What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

Trump Adds Insult to Injury After Trudeau Announces Resignation

President-elect Donald Trump renewed his push to make Canada part of the United States following Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s announcement Monday that he will be resigning.

“I intend to resign as party leader, as prime minister after the party selects its next leader through a robust, nationwide, competitive process,” Truedeau told reporters.

In a post on Truth Social following Trudeau’s announcement, Trump wrote, “Many people in Canada LOVE being the 51st State. The United States can no longer suffer the massive Trade Deficits and Subsidies that Canada needs to stay afloat. Justin Trudeau knew this, and resigned.”

“If Canada merged with the U.S., there would be no Tariffs, taxes would go way down, and they would be TOTALLY SECURE from the threat of the Russian and Chinese Ships that are constantly surrounding them. Together, what a great Nation it would be!!!” Trump added.

More

 
I tell ya, Trump is pushing for a North American region.
Knowingly or unknowingly, he's handing the globalists just what they want to form the Club of Rome vision of Ten Regions for a One World Government.

Just as Bible prophecy foretells of a Ten Horned Fourth Beast Kingdom.
Daniel 7:7
 
I tell ya, Trump is pushing for a North American region.
Knowingly or unknowingly, he's handing the globalists just what they want to form the Club of Rome vision of Ten Regions for a One World Government.

Just as Bible prophecy foretells of a Ten Horned Fourth Beast Kingdom.
Daniel 7:7
It really is remarkable. I wonder if the idea will get traction and actually come to pass in his term. A North American Union could go from Panama to Greenland maybe. Mexico and Greenland don't want in currently, but things have a way of changing.

Trump’s Annexation Proposal. Following statements made by US president-elect Donald Trump, who suggested that Mexico should be annexed to the United States, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum reaffirmed that “Mexico is a free, sovereign, and independent country, and we will always defend that.”

Trump stated that integrating Mexico and Canada as US states would be the most effective approach, citing the financial support provided to these countries under USMCA. He noted that Mexico receives US$300 billion in subsidies, while Canada receives US$100 billion. “We are subsidizing Mexico, Canada, and many other countries around the world. All I want is to quickly establish a fair and level playing field. We should not be subsidizing them. If we are going to do that, they should simply become a state,” Trump stated.
 
I think in the short term what is about to happen is Trudeau is about to do whatever he can to make the borders worse not better as a way to pay Trump back.

He's started by suspending Parliament today- it's called Proroguing it, but it's just suspension.

That means that whatever Trump wanted to improve the border security is temporarily about to get worse because when Trudeau suspended Parliament till the end of March (the 24th) no extra border money to improve border security will be available till Parliament is back in session and able to vote on it.

So mid April even if Trudeau lets the border people do their job then.

between now and then he is already using Trump to point out that Trump likes Poilievre (this means that he is trying to blame POILIEVRE for the situation) And regardless of what you hear in the media, the average Canadian doesn't want Trump or to be a part of America.

I wouldn't mind, but I'm a rare one. There are other conservatives like me, mostly in the west who would agree with me.

But even if 98% of Canada voted against Trudeau right now, that doesn't mean that even half of them want to become Americans.

So believe it or not, Trump was helping by forcing the issue but now Trudeau is using Trump as the boogeyman to scare Canada away from Poilievre and back into the Liberal fold

because he is using the fear of being absorbed by America.

It's a rough and bumpy road ahead.

Now would be a great time for the Rapture!
 
I think in the short term what is about to happen is Trudeau is about to do whatever he can to make the borders worse not better as a way to pay Trump back.

He's started by suspending Parliament today- it's called Proroguing it, but it's just suspension.

That means that whatever Trump wanted to improve the border security is temporarily about to get worse because when Trudeau suspended Parliament till the end of March (the 24th) no extra border money to improve border security will be available till Parliament is back in session and able to vote on it.

So mid April even if Trudeau lets the border people do their job then.

between now and then he is already using Trump to point out that Trump likes Poilievre (this means that he is trying to blame POILIEVRE for the situation) And regardless of what you hear in the media, the average Canadian doesn't want Trump or to be a part of America.

