Ok, so like this is coming from the South End of the Peanut Gallery...but, yeah Amen. Remember in 2016? Remember the things Trump promised then? I did not pay all that much attention to it back then. I loved politics but I loved so many other things quite a bit more.
A MAN AT MY CHURCH
I heard about a man from my mega church back then that kind of seemed to have fallen out of circulation enamored and amazed by what Trump was saying in 2016. I knew this brother although having a very successful job and a great personality and a man adored in marriage...he did have some shortcomings emotionally it would seem. But I never figured it would translate in being obsessed with Trump's rhetoric in 2016. Where it seemed to almost trap this man in grave fascination with the them of Trump. This was before Q, or even any real sense that Trump would even beat Hiillary Clinton. So it did sound pretty bizarre to me back then.
THE MAN WHO FELL TO EARTH
It was not until around 2018 or so that I even noticed the Trump clips while he was running for president in 2016. As I had a chance to revisit them with a little more focus...yeah...no politician talked like that before. In our modern era, Reagan had elements of this with quite a bit more charm. But nothing so grandios as Trump was speaking like (and if we add to that a fast forward to 2024 on Truth Social--the things Trump said are almost raging lunacy if not true, valid, or real--extremely over the top language...constantly all year long). I don't think anyone should be whisked away by a political figure. I mean we know in the tribulation they will. But I just mean like it does not seem healthy. But after seeing what Trump was saying compared to every other president we knew...it was edgy, raw, real, even surreal back in his run for 45 days. And although I don't support the right to fawn over a political figure all that much...I understand what stopped this man at church in his tracks. Almost like being captured by a whirlpool of where WE really were on a timeline--what our historical moment really looked like (I was not really thinking end times whatsoever back then). It would appear, in rhetorically philosphical theater, Trump may have been the first landing of a sober moment permitting a world under the globlaists spell to peak behind the curtain and see...we were no longer in Kansas like we thought. That is when things began to change (2018) in what the things might for me and for us actually look like in real time (you know the rest of us not Trump on planet earth...lol...for his objectivity seemed to be quite different than all the rest of us). An odd awakening, for sure.
THE MOVIE TRAILER
I remember talking with several friends on Facebook about events and things going on in the years to follow 2016. I saw a conservative church or two, or many fawn over Trump. In contrast I saw Anthony Scaramucci make sense concerning the problems with Trump. So I sided with the Lincoln Project view culturally. But did like what Trump stood for. It takes either a very mature Chritistan or a hardcore narcissist to be brave or crazy enough to offer one's political life (like sticking aout our worn necktie into a meatgrinder) to swim upstream against the globalist machinery in our world. So I respected that. If globalism was real and encroaching deeply everywhere, we don't need a diplomat. We need a real life Clint Eastwood. And if he does not have the charm of personality equal to that, well that is ok. As long as he sees the pushback he would absolutely need to be about. And this was all told in the trailer to Trump 45 approaching in 2016. The writing was all there on the 2016 year wall. Interesting how perhaps we are so used to movie trailers, I don't think it affected many much. It did not me for about 1.5 years.
THE EMPEROR"S NEW WALL
But when we could see both severe Trump Durangement syndrome and Trump worship syndrome all happening at the same time, it was then I realized he was likely a lightening rod for cause. I believe there is a super octane reason why...all the attention (too much and too ugly combined). I found it odd why Trump 45 never lifted much a finger to build the wall prior to 2018. When they had the House. Yes it would have been difficult. But losing the House in 2018 would make it almost certainly impossible to get wall funding (from a group that wanted open borders anyway...and a country that was kind of glazed over to consider the false empathy of the left as somewhat intimidatingly real to a degree). I remember in all of that Ann Coulter (a huge Trump supporter --and the only person that actually saw a Trump presidency coming--and laughted out of the room when she made that prediction during the primaries). And yet, Ann abandoned him when she noticed how laxed he was about getting that wall. AND THEN going after the wall after you lose the House? lol. It seemed odd. I did revisit that period and discovered there was likely too much intimidation in the republican party during the first 2 years of 45's presidency. But still...why did Trump not even really try? Ann noticed that....and abandoned him for it. She smouched up to Romney. Taking her influence to the deep state. Nice lady trick. And I really liked Ann.
