What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

In Sharply Worded Condemnation, Jordan Claims Israel Has No Right To Sovereignty In Judea And Samaria

Almost Heaven

Well-known
The Jordanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Tuesday issued a sharply worded condemnation of statements by Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich rejecting the establishment of a Palestinian state, alongside the announcement of an Israeli government plan to expand and build new communities in Judea and Samaria.

In its statement, the ministry described the settlement plans as a blatant violation of international law and international humanitarian law, saying the moves undermine what it called the Palestinian people's right to self-determination and the establishment of an independent, sovereign state on the lines of June 4, 1967, with eastern Jerusalem as its capital. The ministry asserted that Israel holds no sovereignty over the territories captured in 1967.

Ministry spokesman Ambassador Fouad al-Majali said Jordan rejects and strongly condemns the Israeli government's continued settlement policies in Judea and Samaria, as well as remarks by Israeli officials that Amman views as entrenching what it called "occupation and settlement expansion." He referenced UN Security Council Resolution 2334, which criticizes Israeli measures that alter the demographic or territorial character of land captured in 1967, including eastern Jerusalem, and cited an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice regarding the legality of Israeli control and settlement building.

 
In its statement, the ministry described the settlement plans as a blatant violation of international law and international humanitarian law, saying the moves undermine what it called the Palestinian people's right to self-determinatio
Maybe this statement should be evaluated in light of the two following truths:
 
Back
Top