I wouldn't mind, but I'm a rare one. There are other conservatives like me, mostly in the west who would agree with me.

But even if 98% of Canada voted against Trudeau right now, that doesn't mean that even half of them want to become Americans.

So believe it or not, Trump was helping by forcing the issue but now Trudeau is using Trump as the boogeyman to scare Canada away from Poilievre and back into the Liberal fold

because he is using the fear of being absorbed by America.

It's a rough and bumpy road ahead.

Now would be a great time for the Rapture!
That's frustrating to hear. I really pray Canadians see through the tactic.
 
It really is remarkable. I wonder if the idea will get traction and actually come to pass in his term. A North American Union could go from Panama to Greenland maybe. Mexico and Greenland don't want in currently, but things have a way of changing.

Trump’s Annexation Proposal. Following statements made by US president-elect Donald Trump, who suggested that Mexico should be annexed to the United States, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum reaffirmed that “Mexico is a free, sovereign, and independent country, and we will always defend that.”

Trump stated that integrating Mexico and Canada as US states would be the most effective approach, citing the financial support provided to these countries under USMCA. He noted that Mexico receives US$300 billion in subsidies, while Canada receives US$100 billion. “We are subsidizing Mexico, Canada, and many other countries around the world. All I want is to quickly establish a fair and level playing field. We should not be subsidizing them. If we are going to do that, they should simply become a state,” Trump stated.
Make Greenland Great Again :)
 
I think in the short term what is about to happen is Trudeau is about to do whatever he can to make the borders worse not better as a way to pay Trump back.

He's started by suspending Parliament today- it's called Proroguing it, but it's just suspension.

That means that whatever Trump wanted to improve the border security is temporarily about to get worse because when Trudeau suspended Parliament till the end of March (the 24th) no extra border money to improve border security will be available till Parliament is back in session and able to vote on it.

So mid April even if Trudeau lets the border people do their job then.

between now and then he is already using Trump to point out that Trump likes Poilievre (this means that he is trying to blame POILIEVRE for the situation) And regardless of what you hear in the media, the average Canadian doesn't want Trump or to be a part of America.

I wouldn't mind, but I'm a rare one. There are other conservatives like me, mostly in the west who would agree with me.

But even if 98% of Canada voted against Trudeau right now, that doesn't mean that even half of them want to become Americans.

So believe it or not, Trump was helping by forcing the issue but now Trudeau is using Trump as the boogeyman to scare Canada away from Poilievre and back into the Liberal fold

because he is using the fear of being absorbed by America.

It's a rough and bumpy road ahead.

Now would be a great time for the Rapture!
Your country has certainly been through a lot. Amen. Canada is bigger than a state. You're basically 1/4 (like the USA) of America.
 
In fact, in terms of landmass, Canada is larger than the entire United States.
I'm wondering on that note @Margery if calling Canada a state by Trump is insulting to Canada? To me, in my eschatalogical view, I understand a move in that direction (being troll like as Trump tends to) fits the motif of globalist taunt. That out of the USA actually comes such verbiage...lol. Its kind of funny on one level because in ways of its absurdity. I mean the left have to be chuckling too thinking there goes jughead Trump again mouthing off...and then their Prime Minister (of super stubborn origin) finally takes a woke curtsy to the Wizard of the America Oz...on his way out. Its like "yes" we are in the matrix lol. Blessings.
 
I'm wondering on that note @Margery if calling Canada a state by Trump is insulting to Canada? To me, in my eschatalogical view, I understand a move in that direction (being troll like as Trump tends to) fits the motif of globalist taunt. That out of the USA actually comes such verbiage...lol. Its kind of funny on one level because in ways of its absurdity. I mean the left have to be chuckling too thinking there goes jughead Trump again mouthing off...and then their Prime Minister (of super stubborn origin) finally takes a woke curtsy to the Wizard of the America Oz...on his way out. Its like "yes" we are in the matrix lol. Blessings.
YES it does have a certain deep in the matrix flavour!!! :lol: A lot of Canadians realize Trump is trolling Trudeau and appreciate that aspect. Someone has to cut Trudeau down to size a bit. But on a deeper level this plays into a very big fear up here, that America will swallow us up and we will lose our national identity. That is important to Canadians from every political side. The longer the joke goes on, the more frightening it gets because people have been listening to the extremely leftist mainstream media up here so long that they truly believe Trump is a bad person out to take over the planet and force everyone to become Americans.

