A report detailing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cancer diagnosis has raised questions after it was released with delays and without key medical details about his condition and treatment.
The report confirmed that Netanyahu was diagnosed with prostate cancer several months ago, but did not specify the exact timing of the diagnosis or the type and scope of treatment he underwent roughly two and a half months ago.
The document was not issued as an official statement from Hadassah Medical Center, but appeared on plain paper without institutional branding. It was signed by three senior physicians — Prof. Aharon Popovtzer, head of the Sharett Oncology Institute, Dr. Mark Vigoda, head of radiotherapy, and Dr. Shragai Gross — without formal stamps typically used in official medical reports. The document was dated April 20, four days before its public release.
Netanyahu said he had requested a delay in publication of the report by about two months so it would not coincide with the height of the war, citing concern that Iran could exploit the information for propaganda.
www.ynetnews.com
The report confirmed that Netanyahu was diagnosed with prostate cancer several months ago, but did not specify the exact timing of the diagnosis or the type and scope of treatment he underwent roughly two and a half months ago.
The document was not issued as an official statement from Hadassah Medical Center, but appeared on plain paper without institutional branding. It was signed by three senior physicians — Prof. Aharon Popovtzer, head of the Sharett Oncology Institute, Dr. Mark Vigoda, head of radiotherapy, and Dr. Shragai Gross — without formal stamps typically used in official medical reports. The document was dated April 20, four days before its public release.
Netanyahu said he had requested a delay in publication of the report by about two months so it would not coincide with the height of the war, citing concern that Iran could exploit the information for propaganda.
Netanyahu cancer report raises questions over missing details, delayed release
The delayed document omits key details on timing and treatment, appears without official hospital letterhead, and is released days after its stated date, raising concerns over transparency and public trust