Pam Bondi's DOJ Is Sabotaging The Trump Coalition

[Hol]

In November 2024, the American people decisively elected President Trump to a second term in office. After four intolerable years of controlled national demolition under the Biden autopen, the newly elected 47th President was poised to keep his promises and fulfill his mandate.

President Trump had the opportunity to stop the federal government’s leftward push, steer the government back in the right direction, and make significant and lasting progress in that new direction. That third point is the most critical. Indeed, without permanent change, President Trump’s historic election – and this nation’s generational opportunity to course-correct – will turn out to have been nothing more than a momentary pause in America’s long-term decline.

Yet inexplicably, the Trump Administration has failed to take even basic steps to effect permanent change. For example, the Administration often has taken the easy path of using temporary Executive Orders rather than insisting on permanent legislation. Of course, Executive Orders are temporary, and can be undone by any future President with the stroke of a pen.

…

But why would the Bondi DOJ work so hard to prevent lasting victories in court for Trump Coalition interests? Indeed, with DOJ friends like that, who needs enemies? If the Bondi DOJ’s hostility to the groups that made up the Trump Coalition in 2024 continues, it will seriously damage any chance of success in the 2026 midterms. This article will examine the Bondi DOJ’s infuriating pattern of obstruction, sabotage, and outright friendly fire against the Trump Coalition and ask one simple question: Why?

DOJ’s Failure to Implement the President’s Mandate​

But first, let’s examine what DOJ could have done in service of the American people during this past year. As it turns out, DOJ has a number of legal tools available that it inexplicably has declined to use.

Pam Bondi's DOJ Is Sabotaging The Trump Coalition | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[Margery]

DOJ is a bureaucracy, even if Pam Bondi is a totally loyal Trump appointee. And those govt depts are filled with people hired before Trump's presidency, either term.

 

[Hol]

True, but she hasn’t been effective. Maybe too much glam-time on national news?

 

[Margery]

True, but she hasn’t been effective. Maybe too much glam-time on national news?

Sorry to hear it, but not surprised, given the photo op sessions she seemed to coordinate for her news appearances. Her legal competency seemed a bit shaky in some of the news pieces I saw before I quit watching the news in the fall. But that might have simply been bias.

 

[dwb]

I wish Trump would fire her.. The fact that he doesn't makes me doubt his true intentions. I want to to believe him, but things like this try your patience.

 

[Hol]

I wish Trump would fire her.. The fact that he doesn't makes me doubt his true intentions. I want to to believe him, but things like this try your patience.

From what I’ve heard, she’s protected by Suzy Wiles.

 

[TCC]

As much and often I weigh in with overly longs posts with such news worthy considerations, this here is definitely a weak spot for me. I can't really get a handle on it...lol. So the best guess is that there is likely things going on there we don't know how works. Maybe even like, "Keep Pam in long enough till the real DOJ rep to replace here comes in with guns blazing." Like something dems would never see coming and had become lax with their Bondi teddy bear sitting on the bed for show.

Maybe if i researched each incident of Pam interference there would be an emerging clarity on some specifics outside of Trump likes to be with people that abuse him. But that I don't think i have time for all of that. And may lead to nothing at all. So, yeah i guess there is one other "super guess."...

Pam does seem also to run interference for Trump. Like her hearing on possibly keeping back Epstein papers (emails etc) of previous Trump high level admins. I guess we will see where that goes. I'm interested in the Pam Bondi thing. But i am not so sure it is something discoverable. Maybe it is. But this is just how I'd look at it in our snap shot moment:

• Pam over promises and under delivers on Epstein files
• Her & Kash seem to imply that there really is not all that much to the files
• Trump does whatever he can to go to different focuses
• We end up with 3 million pages of info

I'm not sure how to understand the above bullets other than game theory. That or America just has become kind of lame or in a stupor as we can be. And we have become caricatures of ourselves. We all bozos now. But because of the massive inferential power of what is in those files, I believe their utility is for true harm to the deep state. To such a degree, Trump would need to be seen as not pushing for it. Because if it goes in the direction of being used against the deep state, Trump would need to be seen as not even wanting the files and Pam to be seen as perhaps too self focus--ee, & enough to sabotage Trump. Trump being the guy that did not want the files. And Bondi the keystone cop in love with herself. With those as optics it is easer to persecute real fabric in the Epstein files. Beyond that the whole Pam thing (and Kash thing for that matter--with a touch of Bongino to boot) does not make sense. Lest they are supposed to be bozos as some kind of game theory psyop? lol.