Hol
Well-known
This is a typical example of seeing the speck in your brother’s eye while ignoring the beam in your own. The European Union is criticizing the rule of law in America, while there are indications that Ursula von der Leyen’s European Commission has in the past two years actively tried to interfere in eight parliamentary and presidential elections on the European continent, including twice in my own country, The Netherlands.
That, however, is a topic not deemed worthy of discussion by the European political establishment.
Last week, the House Judiciary Committee of the U.S. Congress published a report about Europe’s decade-long campaign to censor speech. As part of its investigation, the House Committee issued subpoenas to ten American tech companies, requiring them to produce communications with foreign governments, including the EU.
…
Since my party, the Dutch Party for Freedom (PVV) is critical of the EU’s position on issues such as mass migration, gender ideology or the European Union itself, we cannot accept that the European Commission – an unelected body of bureaucrats – promote a narrative opposed to what our voters demand of us.
Given that the pro-EU left-liberal D66 party defeated the PVV in the October 2025 elections with a margin of only 0.2% of the vote, perhaps had there been no EU interference, the PVV could have won the elections and I could have become Prime Minister instead of the wokeist Europeanist the Netherlands will now have.
Possible interference of the unelected European Commission in democratic elections would be a far bigger threat to democracy, the rule of law, and freedom in the West than what is politically going on in the United States. As U.S. Vice-President JD Vance stated in Munich last year, Europe’s political elites “simply don’t like the idea that somebody with an alternative viewpoint might express a different opinion or, God forbid, vote a different way, or even worse, win an election.”
www.breitbart.com
That, however, is a topic not deemed worthy of discussion by the European political establishment.
Last week, the House Judiciary Committee of the U.S. Congress published a report about Europe’s decade-long campaign to censor speech. As part of its investigation, the House Committee issued subpoenas to ten American tech companies, requiring them to produce communications with foreign governments, including the EU.
…
Since my party, the Dutch Party for Freedom (PVV) is critical of the EU’s position on issues such as mass migration, gender ideology or the European Union itself, we cannot accept that the European Commission – an unelected body of bureaucrats – promote a narrative opposed to what our voters demand of us.
Given that the pro-EU left-liberal D66 party defeated the PVV in the October 2025 elections with a margin of only 0.2% of the vote, perhaps had there been no EU interference, the PVV could have won the elections and I could have become Prime Minister instead of the wokeist Europeanist the Netherlands will now have.
Possible interference of the unelected European Commission in democratic elections would be a far bigger threat to democracy, the rule of law, and freedom in the West than what is politically going on in the United States. As U.S. Vice-President JD Vance stated in Munich last year, Europe’s political elites “simply don’t like the idea that somebody with an alternative viewpoint might express a different opinion or, God forbid, vote a different way, or even worse, win an election.”
Geert Wilders For Breitbart: Europe May Again Need America to Liberate it
Guess what the big topic of debate at the Euro Parliament is this week, what the Euro-elite consider the most pressing issue of the moment.
www.breitbart.com
