/island covered with ice sheets with the equivalent of a few small villages on it. (now that I say that, I'm sure the American tax payer might not be that keen either- but the difference is the net cost benefit ratio.

The Americans gain an awful lot of security from Russian subs (who are KNOWN to be able and willing to cut undersea cables at will) and Russian missiles (also on subs but in the air too). It is a footprint on a place that gives control to the USA in the Arctic Circle, not just the North Atlantic.

If any missile was sent to Washington DC the shortest route, is a polar one and Greenland is the best warning possible.

Back to Canada a sec, we are having constant threats from Russian subs on our Arctic sea coast, (so is Alaska) and having the ability to monitor and control Russian subs and shipping in the Arctic Circle under American control could bypass the idiot factor in Ottawa (our Washington DC)

Now onto the Panama. China is a threat - and one of the things G and I found out in our very first cruise was just what China was doing in the ports around the world but also in the Panama Canal. Panama is a banana republic country. China and other bad actors have an easy time gaining influence and control. Shipping pinch points are super important for global commerce and trade, and the Panama is one of the big ones

I do see the logic behind the why Trump would have interest in having a US footprint on those provinces, as highlighted as for Security reasons, but as to my analysis that I pointed out with regards to the formation of a North American region, while Trump may or may not be aware, this plan would fall right into the playbook of the globalists plan for a Ten Region World Government and that is prepping for the coming....

"fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, exceedingly strong. It had huge iron teeth; it was devouring, breaking in pieces, and trampling the residue with its feet. It was different from all the beasts that were before it, and it had ten horns."
Daniel 7:7

As I stated, Trump may knowingly or unknowingly be heading towards the set up for the OWG

It has to come to pass, to fulfill God's Prophecies and the Second Coming of Jesus to set up The Kingdom of God "on Earth as it is in Heaven".

 

[Margery]

...with regards to the formation of a North American region, while Trump may or may not be aware, this plan would fall right into the playbook of the globalists plan for a Ten Region World Government and that is prepping for the coming....

"fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, exceedingly strong. It had huge iron teeth; it was devouring, breaking in pieces, and trampling the residue with its feet. It was different from all the beasts that were before it, and it had ten horns."
Daniel 7:7

As I stated, Trump may knowingly or unknowingly be heading towards the set up for the OWG

It has to come to pass, to fulfill God's Prophecies and the Second Coming of Jesus to set up The Kingdom of God "on Earth as it is in Heaven".

This is something most people bypass when they want to fix what the left did. The concept that the right while better is still not perfect. And both play their parts in the flow of history towards the End. Especially towards the End.

It's right and good to want to fix it, and to try to fix it.

But some in the Christian conservative camp don't see that the "fix" sets up for the OWG in ways we can't predict. They want to see America great again and that desire isn't bad. But it doesn't account for the flow of history towards the End. Because God is the one who knows the future, and what He allows, will inevitably have End Times fulfillment.

Others are allergic to the fact that even the best of leaders will be moving towards End Times fulfillment. So because they spot a connection (Trump's son in law Kushner, or Elon Musk) to the OWG set up they automatically assume that we should not vote for someone like Trump who IS trying his best.

When limited choice is offered, you do the best you can with what you have. That is how I see Trump and Poilievre. Good men doing their best. Not perfect. Not preventing the End Times, not even delaying the End Times, just part of the flow of history. The conservative Christian voter acts as Salt and Light, as a preservative, but everything has a time limit in God's plan for human history.

Eventually God will deal with Satan for that 1000 years, and Jesus will rule and it will be Perfect, except for the fact that mortal unglorified humans will rebel at the end proving once again that no unglorified mortal human is perfect and that we need Jesus now and always.

 

[mattfivefour]

When limited choice is offered, you do the best you can with what you have. That is how I see Trump and Poilievre. Good men doing their best. Not perfect. Not preventing the End Times, not even delaying the End Times, just part of the flow of history. The conservative Christian voter acts as Salt and Light, as a preservative, but everything has a time limit in God's plan for human history.

Exactly, Marge! Our role it's not on the macro scale but the micro. The movement of world events toward the end time is not within our purview. But being salt and light is. In fact that is our job. Standing against sexual perversion, against the murder of babies in the womb, against the host of other immoral ideas that the world proposes and loves is our role. And this is where Christians get confused when it comes to elections, for example. They look at the macro scale instead of the one we should be concerned with: the day-to-day moral issues in our society for which we should stand as salt and light ... all within the context of an imperfect world populated with imperfect people. You have laid it out well, sister.

 

[1LoverofGod]

This is something most people bypass when they want to fix what the left did. The concept that the right while better is still not perfect. And both play their parts in the flow of history towards the End. Especially towards the End.

It's right and good to want to fix it, and to try to fix it.

But some in the Christian conservative camp don't see that the "fix" sets up for the OWG in ways we can't predict. They want to see America great again and that desire isn't bad. But it doesn't account for the flow of history towards the End. Because God is the one who knows the future, and what He allows, will inevitably have End Times fulfillment.

Others are allergic to the fact that even the best of leaders will be moving towards End Times fulfillment. So because they spot a connection (Trump's son in law Kushner, or Elon Musk) to the OWG set up they automatically assume that we should not vote for someone like Trump who IS trying his best.

When limited choice is offered, you do the best you can with what you have. That is how I see Trump and Poilievre. Good men doing their best. Not perfect. Not preventing the End Times, not even delaying the End Times, just part of the flow of history. The conservative Christian voter acts as Salt and Light, as a preservative, but everything has a time limit in God's plan for human history.

Eventually God will deal with Satan for that 1000 years, and Jesus will rule and it will be Perfect, except for the fact that mortal unglorified humans will rebel at the end proving once again that no unglorified mortal human is perfect and that we need Jesus now and always.

This is the way I have tried to see it that no matter what we anticipate or try to foresee by what comes from the things seen, nothing and no one can change what God has already determined as He knows the end from the beginning.
That's why I couldn't understand the divide that resulted within the Prophecy Community over the recent election because we aren't in control, with or without our votes. God is in control and it is God Who rises Kings and removes them.
If we felt it in our conscience to vote, that's what it was, a conscience thing.
Our decision in that wasn't going to have God judging us whether we did or didn't vote.
But as I have believed based on biblical history, God has used leaders for His purpose, and it would either bless a nation or curse a nation depending on God's purpose for raising up that leader.

I think God has His purpose for Trump being President again even against all the odds that were expected.

God may have him take this nation towards a prophetic outcome or God may use Trump for a short term pause to allow for the furthering of the gospel being shared as He is still waiting for more to be saved this side of the Tribulation.
Only God truly knows what His purpose is that this President was placed in his position again.