What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

Possible Red Heifer Sacrifice

It sounds like the Jewish guy is really not referencing Jesus as being here in every generation/re-incarnation..............
but, is referencing satan and his anti-christ. He's really misleading the masses and preparing the way for the evil one in the trib.
Such delusion.........
 
From the article: On July 1, Stinson, in coordination with the Temple Institute, arranged for what was said to be a practice with a disqualified red heifer.
“The ceremony went perfect. With a perfect priest. In a place outside of the camp. And, in the opinion of those I respect, we used a perfect red heifer.”
The accounts from Stinson and King are enough to get us interested. But why would The Temple Institute, the most credible authority on the topic, claim it was not the actual ceremony if everything was legitimate and by the book?


I am a little confused. It was a practice ritual with a "disqualified red heifer", then said "a perfect red heifer". So was it a real sacrifice described as a practice ritual to fool the opponents?
 
I was expecting the burning altar(?) to look more…ceremonial? It sure looked rustic. Guess they didn’t want it fancy so it would not draw any attention to the area at all.
The big creepy looking thing with the long ramp that they built last year must have been a diversion or will be used for something else.
We know that Satan :diablo:, the ac, and fp I don't mean air conditioning or fireplace, but they are going to the lake of fire.
 
From the article: On July 1, Stinson, in coordination with the Temple Institute, arranged for what was said to be a practice with a disqualified red heifer.
“The ceremony went perfect. With a perfect priest. In a place outside of the camp. And, in the opinion of those I respect, we used a perfect red heifer.”
The accounts from Stinson and King are enough to get us interested. But why would The Temple Institute, the most credible authority on the topic, claim it was not the actual ceremony if everything was legitimate and by the book?


I am a little confused. It was a practice ritual with a "disqualified red heifer", then said "a perfect red heifer". So was it a real sacrifice described as a practice ritual to fool the opponents?

Doesn't the red heifer have to be sacrificed by a certain age? If so, if too old, it could have been perfect, but disqualified.
 
Even if it was a perfect heifer, perfectly done they will keep that news obscured by a fog of uncertainty.

If it was a practice, they are well within their rights to do so, and by announcing it as a practice run, they prevent the local muslims from going nuts and slaughtering Jewish neighbours.

I don't think we can know either way with certainty.

It's like the rapture- God knows the date, Satan can guess, but Satan doesn't know for sure and that is a good thing.

Maybe they break ground before the Rapture, maybe not.

They might not do another heifer till they are nearly done the building- we don't know.

It is one more sign though that we are getting close to the Rapture. When we start to see stuff that belongs in the Tribulation being set up.
 
Back
Top