What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

Putin urged to use nuclear weapons as Russians furious at Ukraine 'Pearl Harbour' attack

Russian papers and military bloggers are discussing the prospect of Russia using nuclear weapons to strike Ukraine after Kyiv launched brutal strikes on Vladimir Putin's airbases.

Vladimir Osechkin, a renowned Kremlin critic with strong contacts inside Russia's security services, claimed the Russian President was on the war path.

Putin is reported to be holding meetings with the General Staff, FSB and FSO to determine which high ranking officers in the FSB's Counterintelligence will walk the plank for the spectacular failure.

Meanwhile, Sky News' Moscow reporter Ivor Bennett says some sections of the media are openely discussing whether Putin should retaliate with a nuclear strike on Ukraine.

Some argue that the country's updated nuclear doctrine allows for such a response because this was an attack on Russia's nuclear-capable bombers.

 
I would, after that devastating National loss. I would use them to completely eliminate Kiev. Then I would make an offer to the Ukranian Armies to unconditionally surrender and live under Kremlin rule or become part of a large glass parking lot. In my view, if a country feels a war is worth fighting, then countries should use everything they have to win the war. What's the point of having weapons if you're not willing to use them to defeat an enemy.
 

Related:​

By Leo Hohmann​


Former CIA analyst: '100 percent sure' CIA had some involvement in massive Ukrainian drone strike on Russian airfields


By now you’ve all heard something about Ukraine’s massive assault of killer drones that attacked Russian airfields housing Russia’s nuclear bomber fleet in Siberia and several other locations deep within the country’s heartland.

The mainstream narrative is that the operation took upwards of 18 months to plan and execute and was “personally overseen” by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Sorry, folks, but I don’t buy it. This attack was not something a guy like Zelensky, whose skill set includes being a former homo-erotic dancer and actor, was prepared for.

The attack, according to mainstream reports, took out 41 aircraft or roughly 34 percent of Russia’s fleet of strategic bombers.

Yet, other knowledgeable sources, such as former British diplomat Alastair Crook, estimate the number of lost Russian bombers at closer to 7, or roughly 5 percent of the country’s overall fleet. The Western media is always going to take information from Kiev at face value, rather than question it or compare it to what the Russian media is reporting.

Anyway, it’s fair to say that whether it was 5 percent, 10 percent or 34 percent, what happened on Sunday in Russia was a major propaganda victory for Ukraine and an embarrassing intelligence lapse for Russia.


Will it change the trajectory of the war between Russia and Ukraine? Absolutely not. And that trajectory has been going in Russia’s favor for months.

But one big unanswered question is how much, if anything, was known about this attack in the bowls of the Washington deep state in Washington, D.C.

Did the president himself know about it? The official line is that he did not.

However, that doesn’t mean the U.S. government wasn’t involved.

As former CIA analyst Larry Johnson said Monday in an interview with Judge Andrew Napolitano, the U.S. government would likely strive to give the president plausible deniability for an operation like this, which took place some 2,700 miles inside Russia and away from the frontlines of the ongoing war.

In a NATO proxy war against Russia, with Ukraine serving as the proxy, somebody in Washington and/or London had to of been involved in an operation as sophisticated and strategic as the one that went down in Russia on Sunday, Johnson said.

“I guarantee you,” he said. “At least one, if not more officers, within the Central Intelligence Agency knew about this and may have even been involved with the planning for it and the operation of it.”

When pressed by Napolitano on how confident he was that CIA, MI6 or perhaps the Israeli Mousad would have been involved in an operation of this scale, Johnson responded:

“100 percent. Just the operations of initiating, of turning the drones on. Think of the process. You’ve got them hidden under this roof, so the roof has to open up. That requires an external command. The reports are they were using the Russian phone network. Maybe? But I think Starlink, Elon Musk’s operation, was involved with this as well. You can’t rule out satellite communications as a source of overhead imagery. Hey, it was reported, and I see no confirmation of it, that (U.S. Defense Secretary) Pete Hegseth was watching the attack in real time. Which means (if true), he absolutely knew it was coming on.”
Fast-forward to the 5-minute mark to watch the key parts of the interview with Larry Johnson in the video below.

If Johnson, a street-wise veteran former CIA analyst, is saying that he’s 100 percent sure that someone in the CIA was aware of this attack and may have been involved in helping to pull it off, what does that tell you about the U.S. government and who is really in charge of it? It’s not the president, folks. He’s just along for the ride.

And if the president did know about it, then he has just lost all credibility in his purported role as peacemaker between Russia and Ukraine. The Kremlin’s gloves are going to come off, either as a result of this escalation or the next one, but they’re going to come off and we are going to World War III with Russia, which means we will also at some point be fighting China, Iran and North Korea.

Pray for peace. Prepare for war. Because with each passing day we are getting closer. Why? Because the globalist Luciferians who run the puppet politicians want it. They want it because they feel they need it in order to complete the Great Reset and transition into an all-digital, all-knowing, global surveillance state and end-times beast system powered by artificial intelligence.

"Share"

 
I would, after that devastating National loss. I would use them to completely eliminate Kiev. Then I would make an offer to the Ukranian Armies to unconditionally surrender and live under Kremlin rule or become part of a large glass parking lot. In my view, if a country feels a war is worth fighting, then countries should use everything they have to win the war. What's the point of having weapons if you're not willing to use them to defeat an enemy.

Generally, yes, but unless neutron nuke(s), there would be loss of human life well beyond what is necessary, especially when one considers radioactive fallout dispersion, which would travel far, far beyond the target, harming uninvolved people and countries.

I think every nuclear power needs to think about this before even considering the use of nuke(s). Even if "only limited."
With great weapons/power comes great responsibility.

When Chernobyl happened, some of the radioactive isotopes ended up in the United States.
There was a public health notice about a small amount of Chernobyl-related radioactive isotopes in milk, and a suggestion to limit milk consumption, at the time. I bet most people ignored it, or reverted to normal consumption pretty quickly.

FWIW, some of Gog/USSR nuclear weapons went missing when USSR "broke up." There's the potential that Ukraine has one or more. If so, if Gog/USSR uses nuke(s), it's very likely Ukraine would retaliate in kind.
 
I would, after that devastating National loss. I would use them to completely eliminate Kiev. Then I would make an offer to the Ukranian Armies to unconditionally surrender and live under Kremlin rule or become part of a large glass parking lot. In my view, if a country feels a war is worth fighting, then countries should use everything they have to win the war. What's the point of having weapons if you're not willing to use them to defeat an enemy.
No country has used a nuke since the bombs dropped that ended WWII. Why won’t Putin likely use his? He does not know what retaliation that could trigger from other countries, or even from hidden assets Ukraine may still have.
 
Back
Top