These wealthy ladies were patriots of evil mullahs and visited their family in Iran frequently, according to news reports. They were not here for asylum or to find a way to earn a living.
Hi Hol. I understand. Sometimes i am lazy...lol. And i don't do the best job in wordsmithing to desired effect. Nor help it be something meant to generate an effect. I see i was pretty lazy in my prior post regarding. So it is with all sound heart and conscience i agree 100% with your points. Yes. Amen. Of course. But here's the thing...
I WANT TO MAKE THIS FUN...PLEAESE READ THE FOLLOWING AS BANTER MORE THAN 100% THEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE--ALTHOUGH IT IS NOT WITHOUT BOTH--meant!
My general "theory" is that God uses quite a bit of providence to convey. Especially to the church. This is just what seems to be going on with what i would otherwise call bozo level comic strip realities playing out before us all. Almost as if like God is into bantering with us posmodernistically. I don't expect others to share this sentiment as it is highly subjective in theory, i agree. But when I look at trends in our world I am often hugely using a filter that looks for general patterns of irony, social artifact like sarcasmic eventure (doesn't that sound kind of cool

???) and the like. Which those ladies in that atricle fit to a "T."
So, just saying (and i know this is incredibly lazy on my part), but if that is the kind of person I am (not meaning the lazy part but rather the kind of person that comes with cartoonish cosmic attitudinal sculpturing), if that is the anomaly like posture I have shared in our forum regarding (and from the place thereof), the unreasonable expectation on my part might be that i can often speak in "verbal implosure" sentiment, like. Implosure...you know, like when something "implodes" on someone? But like as a cartoon designer wordsmith outfit that just does not quite have all weather proof threads. Another way maybe to say that maybe is: Concepts meant to disintegrate before your eyes even as you might be reading them. Or dissolvable (eco-friendly) sound bites that are just there on the doorstep but never come into the inner consider-worthy rooms of the house. Things the cat is not aloud to bring inside.
Ok--now look up the definition of "Asylum."
1. the protection granted by a nation to someone who has left their native country as a political refugee
2. shelter or protection from danger
3. an institution for the care of people with mental illness
From context, context, context, sure it would be most simply said by me that I was talking about def (1). Or at least def (2). I go out of my way to state tangibles that go with those definitions, such as: "At least America provides haven for those seeking asylum." BUT -- that is kind of where it stops. Because in the very next sentence lampoons asylum as a gold card paradise like membership. So what that is doing there is suggesting that this Asylum concept is "suspect" in stated context, likely. And then kind of what i try to do there too is like a clown move. Where the clown pulls out a handkerchief from his pocket...that kind of NEVER ends...lol. And that handkerchief metaphor be..."the freedom of speech LIKE NOWHERE ELSE IN THE WORLD providing said asylumist safety to pull all the endless hateful rhetoric out of her pocket...using the freedom of speech haven to hopefully end it by supporting Jihad over America.
I know there is a lot going on in those sentences i used in that area. But I was borrowing a handful of circus funhouse mirrors to reflect back those odd shapes we see ourselves in in those things. Again, i apologize for the lazy structure, but i believe it could be argued that my opening sentence: "The leadership of America is the great satan were billionaires like Trump" -- Is Elvira like theater (remember her?). How Elvira made horror movies "fun again?" Now that is super lazy on my part, I realize. And I need to have a talk with myself. Because it drags its feet so very much it kind of undoes any value intended...my bad. Totally my bad. But here is the reconstruction of its intent:
[A] "The leadership" -- meaning the mullahs...the billionaires of Iran that often lived in Dubia or something (those of the Hamas garden variety)
"of" -- please consider how this word can be used...its trickly and super lazy of me here...but it does fit if with a billion tons of grace and pardon
[C] "America is the great satan" -- so this is what is connected to "of." The leaders of the "concept" and "rhetoric" of "America the great satan." Not the leaders of America.
[D] Those guys that call America the great satan were billionaires like the president and American mascot, Trump. We are satan in their eyes because of many things. But one huge one is materialism. Of which they are also so "possessed" by.
So with that as the opening statement, your honor, i plead not the 5th, but that my post and statement enter the scene on the wings of "absurdity." Hopefully hinting at a possible word bottlenecking event, or worse (a linguistic trainwreck ahead warning).
.....
What i do in that post after that is concede with the mullahs that we might indeed be the great satan, but not just yet. Which is kind of like eating an entire elephant as a stick of beef jerky, and while chewing on it still trying to talk with a mouth full of elephant. Saying, "yeah but even if we are the great satan, we are not that just yet," so as to also add, "You meanies." Calling Iran's heads, meanies for me to even have to go as far as to say all that.
Theologically though Hol, i do believe that Ameria likely is Bab the great in the trib. But that is the beast the great satan rides on. So even there, not the same thing...even if it ends up being true. But that is why i would see cartoonish flavor in my post.
What is hopefully the least lazy portion of my post is the overarching overture present in and of it. And i guess this would be the rarely used 2nd person writing style angle. In that post it is not 2nd person proper (like i am saying "hey YOU"), but rather 2nd person, lazy. lol. Or 2nd person "scooping." Like i am providing a huge scoop of intel that could only be stated if America is kind of coocoo for letting it get this bad. And that would be, America as a hub where people can come and use our materialistic life style in earnest while chastising us with it and celebrating the destruction of it (as long as said asylumst be granted "asylum" from the hypocritical fallout). So that would be like an overall takeaway. The overall mad mad world we live in where this is going on like that. And in that sense it is talking to the audience as a 2nd person removal of the 4th wall...and jumps into your lap tickling your chin saying, "Isn't that crazy, like?"
Blessings.