What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

THE HIDDEN DOCTRINE OF THE RAPTURE

Andy C

Well-known
Over time I’ve received several questions along the line of the following one. “Why do you think that such an important occurrence as the rapture is spoken of so few times and why is it so “hidden” in scripture?”

It’s true the rapture is not mentioned very often, at least not directly. In fact, the Greek word from which we get the whole rapture idea appears only 13 times in the New Testament and even then it comes to us in a roundabout way. The Greek word is harpazo and means to catch up or take by force. In most English translations of 1 Thes.4:17 it’s rendered “caught up.” The root from which it comes is haireo which means “to take for oneself.” 1 Thes. 4:17 is the only place the word harpazo refers to the rapture of the Church.

On top of that, rapture is an English word that comes from the Latin translation of harpazo which is why you can’t find it in your Bible. You would have to read 1 Thes. 4:17in Latin to see it there. (It appears as rapiemur.) Many people don’t realize that for the thousand years preceding the Reformation, the Latin Vulgate was the primary translation of the original Greek texts. It was the standard text longer than any other translation before or since.

Although the concept of the rapture appears throughout the Bible, it wasn’t until about 20 years after the cross that it was described in any detail. This is how Paul could say he was revealing a secret (Listen, I tell you a mystery) when he described it in 1 Cor. 15: 51-53. Together with 1 Thes. 4:15-17 it was the first clear teaching of the rapture in the history of mankind. Only with the benefit of Paul’s disclosure can you look back through the Bible and see the many hints of the rapture. (See Rapture References)

There was a good strategic reason to keep all this secret before the cross. Paul spoke of it in 1 Cor 2:7-8. Explaining that his message of wisdom was not taken from the wisdom of the world, he said,

No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began. None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.

Remember, Jesus called Satan the prince of this world (John 12:31, 14:30, 16:11). Paul thought of him as the god of this age (2 Cor. 4:4). And John said the whole world is under the control of the evil one (1 John 5:19). So Paul’s reference to rulers of this age is not to the High Priest in Jerusalem or Caesar in Rome. He was saying that had Satan and his lackeys understood the extent of the blessings God had in mind for the Church, they would have done everything possible to prevent the crucifixion.

 
Thanks Andy.

Yesterday I was listening to a Bible Q & A where Satan controlling people came up and how he filled Judas for the purpose of crucifying Jesus.

With that fresh in my mind it’s easier to realize that the OT did not reveal Christ’s blood would purchase His bride and that He alone deserved to be resurrected.
 
Sis, could you flesh this out for me a bit?
I’ll try. Honestly I wrestle a bit with this.

We know that Satan knows the Bible better than a human would be able to. Why did he miss God’s plan and fill Judas to crucify our Messiah?

I think there are many hints and in retrospect we clearly see God’s plan throughout the OT—the offering Abraham almost made of Issac, the blood over the door as the Children of Israel were rescued from Egypt, the Tabernacle then Temple, whole chapters like Psalms and Isaiah.

Because it’s something I love, that is Messiah in Hebrew Bible, I used to get my limited understanding that Satan knows the Bible mixed up with how obvious I’ve begun to learn that Jesus is foreshadowed in most of the OT.

When the preacher answered the Q & A about Satan filling Judas and the next day I read this article Andy posted, it made sense.

From the article:
“There was a good strategic reason to keep all this secret before the cross. Paul spoke of it in 1 Cor 2:7-8. Explaining that his message of wisdom was not taken from the wisdom of the world, he said,

No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began. None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.”

To me, it’s not only the rapture that was a mystery.
 
And, I now understand something that I used to get wrong about these verses from John 11:

47Then the chief priests and Pharisees convened the Sanhedrinf and said, “What are we to do? This man is performing many signs. 48. If we let Him go on like this, everyone will believe in Him, and then the Romans will come and take away both our place and our nation.”

49But one of them, named Caiaphas, who was high priest that year, said to them, “You know nothing at all! 50You do not realize that it is better for you that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish.”

51Caiaphas did not say this on his own. Instead, as high priest that year, he was prophesying that Jesus would die for the nation, 52and not only for the nation, but also for the scattered children of God, to gather them together into one.

Until the past few weeks I thought Caiaphas knew from studying the OT. Wrong!
 
We know that Satan knows the Bible better than a human would be able to. Why did he miss God’s plan and fill Judas to crucify our Messiah?

That's a common understanding that I've thought about.

The Body of Christ has an aid to understand the Word that satan does not have: the Holy Spirit.

So maybe, even though satan's brain is vastly superior to ours, he might not have a better comprehension of the Word of God.

That's just something I've wondered about.
 
I also wonder if you see the effects of pride in this. Could a being with excessive pride, lust for power, and desire for domination and to be worshipped really understand self-sacrifice for others? Maybe in a manipulative sense with humans as the sacrificees, but from the one true God who created everything and didn’t need to go through that, but freely chose to do so anyway? I think the enemy would have been self-blinded to all the prophecy and typology in the Old Testament. If so, then maybe God is glorified even more by that.
 
It's insanity. Pure unadulterated madness. There is no other way to think about it. Satan, who was created by God, must surely know how powerful God is, given his previous station, and in his pride, believes that he can defeat God? Jesus need only speak one word and he would be destroyed instantly.

I think we see on a grand scale how broken a creature can become because of sin. We see lesser examples in the pride movement (aptly named) where people who have rejected God's truth for the sexes, start to believe the impossible (that men can become women, vice versa, become animals...).

It's Romans 1. And, I believe we can now somewhat see the delusion of those who loved not the truth (2 Thessalonians 2:10-12)
 
Back
Top