JUGHEAD INTUITION
But then something started to sink in. It kind of made sense why wait for the wall. I mean yeah sure, what would not make sense is waiting for the uphill battle that would have to be then -- likely too great against the Dems. But maybe losing the House gave republicans more permission to do after the midterms...in contrast (whereas before perhaps the country would have been as weak in resolve as the establishment republicans in office that were too weakkneed and owned during 2017 & 2018) to go against the deep state sentiment of open borders during the first two years of 45. And Generation Millensials & Z just kinda drank the cool aid all along the way--so they would not have been all that supportive and a Trump wall in 207-28. In all of this, it did seem somewhat to me that there might just to be "a" sort of significance it would seem from a Trump intuition toward just how far one could go with "the will of the people" -- and the building of the wall prior to the mid terms. Something we might not see to come too naturally from our perspective of the "stuck on self" Trump as we knew him to come to--that Trump not seem to be the most intuitive guy (the mascot of America--the billionaire Playboy...the know it all so many seemed to love...and the golden child envy of the great American dream).
THE MORE TRAVELED PATH
Sociopolitically it would make sense to wait and build a wall, if you had some working idea of the avalanche of opposotion in 2020 against you. I think Trump might have though. Seeing how they cheated in 2018...watching the counters live on TV change number patterns that made no logical sense. It would stand to reason (as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo seemed to have some idea of cheating--along with concerns of Governors in China's pocket). So the Trump team was aware of the level of push back coming in 2020. I don't exactly think they lost on purpose. Something like that is a dance I would imagine you just have to go with and just...see what is what along the way. I did get feedback from several sources outside the fringe views that Trump did have a choice to make. He would either go with Mike Flynne Attorney direction, Syndey Powell's -- challenge the vote through Federal system provided in the constitution leading even up to using the Military to recount (revote perhaps). We had not seen that before and that path would have been seen like we were a 3rd world dictator country. Something the left would have loved Trump to persue, I am sure. Or go with Rudi Gulianni (who was more of a "lets fight at the state and local levels upword--rumor had it he was semi retired, and wanted to travel the less untraveled path in is up in years age). It would seem that less untravelled path would be the more grass root approach to running locally with courts...hoping to make its way to the Supreme Courts too. Something more palleteble before the American people. But certainly having a much more uncertain outcome. We learned Trump's choice at the separation from Syndey Powell announcement and their local campaigns through the court system then kicked into gear with Rudy's path. Which was not a complete loss. But did not gain enough standing to keep Trump in office. A man pegged by the left as someone who would not leave. Fought to the end as he could. And left.
PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN AS PHILOSOPHY
So from there it would seem a Trump loss to not be a surprise to a team that knew the blind spots going in--in 2016 (our nation was shocked -- even more so the left -- of Trump winning then -- the left therefore never to let it happen again -- so how does a team on the right deal with that seeing the future landscape?). It would make sense that a team that could beat "the system" in 2016 -- the one Trump campaigned on as "rigged" could see contingencies in the future of how to do it again. Or, see the landscape too where maybe losing can work too. A team like that would seem to somewhat know (more or less) the 2020 campaign weather (especially from coming from the inside rather than the outside that time it would seem). So my guess (looking at how Trump is overly prepared now) is that Trump won in 2024 from how he kind of ran his bid for office since 2020...seeing Trump never stopped having rallies...seems to imply how to win in 2024 might have included a reasonably foreseen loss in 2020.
en.wikipedia.org
And announced his bid for 2024 candidacy in 2022.
THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD
If the old adage of not being able to disinfect a country controlled by Mafia players ( a bloated government, an infiltration from politics, education, entertainment, the courts...etc) that had significant influence over the America culture to much affect applies, it would not make sense one could do all that much if the whole town (if we mianturize this model) was owned by the Mafia. What would it matter if in that climate one won? The machine would erode one's significance anyway. So, in that way it would make sense to come at infiltration differently. Helping America to see its real dilemna. And in that I would say Biden was helpful. Because Biden had to replug in everything that Trump unplugged in 2017, quickly. Much easier to see and notice pubicially than the decades it took otherwise previously for the globalist mafia to massage a nation into its Mafia enduced like coma upon our our nation. And that shock value of our having to wake up to all of that, would be somewhat priceless. How this story ends is in God's hands. We shall see. But it would make sense for a right winged team to run along side a Biden regime that would (by laws of human nature) have to expose what they are about (Biden team unable to expose who they really were--now so visibly) from 2020 to 2024. And that seemed to be what we have been shown. A contrast of what America would not want to ultimately further become--and that in and of itself also be a strategy to wake the people out of slumber. And as hard to digest as it might be, to me, it would seem that completing the wall would not help the country come most effectively to see in plain sight what America had become--or became for us to see these last 4 years. It would have been a harder "reality TV show" to be affective -- something Trump was somewhat of a father of and successful way shower in...in his days prior to 45 (making hundreds of millions of dollars from introducing Reality TV to the world several years before). But if the reality TV component to the border wall be a helpful visual (one the left would constantly gass light anyway), we would not exactly get the best national conscience transformation without apocolyptic like (Arab Spring like) illegal border crossing to show on video on the daily. It takes time for ugly, to sync in. But without dramatic visual and amidst an exhaustingly consistent expert gass lighting from the left anywya, had the wall been built, do we think we would have seen as much? And the national conscience come so far or as far regarding...as we HAVE come to see...had a wall been in place at the time of 45's departure?
