I only hope Trump has learned from his last administration to make sure his advisors are giving him good advice and not make irrational decisions.
The Operation Warp speed turned out to be a disaster.
@1LoverofGod -- I wanted to provide something in relation to your point here. I ask for forgiveness ahead because after looking at all I wrote, it is quite a bit further than anything remote to what you are saying here. But I did see this as maybe an opportunity to expand a little bit on some of the other features we had discussed earlier. These are basically just common themes I have noticed over the years and thought maybe this would be an ok place to share some of that if ok. In any event, I just wanted to clarify that I am not necessarily responding to what you mention here as if you were a non playing character in a video game (NPV) lol. For my thoughts go far beyond where your have succinctly stated well a concern...amen. I just see this as perhaps an interesting fork in the road moment to share some of this in relation. And in your demonstration of such good faith conversation, maybe this is ok to post in relation. But I just wanted to note that I do see this as going quite beyond your point. To the degree this might be on some level hopefully edifying...blessings...
. . . . .
This is actually a good place to struggle for clarity. As what I am writing here is not an easy thing to grasp. Up till now it does make sense. But its not like sweet sense...lol. One of the reasons I am not too high on Hagelian Dialectic is kind of three fold. 1) It's ability to short sell deeper considerations (and the flip side) / to build exotic narratives on viewing politics this way, and 2) Can easily groove away from Providence and where God might be acting (should His weigh-ins matter more than what men are doing). And 3) We've seen some of how Trump manuevers.
So like in the case with Warp Speed, it is understandable to see Trump rediculous on that front of course. But COVID seemed to be a coordinated venture to go that direction regardless who was in office. What is an interesting contrast that I believe has serious weight is it would have logically seemed that Hillary would have been president instead. What might COVID look like under her? What I recall early on was the trajectory of a vaccine would take several years (maybe even as much as 11). And if this was the timeframe, I'm not too convinced Hillary would have done Warp Speed. It's hard to say because she was never in office. But if depopulation is more of a darling of the left, it would seem a great strategy to keep the world shut down for years. That would not have only killed off far more people, but would have been super prime realistate setting for the Great reset. What might be ironic too to consider on this front is that perhaps the world has no idea how close it came to that reset. But God. And unfortunately perhaps under the clownship of Trump. Yeah. Go figure those two terms going together...lol...perhaps.
We might tend to view Warp Speed as the plan all along because of Big Pharma money. But from what I understand about the elite, is that if they have control over the central banking printing press mint (which America does), it could have taken money in any number of ways...as it has been for decades. It didn't need Warp Speed to run money. Because of the fact that keeping the world closed for years would have caused much more impact and the globalist desire to do a global reset, it would seem this was their plan more than Warp Speed. As bad as that program was. And as bad as that vax was, the sad commentary and irony on our day is it would appear to have been the lesser of two evils. Killing less people. And opening up the world (while throwing blood money into the shark infested globalist waters of Big Pharma as bait), prevented a global reset.
I know it might be difficult to imagine how much worse 2020+ could have been. But if they were able to literally shut down the world, would they not be bad at doing globalism if they missed such a grand stand opportunity to enter in the global reset? That was the perfect climate. Did the globalist not want a global reset? Is all providence that occurs at their whims? Or would having to deal with harsh weather realities that accompany taking over the world be something they were pros at in 2020? When was the last time globalism took over the world and learned from it? There was none. 2020 was the rough and tumble university of taking over the world. And they lost the ball in my estimation. Because it was totally game on to shut the world down. The only dynamic that could change that would be the vax.
Its hard to say how naive Trump can be. But his ongoing pushing the vax hints at him not really knowing how bad that looked. Perhaps Trump actually thought he was saving the world...lol. Maybe when its not about flattery...he tends to be a stronger business minded man. But with flattery, he becomes a little school girl asked to go to the prom? The strange angles I am shooting for is hopeful to demonstrate how we might or can leave room for God's Providence. Of course Catherine Austin-Fitts might be a plant telling the world what Mr. Global is about. But if her story is real, she has painted the picture that globalism is a world faction vying for power. It is not the wizard of oz. To the degree this is accurate, it would be good for the watcher world to consider I believe. And even if it is not. Even if Fitts is globalist puppet, globalists only have as much power as they do. With God still superintending Providence. As watchers we tend to merge the two together. Globalism conquering the world as God's Providence. But that may or may not be the case. Watchers are more prone to consider that globalism does operate as God's Providence because their take over seems to confirm for us biblical truth. And prophecy we can take heart in. But in hopes to humbly point something out that some watchers themselves have used, such as God does not need America to fufill Providence (something we would tout believing America fades...and a hopeful echo chamber watcher talking point to hopefully keep the church from placing too much clout in Trump)...I would submit: God does not need the NWO or the New NWO to bring about the tribulation. He's quite capable on His own to bring things to the level He sees fitting.
And unfortunately for those prone to equate having deep faith in prophecy as tied to a NWO of some sort with affirming that "yes" God IS fulfilling prophecy and we can tangibly track all of that in scripture now with Him, this coming year might prove to be that which weens the church off its leanings in this way more than from Trump. I'm not saying putting too much faith in Trump is better. But I would say they are equal though. And then I would just add, "And so what if God uses Trump and America to do Providence. Its in His hands however He wants to do it." For me, seeing America empowered and Trump rise in power is not a belwhether of super hope. Rather its a belwhether of something else. But I just would hope that because God might use America and Trump, that this might detour our sense of Go'd's Providence in all of that even as much as it might have been through a NWO of some kind. Is how I might view all that.
. . . . .
Having said all that
@1LoverofGod I concur with your concern. Seeing how Trump handled H1 B visa drama has me wondering how much of a globalist Trump might turn out to be. And hope he goes on a more sound true America 1st direction with it all. I guess we will see. But what is in view for me is not so much if Trump is enough of a nationalist to actually help America, but rather God seems to have in no uncertain terms selected Trump as useful to His providential end times aims. And whether we assign good and helpful or evil and Luciferian to that (I would imagine Trump being human might be perhaps a mix of both) is not so much my concern. I mean yeah it would be great if Trump were about true America 1st things. Amen. But even if he floats some swamp water himself, I'm not exactly looking at Trump to fix the world though. What I would tend more to look at is that God in no uncertain terms has made it clear He will be using Trump to some exetent. And in that kind of just do what I have been. Looking for His character in providence, moreso. Trump almost being an afterthought in that. And I imagine that after all the drama back and forth between how God would not use Trump, or that since American Christianity is idolatrous toward Trump, that whatever the church says about that is the better thing to listen to for clarity...is not exactly how I would view all that. Rather I would just see that yes there has been tendencies of Trump worship, and yes there can be desperate hopesters placing victory in Trump. But if that does not stop God from using Him to this end, to the degree the watcher church might find need to side line what God is actually literally using in Providence would not make me more interested in their view. Because I believe we can stare into the harsh weather of Providence and be ok. Because we are children of the light enough to see what the Father is doing...even if that doing is with Trump. Trump can certainly be a lightning rod for controversy. But because He rose, Trump does not need to be a stumbling block. Or a pair of glasses of how not to see Providence. God having the last word, Trumps Trump. And knowing this going in all the way is like taking candy from a baby. Although I don't exactly make a habit out of that, mind you. Blessings.
www.westernjournal.com
