Doctors are wary of Kennedy's response to measles outbreak

[TCC]

Doctors are wary of Kennedy's response to the Texas measles outbreak

As cases in Texas keep rising, some say Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s latest statement is a 'wink and nod' to anti-vaccine groups.

www.nbcnews.com

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s hesitant response to the Texas measles outbreak — hinting that vaccination is important, but never fully embracing it — has left many experts wondering: Does the nation's top health official support vaccines or not?

Kennedy, the Health and Human Services Secretary, wrote in an editorial published by Fox News on Sunday, that the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine “is crucial to avoiding potentially deadly disease.”

. . . . .

If we hold to the Hagelian Dialectic view, we would see this and understand it is just same ol same ol. But what this might imply (because of the NIH confirmation hearing coming up) is perhaps a tandumn system run, change-over. For example, when we want to change from gold standard currency to oil-based currency, we needed to run a parallel economy for a while. So when the shift actually occurs, it won't be as jerky. Same with going from oil-based system to gold standard again. Get tariffs in place, bring back manufacturing, produce and sell energy, then move the system over. Otherwise, it is too jerky and could be devastating.

So what if RFK is doing is a similar track? We are in a day and age where when we see something like this it is always to bring us into further slavery. And although that has typically been true in spades, please keep in mind that the longer we hold to that view being same ol same ol today, the more we align with New Age thought. And since God transcends New Age thought, there might be more daylight than New Age concepts of us being trapped by government all the time. On that note, what if JFK is easing in as more pro-vaccine than we thought (seeing him as a sell out...same ol same ol), in order to not provide advantage to left to cry "conspiracy" and ever spiral in endless debate and get no-where. But if you nod and wink at it...while bringing online vitamins, hydorxichloriquen, and a new NIH Director that went against Fauci...what kind of push back could work against that? How would the deep state derail people in America gaining common sense so as to see the old system as antiquated science and logic? What if Fauci become "antiquated science" in public sight? Just a thought...

The Man Who Talked Back: Jay Bhattacharya On The Fight Against COVID Lockdowns

Prior to spring 2020, Jay Bhattacharya was a well-respected but little-known epidemiologist and Stanford Medical School professor. But when the COVID pandemic broke out that March, Dr. Bhattacharya was thrust into a leadership role as coauthor of the groundbreaking Santa Clara Study.

www.hoover.org

What Jay Bhattacharya, Trump's NIH pick, has said about Anthony Fauci

Bhattacharya has been a vocal critic of Fauci's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

www.newsweek.com

Blessings.

 

[1LoverofGod]

I wouldn't call it a Hagelian Dialectic. It's likely just what politicians are known for, to "flip flop" on certain stances depending on what will be readily accepted by the public at the time.
This happens on both sides of the isle often.
So long as "shots" are not forced on people, let them say what they want to say.
If people choose to get them, that's a personal choice.
I believe people have a right to make decisions on their health, and that goes for parents making decisions for their children's health as well when there's doubt about the benefits and possible adverse effects that can be damaging to one's health in the long run.

 

[janeelaine]

side note, a great resource for vaccines regarding christians is vaccinesandchristianity.org

 

[Tall Timbers]

Hagelian Dialectic view

I have no idea what the Hagelian Dialectic view is. I guess I missed that in school.

 

[Tall Timbers]

This is from NBC news. If one doctor made a negative comment about someone in this administration it'll become doctors and the spin will be destructive towards the administration. I would suggest discounting almost everything that is served by the mainstream media.

 

[1LoverofGod]

I have no idea what the Hagelian Dialectic view is. I guess I missed that in school.

Some phrase it as "two sides of the same coin".
In other words, when someone, or a political party will present a certain view, but in reality they are With the opposing side's view for the same outcome of an agenda.

 

[1LoverofGod]

I have no idea what the Hagelian Dialectic view is. I guess I missed that in school.

If you are familiar with JB Hixen, he has talked about the Heigelian Dialectic on some YouTube podcasts as a guest and on his own,
"Not By Works" prophecy podcast on YouTube.
Too deep for me
I prefer staying in scripture.

 

[1LoverofGod]

Some phrase it as "two sides of the same coin".
In other words, when someone, or a political party will present a certain view, but in reality they are With the opposing side's view for the same outcome of an agenda.

The background of this "technique" comes from Marxism. What the intent is to put something in the minds of people that sounds like it's for the good, but behind it is something that is bad, because it ends up hurting people.
It's about controlling people with deception.

 

[1LoverofGod]

I wouldn't call it a Hagelian Dialectic. It's likely just what politicians are known for, to "flip flop" on certain stances depending on what will be readily accepted by the public at the time.
This happens on both sides of the isle often.
So long as "shots" are not forced on people, let them say what they want to say.
If people choose to get them, that's a personal choice.
I believe people have a right to make decisions on their health, and that goes for parents making decisions for their children's health as well when there's doubt about the benefits and possible adverse effects that can be damaging to one's health in the long run.