AN INDIRECT PATH -- IRREGULAR WARFARE PERHAPS
And these kinds of things kind of stand out when we see Trump goes back to Washington in 2025 with an almost superhuman intuitive political engine fully firing off on all 12-cylenders. It would make sense for this to be the bringing into focus a Trump intuition show, had he not first needed to see a lay of the land (2017-2020), a 30,000 foot view away from the political sphere (2020-2024), and a magically delicious Broadway production of what the left looks like when all eyes are very able to see them perform for four years (2020-2024) in contrast. All those elements combined seem to make sense how calibrated Trump is. Now that he is back. Not to mention of course the snowballing ease by which all crept up along the years between 2020 and 2024 by which would surely be numbers Trump could muster up and so hard then for the left to cheat -- because the public awareness had been primed for four years clearly seeing the open source folly of the left parading before us for those 4 years...it would be too big to rig a cheat by the left, against all that kind of backdrop--seemingly by some meager extent perhaps by design. And that momentum of Trump from 2021 to 2024 would likely not be reached had a team the not somewhat the inituition equal to the nature EXPOSED of exactly where America had fallen politically. But how does it look now? It looks like we indeed saw that...and voted clearly against all of that...all that we had seen. And in that sense the proof is kind of in that pudding I'd say--of not only winning...but being primed from what winning looks like when globalists styled Mafia tactics are very well understood as being seen...and equally rejected in November of 2024.
THE CLASS OF DECLASS
Factoring in as well the mergence of Rumble, Truth social and Twitter take over. In military terms, this would be the first order of military strategy. Take out the communications...first. I imagine something like that looks different when its the heart and soul of a country in free fall needing true restoration. But if it were to look like something...it might look like what we have seen over the course of the last 4 years (whereas Parlor was not able to weather that storm...contingencies alternative might have...and seem to have done so). In addition, we have Elon satilities. Again, communications. So, to me, all this interest with communications, stratetic intuitive maneuvers to some degree by political teams, the NXIVM (Keith Reiner) and Epstein collapse, the many declassified documents Trump issued the day he left in 2021, starting his 47 regime with declassifying King, JFK, and RFK (with RFK Jr. confirmation hearings -- Betting Odds--which are helpful gauges--show likely RFK to be confirmed), all seem to imply coming declassified documents to be soon made public. And if and when they do, it would make sense it be at a time where the Mafia may not be running nearly as much of the town as they had. And that would be the time (not before) to reveal the declass.
FINGER PAINTING?
So although it seems kind of like a Broadway production of Fun with Dick and Jane if it were a political movie...when we parce out how we got here, instead of it all being one big show...it would at least equally (and I would say likely a far greater chance of) that what is on the potential horizon are those details that can literally shake a Mafia down. While we have become acustomed to injustice reigning. And new leaders again merely only continue to perform as the same old story shadows we have become so accustomed to. And that cycle really never end. But just gets worse. And while we are use to two tier justice systems in place just being a permanent wave of the future. And while we might see in all that a grand wizard like production of grand deception...we just might instead be on the verge of disclosure unlike the world has never seen. And even though it might seem to belong to hype (which is totally understandable given what we have all been through together), if it were to actually result in true disclosure, it would be rather historically climactic like the world has never seen. And if that is the honest trajectory potential we are on, it would be one way the age of grace could end reasonably. God being sovereign. And more the key player in our age than the evil one more typically given center stage to ecause of a coming tribulation. But ending in disclosure would certainly put a But God motif on the closing of our age like nobodies business. And that does seem to be at least a plausible potential outcome given what we are currently presented with--with a Luke 12:2-3 ending signature to boot. That would make sense. Especially if that signature also personify "R E V E L A T I O N." Like, perhaps how to spell out the name of a book that is opening, through the theater of creation, if spelling the name of that book were written in the creative order...by the finger of God. Just a thought. Blessings.
but that’s an exception.)
