TCC
Well-known
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett is the target of new ire from President Trump’s most fervent supporters after she bucked his position on a key case earlier this week.
Barrett joined — albeit only in part — a dissenting opinion penned by liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Monday. The case revolves around the highly controversial claim from the Trump administration that it is entitled to deport Venezuelan migrants under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.
. . . . .
Although this is just a guess, the irony I would place on best Hegelian Dialectic practice would more likely be found at the foot of what actually helps a country out from underneath globalist takeover, much more than it be about bringing in a new NWO or beast system for the tribulation. As stated before, i see the age of grace and the tribulation age function by very different criteria. I would suggest that although it is understandable to have age of grace links to the tribulation and its timing, to me, it would seem to be somewhat on the lazy side to make too many connections. I don't mean this in any mean spirited way. I am just referring to the ease by which we can link things without deep proof is often seemingly coming out of emotional convictions. Albeit well meant good faith convictions (for regardless of how much we might be off--warning against the coming 70th week in general is a healthy practice....amen), outside of where there actually are connections is where we might mistake the forest for the trees. And some very helpful domestic to our age attributes be buried in the process. Things that if seen could help perhaps much better puzzle piece solving a whole heck of a lot easier and far more straight forward for in which the age we current live, the age of grace.
My mere instincts have me believe that the evolution of globalist control over America (because of how things have taken shape over many decades) is likely a far greater domestic key in understand providence than to perhaps overlay Revelation or Matt 24 over the age of grace prior to the tribulation age. So like instead of seeing how politics play out according to a coming 70th week, i anchor events far more to the primordial stew we have evolved out from in our current age. Much like God has fashioned creation to have a child grow up, develops, and become a parent themselves. So i would liken that to accruements belonging to a similar age. Ours in particular...the age of grace. So the adult parent our age has grown to be would have all her long suffering history belonging to her that made her into the person she becomes as a parent. And in that state, we recognize her make-up. What she is made of. And how she parents. So, in like fashion, i would see the things belonging to our age, belong to our age...not the tribulation.
If there is any truth to that, I do believe in such a thing as Hegelian Dialectic. I do believe that is common tool used in politics. To the degree we may assign it a super alpha maturity in the NWO globalist paradigm I believe to be somewhat a gullible contract. Believing in the NWO as the wizard of Oz. Where they, like Outer Limits tv series controls everything we are watching. But rather, i would see that sovereign role belongs to the sovereign. And that would be God (Eph 1:21 -- Christ is over all principalities). Even so, there will be deceptions. There will be Hegelian Dialectic. But i would see it at a much less powerful level. Even more, I would see Hegelian Dialectic in the hands of the sovereign actually more so. That to me does not mean that evil plans in Hegelian Dialectic won't occur. But one way hopefully helpful to look at it is that even though things like predictive programming exist, those who use it are playing in an arena owned by a soverreign who can do whatever He wishes with those plans. And this article (although i could be mistaken) reminds me of one.
. . . . .
This is just an educated guess. Or perhaps an uneducated guess. But if we look at the bigger picture here we might be able to see some things make different sense. Now this could be totally off. But please consider that if we have become accustomed to and familiar with the games of the left, and we have, how might that look at some rather advanced thinking levels that would be even more familiar with it? So if the objective is to rescue America from globalism, the focus is not on the term of a president. Its outlook would be much wider. Its goal structure would be looking at an evolution of government more than what can be done in four years. It would be looking at what could be done in four years though as it pertains to a solid evolving beyond a four year presidency. And if that is at least part of what we are dealing with here, it would be helpful i believe to keep that in mind.
If true, it would make a lot of sense to consider how optics work in politics. Newspaper versions of stories have their effective place. So if we understand that governments obviously have to say certain things for Newpaper headlines that might be somewhat wildly different than other things going on behind the scenes (for actual national security -- like it used to be about...before governments just wanted a ruling class to own society by), then we could imagine how optics kind of work. In this case, one sure method the left would use against Trump is a rubber stamping SCOTUS. To the degree the deep state could raise enough reasonable doubt in society -- the Supreme Court is a fascist arm of MAGA (and we know they would do that...at least by now), it makes sense that Trump get enough wins without staunch support so as to remove lockstep rulings the dems will champion to arouse suspicion and hate.
Because of the above conditions I proffer that Amy Comey Barret is Hegelian Dialectic planned opposition. Not to deceive. But to lesson the ability for the left to use the Supreme Court rulings against a Trump agenda movement. This would make sense if the goal was to get to the midterms where gaining the full house and full senate would provide best context to actually progress America beyond the scope of 4 year elections that would reroute the country right back into globalism the second Trump leaves office. It would be theater. But to save a country. Not enslave it. So try that one on evangelicalism and see how laughed out of the room good faith in the age of grace would seem to make sense. For did we not get the memo of who is actually in charge of our age? They likely might say. Blessings.
