Soros' alleged ties to Russiagate exposed in declassified annex of Durham report

[TCC]

Soros' alleged ties to Russiagate exposed in declassified annex of Durham report

The Senate Judiciary Committee released the declassified annex of former Special Counsel John Durham’s investigation, containing the underlying intelligence of the origins of the Trump–Russia probe.

www.foxnews.com

The credible foreign sources indicating the FBI and the Obama administration would play a role in spreading the salacious Trump–Russia narrative — before the bureau ever launched its probe — were allegedly tied to George Soros' Open Society Foundation, according to an explosive document declassified Thursday morning.

The appendix to former Special Counsel John Durham’s report released by the Senate Judiciary Committee sheds stunning light on what Chairman Chuck Grassley describes as "one of the biggest political scandals and cover-ups in American history."

CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi worked in coordination to declassify the information.

 

[Tall Timbers]

No surprises there, but it is good that we've got evidence. Now start the prosecutions.

 

[TCC]

No surprises there, but it is good that we've got evidence. Now start the prosecutions.

The one thing and theme that would be good to keep in mind in relation to arrests, is that if these high crimes and mistameanors are real at the levels we are taking into account, it would suggest high ranks and widespread infiltration. If so, and I believe so, it would likely mean that there are a lot of arenas in the country that could have built up mechanisms of harm to use in the event of exposure. One of those I believe would certainly be the border flood gates having been wide open for some many years. And the foot soldiers of the deep state to be the army of illegals brought in. Which to me makes sense that there is such force in use today to deal with immigration.

Yes to protect American jobs. Yes to end sanctuary cities. Yes to bring down crime. Yes to eleviate social drained social systems because of political use for illegals. Yes to restoring our borders just because that is kind of what countries do. But if illegal immigration in part was not only to re-populate voting districts to change outcomes, and not only to have bodies associated with fake social security voting posturing, but also to have a mass a people to use in revolt, should their system at high levels be discovered. So before there is too much pouncing and arresting and prosecution, I don't believe the country may be as aware of how much jeapordy we are in with blow back if we don't drain the deep state system finances and illegal immigaration manpower to use for harm and disruption.

In that sense I think it is wise to approach illegal alien issue first. Along with money draining. But as we go, there are likely other factors to secure prior to prosecution levels that will invite push back, public havoc, mayhem and harm. If that makes sense? Blessings.

 

[mattfivefour]

but also to have a mass a people to use in revolt, should their system at high levels be discovered. So before there is too much pouncing and arresting and prosecution, I don't believe the country may be as aware of how much jeapordy we are in with blow back if we don't drain the deep state system finances and illegal immigaration manpower to use for harm and disruption.

Yes!

 

[Margery]

The Western democracies/republics all rest on a single foundation.

The Judeo Christian world view. Based on 2 millennia of church tradition and the Judeo Christian Bible that tradition rests on. Democracies were a late comer but arose out of the rights of humanity as the Bible taught. The rights that God gave, not the State. Democracies were a final flowering of these ideas rooted in the Bible.

As different interests remove blocks out from underneath, the foundations get shaky. The 10 commandments, evolution rather than creation, the idea that a separation of church and state becomes a separation from all church stuff in the state- it's all under attack.

One of the systems that is supposed to keep things working is free and fair elections. It should technically rebalance things in favour of the voter, and the voter should vote their conscience. In a country with mostly born again people that works great.

BUT

This was a successful coup- to influence the election results. And it worked. Not in Trumps first term obviously, but at the end of his first term!!!

It doesn't matter that Russia wasn't actually involved at the level that was claimed by the left - that coup came from within, that it came from Trump's opposition, the Democrats. They did it, and succeeded because they could, and because they lost the idea of why elections are necessary and have to be fair. Institutions within the country that should have protected it failed as they were stacked by the same kind of people rigging the elections.

That made it worse. Because one of the 2 main parties in US politics decided that free and fair elections weren't necessary. They could just RULE. They fell apart a bit, and lost this last one, but people in both parties were taking notes.

When other countries or people inside those countries can rig elections, this becomes rule by force, a dictatorship that uses any and all means to stay in power. That's how banana republics get going.

This is happening more and more.

Power groups inside the country - AND OUTSIDE TOO are forcing the elections to go "their way". Russia did have ideas- they preferred Hilary! But by the Biden election, they weren't as involved.

In the end it won't matter what goes on inside the country, once elections can be rigged routinely, they will be. By both sides. At every election. And any country that sees an opportunity to interfere with a neighbouring country will!

We are heading for a time when elections won't even happen. 10 kings rise, then they give their authority to the Beast.

Nowhere in there is a free and fair election process. Nowhere in the prophetic picture does it suggest that the leaders/leader that arise care about their "voters", the people they rule. Or care about how the voters feel.

Elections are so last year! Out of style. It's a brave new world that awaits a supreme leader and he is the Antichrist.

Time is running out in the last grains of sand in the hourglass that marks the church age before the Rapture. Elections are being rigged. We are nearly out of here.

 

[mattfivefour]

Depressing. But I think that is indeed where this world is heading once the Church is gone.

 

[TCC]

@Margery and @mattfivefour Amen. I agree. But the picture painting here is I think important to qualify at this juncture. In brief, I would say lets us see 2020 as a mirror. If the things we are looking at find need to be going in a worse and worse direction, in general revelation of recent, we, I believe are being shown different, and likely for cause. What I believe happened in 2020 is that we averted the global reset. Meanwhile, since, it would seem all of evangelicalism is very fascinated with a global reset. And since we go into the tribulation, we feel to "must" look for it now. Regardless, it would seem it is a bit of a God moment just shouted from the rooftop to avert it. So it is that picture I would offer by contrast as a consideration.

I agree as Pastor says, "Once the church is gone." But the tendency is generally to see things go downhill until "BAM!!!" The ultimate end...the tribulation. But I believe God is showing us in general revelation that He is in the mood to intervene for the moment. And although we find it difficult to include that in our eschatology (especially when we see groups like NAR try and do that for us with mutation), God did not stop being Himself. And the owner of interpretation. Obviously He is not going to change His mind. But if He wants good for our age for a brief season, I think even though we cannot find that in scripture, it would be ok though to honor that that is what God is likely doing. If Trump is used to restore some measure of voter integrity on the way to the tribulation, it may not fit in a neat eschatological box. But I think we run the danger of possibly making a church understanding of eschatology too much of a live wire in contrast to what God might actually be doing kind of in front of all of our faces.

Margery and Pastor, I totally agree with you guys. In the trib yes. But we have precident of God showing us His desire to monkey with our views of eschatology potentially. Not to trip the church up. But maybe to remind us of His sovereignty over eschatology. I am just saying that in this sense that maybe good things do come for a minute and a half. And the next thought I don't think on that has to be, yeah but the devil comes and slaps everyone's face five minutes later. I just firmly believe we can honor what God is doing in general revelation in our close of the age of grace as "real good." It is often thought to be just a smoke screen for evil. Which makes sense if we are in the tribulation. But I don't think God is in as much of a hurry for that as the church might. Understandably because we are excited. I would just proffer that we consider His goodness and THE BUT GOD as potentially louder than and even more important that if we might get decieved. Because His character deserves that is kind of how I would look at it. Might that make sense though in part?