Thank you for responding, Marilyn. I appreciate your comments. But while I agree with most of what you said, I must respectfully disagree on two points.
Dan. 7: 27 refers to Israelis saints. The Body of Christ was never mentioned in the Old Testament as the Lord has NOT revealed it at that time.
True, but only to a degree. The church definitely is shadowed in the Old Testament. But the Israelites did not see that, for it was as yet sa mystery, as Paul says. But while as yet we were not a visible part of Israel in Daniel's time, in Christ we were already grafted in. And with God time is irrelevant (though definitely not to us.) Like many expositors, I cannot state that this statement in Daniel does include the NT saints. I believe it does.
The passage in 1Corinthians 2 that you quote simply says the "rulers of this age" (τῶν ἀρχόντων τοῦ αἰῶνος τούτου) did not understand the mystery. It does not say the mystery was not contained in God's Word: simply that they could not see it.
Rev. 20: 4 Those people are from the tribulation as they did not take the mark and were beheaded. (That is not us as we will be in the highest with the Lord).
Well, this one is interesting because much confusion comes from a careless reading of the verse. All three clauses are often interpreted together as referring to ONE GROUP of people-- those who are given to rule, being the ones who had been beheaded, the martyrs who did not bow to the Beast. Read the passage quickly: that's what it appears to say. But in the original Greek it does not read that way.
In the original it actuallyrefers to THREE GROUPS-- those given power to rule, those beheaded, and those who did not bow to the Beast. The repetitive use of the Greek conjunction καὶ demonstrate this. Καὶ is an additive conjunction. In other words it adds something to something that precedes it (Admittedly it can also be an additive particle that adds explanation to what came before it, but the grammar and context here in no way indicates that particular meaning in this verse.) No, the way it reads in Greek is that there are three groups referred to-- those who are seated on thrones and given authority to judge ... AND those who had been beheaded for their testimony ... AND those who had not worshiped the Best of its image or received its mark. All of these come to life and return with Christ for a thousand years. Honestly, there is nothing that says those on the thrones are the martyrs alone.
I believe part of the problem of interpretation comes with an erroneius understanding of vthe meaning of the First Resurrection. I careful reading of scripture shows that the First Resurrection is not a single one-time event. Based on an investigation of the makeup of the Church plus a comparison of verses such as 1 Corinthians 15:51-54; 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17, and our Revelation 20:3-4, it is clear that the first resurrection is for those who are faithful to Christ, from the dead in Christ to the living in Christ at the Rapture to those who get saved and remain faithful to Him through the Great Tribulation. They are all part of the First Resurrection, which is the resurrection to eternal life in union with God. The Second Resurrection (which comes after the millennial reign) is actually a resurrection to eternal life separated from God. It is also referred to as the Second Death.
So, my precious sister, based on the evidence I have described above, I am of the firm belief that those who rule and reign with Christ in the Millennial Kingdom will be ALL who are His at any point.
I, of course, being human and thus flawed and limited in understanding, could be wrong. And ultimately it doesn't matter: for we will ALL be with God for eternity. But based on the actual words of the original manuscript text I do not think I am wrong in this matter. But glory to God!!! What a wonderful future awaits us in any case! And it is ready to be revealed to us in due time, as Paul says. Maranatha, Lord Jesus!