And I think Rose
I tell ya, Trump is pushing for a North American region.
Knowingly or unknowingly, he's handing the globalists just what they want to form the Club of Rome vision of Ten Regions for a One World Government.

Just as Bible prophecy foretells of a Ten Horned Fourth Beast Kingdom.
Daniel 7:7

has a point here.

Eventually Canada will have to give way and be folded into some type of global govt. It's what Trudeau's been working at all along. I just think it came as a horrible shock to Trudeau that maybe Trump and the Right wing might also have globalist ideas - not just Trudeau's backer George Soros and Klaus Schwab's WEF. Even if it's just a joke from Trump.

Most Canadians don't have a CLUE about globalism on the Left OR the Right, so there's a fair amount of shock and horror going on when the laughter is over.

Size of Canada.

We are bigger in land mass than America. As @mattfivefour said.

BUT we are 1/10 the number of people. So we are approximately the population of California, stretched from coast to coast, north to south.

Most of our people now live in cities, and most of our population is clustered just over the border from the States where it's relatively warm and easier to grow crops. The further north you go, the less you can grow.

Most of our southern city dwellers live in a socialist bubble. They rely on govt for everything while those of us who grew up in the North or in the more remote areas have much more of a sense of independence, and self reliance. City dwellers vote Left. The more rural or remote citizens vote Right. At least in the West. The East Coast is VERY leftist regardless of area.

We export beef, wheat, lumber, oil and minerals along with some manufacturing. So mining, oil, timber, cattle and wheat are the bulk of our exports.

Trump is wrong about subsidizing our exports. Where America does subsidize us, is defence. NATO for example - we don't pull our weight. The exports and imports are roughly equal.

So for a country that is 1/10 the population of the US we import 10x the amount that you import from us. We consume a lot of American goods and we are one of your biggest trading partners. You are our biggest market to export too but that is a much smaller slice of the pie for you. A trade war would hurt us far more than it hurts you.

One of the biggest things we export to America is oil. We are the biggest outside of Saudi Arabia for oil imports into the States. That is where things might get a little heated. Also wheat - we do produce a lot and the States buys a lot of it although we have other markets. Uranium and other rare earth minerals plus coal are sent south.
 
YES it does have a certain deep in the matrix flavour!!! :lol: A lot of Canadians realize Trump is trolling Trudeau and appreciate that aspect. Someone has to cut Trudeau down to size a bit. But on a deeper level this plays into a very big fear up here, that America will swallow us up and we will lose our national identity. That is important to Canadians from every political side. The longer the joke goes on, the more frightening it gets because people have been listening to the extremely leftist mainstream media up here so long that they truly believe Trump is a bad person out to take over the planet and force everyone to become Americans.

And I think Rose


has a point here.

Eventually Canada will have to give way and be folded into some type of global govt. It's what Trudeau's been working at all along. I just think it came as a horrible shock to Trudeau that maybe Trump and the Right wing might also have globalist ideas - not just Trudeau's backer George Soros and Klaus Schwab's WEF. Even if it's just a joke from Trump.

Most Canadians don't have a CLUE about globalism on the Left OR the Right, so there's a fair amount of shock and horror going on when the laughter is over.

Size of Canada.

We are bigger in land mass than America. As @mattfivefour said.

BUT we are 1/10 the number of people. So we are approximately the population of California, stretched from coast to coast, north to south.

Most of our people now live in cities, and most of our population is clustered just over the border from the States where it's relatively warm and easier to grow crops. The further north you go, the less you can grow.

Most of our southern city dwellers live in a socialist bubble. They rely on govt for everything while those of us who grew up in the North or in the more remote areas have much more of a sense of independence, and self reliance. City dwellers vote Left. The more rural or remote citizens vote Right. At least in the West. The East Coast is VERY leftist regardless of area.