Thank you RFK. Just as I said, that we should have the choice and not be forced.

RFK Jr. recommends measles vaccines for community immunity while supporting personal choice​

Amid the ongoing measles outbreak in Texas, Fox News' senior medical analyst Dr. Marc Siegel sat down with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in an exclusive interview to discuss contagion concerns.

"The new Health and Human Services secretary told me he is recommending vaccines for the purpose of community immunity," Siegel told Fox News’ Sandra Smith on "America Reports" following the Tuesday interview.

"He’s working with Texas health officials to provide many more doses of the shot in Texas."

At the same time, RFK Jr. continues to believe in personal choice, Siegel added

Complete Article

RFK Jr. recommends measles vaccines for community immunity while supporting personal choice

Amid the ongoing measles outbreak in Texas, Fox News' senior medical analyst Dr. Marc Siegel sat down with HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in an exclusive interview to discuss contagion concerns.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Tall Timbers]

If you are familiar with JB Hixen, he has talked about the Heigelian Dialectic on some YouTube podcasts as a guest and on his own,
"Not By Works" prophecy podcast on YouTube.
Too deep for me
I prefer staying in scripture.

I May not have ever yet listened to a podcast...

 

[TCC]

I wouldn't call it a Hagelian Dialectic. It's likely just what politicians are known for, to "flip flop" on certain stances depending on what will be readily accepted by the public at the time.
This happens on both sides of the isle often.
So long as "shots" are not forced on people, let them say what they want to say.
If people choose to get them, that's a personal choice.
I believe people have a right to make decisions on their health, and that goes for parents making decisions for their children's health as well when there's doubt about the benefits and possible adverse effects that can be damaging to one's health in the long run.

For sure it could be a flip flop. An0maly, a channel on youtube I frequent from time to time (i don't think he is a born again Christian but very sensible contrast to the insanity in politics), has already let RFK go as a real player. He was extremely excited when Bobby was appointed. But of course knew what the cost would be. I don't believe its an easy argument to suggest that beyond what the elected officials do, God might use it for tremendous good. I mean that kind of thing is popular if one belongs to NAR or the New Age, or the majority of reformed believers that are not dispensational (which is the larger %).

One interesting way to possibly look at this though is Rev 22:11. It would appear the time of His age approaching might be defined by evil increasing. And although of course we could argue that being righteous is not the same as being a moral and/or ethical republican. But from the standpoint of good and bad in a land, it just seems perhaps that Christ saying "let the evil be evil and the good be good," winks at the conditions occurring implying His season to come. Not that any are good in themselves. Just that perhaps a noteworthy time of His appearing be on the wings of an age where we could see the battle between good and evil unprecedented. And in terms of what we have noticed on a global level, that totally looks like our age. And i bet we haven't even seen the half of it. Blessings.

 

[TCC]

This is from NBC news. If one doctor made a negative comment about someone in this administration it'll become doctors and the spin will be destructive towards the administration. I would suggest discounting almost everything that is served by the mainstream media.

Understood. I'm with you Tall. I only have so much time to post here, and read, which i love. So sometimes i need to find an article on a subject matter. I always shoot for the more conservative vibe. Holistically it would be a more real rendering. But some of the stories i look for i find come out often quicker or sooner by the legacy media. So my approach to posting articles is not coming across an article and then i post it. I use some unconventional sources for compiling data and refining best current event perspective, attitude, and theme. Once i find a theme that goes well with how i am tracking in general, i just grab any article. Not willy nilly though. I try and find conservative first. If that does not work i look for the best headline that captures the social artifact i am looking for. But sometimes the substance of an issue i desire to highlight might have more meat (in reference to the theme i am implying) in underwhelming title or a seeing it through a left leaning bias.

The key feature for me is the story itself. Like in this case, NBCnews highlights the attitude of the left. Which means they don't like what RFK is doing. That's a story. And i kind of let the left tell on themselves. But the overall vibe including other articles is the notice that RFK is moving slowly into a alt-vaccine universe potentially. And that, on the eve of an anti-Fauci NIH Director. Putting those two together provides a potential context for a view more so of where things may be going...beyond how RFK may just look compromised. Seeing how the whole of the admin as a composite can help too inform us in likely leanings they will or may become to be about. If that makes sense? Blessings.

 

[TCC]

I May not have ever yet listened to a podcast...

You must have deep peace in your soul brother

 

[1LoverofGod]

I May not have ever yet listened to a podcast...

Oh, a podcast is just another term for a Livestream video. Certainly you have watched a YouTube video. Maybe not.