We export beef, wheat, lumber, oil and minerals along with some manufacturing. So mining, oil, timber, cattle and wheat are the bulk of our exports.

Trump is wrong about subsidizing our exports. Where America does subsidize us, is defence. NATO for example - we don't pull our weight. The exports and imports are roughly equal.

So for a country that is 1/10 the population of the US we import 10x the amount that you import from us. We consume a lot of American goods and we are one of your biggest trading partners. You are our biggest market to export too but that is a much smaller slice of the pie for you. A trade war would hurt us far more than it hurts you.

One of the biggest things we export to America is oil. We are the biggest outside of Saudi Arabia for oil imports into the States. That is where things might get a little heated. Also wheat - we do produce a lot and the States buys a lot of it although we have other markets. Uranium and other rare earth minerals plus coal are sent south.
To the point of there being a globalist agenda even in the right wing of politics, take notice of what was said by the Republican Former President of the US


"Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective - a New World Order - can emerge... Now, we can see a New World Order coming into view. A world in which there is a very real prospect for a New World Order...A world where the United Nations, freed from a Cold War stalemate, is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders."

George H. W. Bush
George Bush (ed. 1990)

The globalists have infiltrated everything and will be found on both sides of the Isle.
 
Things that Trump is saying with regards to Mexico, Canada, Greenland, Panama, etc. may be psychological warfare with an endgame that only Trump and maybe close advisors know about. Cause the other side to panic and then cut the deal you really want...

I don't trust Musk and don't like his mouthing off on a lot of things, but there again it is possible that Trump is using him as an attack dog to pave the way to things that Trump wants to get done.

Just thinking out loud...
 
Things that Trump is saying with regards to Mexico, Canada, Greenland, Panama, etc. may be psychological warfare with an endgame that only Trump and maybe close advisors know about. Cause the other side to panic and then cut the deal you really want...

I don't trust Musk and don't like his mouthing off on a lot of things, but there again it is possible that Trump is using him as an attack dog to pave the way to things that Trump wants to get done.

Just thinking out loud...
I only hope Trump has learned from his last administration to make sure his advisors are giving him good advice and not make irrational decisions.
The Operation Warp speed turned out to be a disaster.
 
To the point of there being a globalist agenda even in the right wing of politics, take notice of what was said by the Republican Former President of the US


"Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective - a New World Order - can emerge... Now, we can see a New World Order coming into view. A world in which there is a very real prospect for a New World Order...A world where the United Nations, freed from a Cold War stalemate, is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders."

George H. W. Bush
George Bush (ed. 1990)

The globalists have infiltrated everything and will be found on both sides of the Isle.
This is true it is on both sides of the Isle. That shift in the republican party, best I can tell, dates back to the Linden B. Johnson era. Since the assissination of JFK, it would seem that both the left and the right have been guided by globlalism. Some fall more in line, some less. It might seem like a shock to an extent, but I would include Reagan with the UniParty. Although Reagan seemed to be less of globalist. Still the death of JFK seems to be where either side of the isle would be influenced by globalism.

So that would mean both Bush's were globalists. From what I have noticed, the realization of how intrenched the republican ticket is in globalism, has seemed to be slow coming. For me it wasn't until the vote was for Obama or Romney that I became aware that Bush W. was a globalist. As more people become aware of the right being a part of the UniParty, it becomes easier to see. And its good to see. Although the concept of RINO (Republican in name only) didn't show up in print until 1992, there seems to have been a concern of some republicans being too centrist for the party name dating back to the early 1900s.

One of the unfortunate aspects though about RINO discovery or UniParty clarity, from what I have seen, is the authority that seems to come with novelty. The reason I date UniParty back to Johnson is because of the JFK assissination being a marker where by all understood means we may have (a controversial issue), it is then the CIA would seem to have been a globalist weapon making itself clear how the presidency shall be ordered. So it looks like the UniParty (even in its more recent present composure) does go back quite a few decades. But as people wake up to notice this in recent years what tends to go with that perspective is more of a view that globalism is the zietguist of our age. Perhaps what comes with the culture shock of realizing the reality of the UniParty can be in ways overwhelming. What tends to typically occur with this contemporary awareness seems to be the tendency to see how deep the globlalist roots are. And the next logical sense is to then come to an understanding that globalism is such a leading faction in the world that it actually is THE zietguist.

What is good to notice over time (for generations who have been aware of the UniParty before our generation has) is that there are factions even though. Maybe the best example of this is Reagan getting shot. As an example not to stray too far outside the lines. I believe though what is more accurate than the right left paradigm (where when limiting our take on politics this way tends, I believe, to subscribe to a 1-demensional view of politics) is viewing the tensions as globalist or UniParty vs. Nationalism. I don't perceive though this has gotten all that much traction in notoriety. In that view it does, I believe, better "right size" the globalist reach (whereas limiting political views to only left/right tends to truncate politics into a less nuanced simplistic understanding that only globalism exists). Looking at a globalist/nationaist paradigm rather than a left/right paradigm tends to diffuse the tendency to limit understanding of politics as globalism only-ism. If we only look herat right/left and accept that as the veneer of politics, it is understandable how one is only left to look at globalism is all there is left laying in our laps. But I believe this is likely due to raising the line of site only as far above the frey so as to barely see above it. It would seem to present a logical fallacy of either/or of sorts. Like either there IS a real left and right OR there IS globalism. And that tends to be as far as that view can go. It would seem this can cut the political animal off at the knees though from what I have seen. Because it would seem that going from left/right to globalism is the full picture or all there is to see. Rather than the notice that there are nationalists and there are globalists. In the left/right either or paradigm there is almost no such thing as nationalism. Or that there is that running thread of active reality in the political landscape. And when viewing things this way, it tends to perhaps jam up a more comprehensive fluid political sphere apparent of genuine nationalism existing with power today.

For some coming to the realization of left vs right = globalism only, this culture shock tends to be dismissive of an actual nationalist movement as well in spite of globalism. Maybe a helpful metaphor of the rhino might be good here. Rhino's, the animal, don't have binocular vision. Thus the addage that if one stands between their two eyes, one is invisible to them. In metaphor, nationalism is what stands between the left the the right. But does not look like it is there likely because the sensational emperial glitz of globalism seems to damand the attention as if to suck all the oxegyn out of the room all only for her, globalism. But there are national trends worldwide. And there are national movements in the USA that are not part of the UniParty system. But to consider that seems to pale in comparison to the noisier more exotic appeal the threat of globalism poses. And in that state of perspective, when one considers nationalism from that POV, what that looks like is like, "You mean like Christian Nationalism?" Seeing nationalism only in a shoehorned negative context. Whereas, I would understand the reality is more like old school nationalism that still exists. Albeit not having much of a name for itself because of globalists trends worldwide. But I suppose the closest concept would be MAGA if trying to find a name. And although MAGA may have some incoherence to it (factions within such a big party), the unifier within MAGA seems to be nationalism.

. . . . .


@Margery brings up some excellent points about Trump and Canada. Organically I do believe Trump is a nationalist. But admittedly some times I do wonder...lol. But pound for pound it would pan out for me that he is a nationalist. With things like H1 B visas Trump does seem a little swampy on. But for now there are too many moving pieces on the board to know why. At least for me. His take toward Canada though I would not see as a move to Americanize Canada. That is just how I would understand Trumps perspectives. If there were a blend, it would likely be in the context whereas Canada remain intact in her national identity though. The jokes and trolling I would understand is Trump to globalism. Not Trump to the country Canada. This is how I see it though. I don't perceive the Trump agenda is to be a right wing globalists enterprise. Rather it would seem more like what it looks like when the USA fully flexes muscle. With an eye more on economic central banking infrastructures than taking over regions of the world with emperialistic ambition. I do believe Trump is serious about Canada being more in lock step with the USA (and Mexico too). However that pans out, at this point to see that as a right wing globalist front is understandable. Because we have not really seen an America that flexes. But he's not even president yet and there are worries of him being a right wing globalist. So the details will come out in the wash. But overall I would see it all as a Trump startegy against globalism in general. Blessings.
 
Back
Top