Thank you
@Hol for this. The take away is, "Yeah, right." We just got Epsteined...and now onto greater vaudeville. I think I'm holding breath shy. But if this has teeth and will, I believe it will be a lot more than Obama. I almost want to say, "Are we still talking about Obama...?" lol. So on that not, I would like to share something. When I was attending Jmacs church in the thick of it years I noticed a theme. Often when they do their church discipline, it comes with sideshows for effect. Their version of Galatians 6:1 restoration, comes with heavy dramatics.
This is a bit difficult to share in coherent terms. And on top of that, I apologize that you are kind of stuck with me in having to tell it, lol. But I'll do my level best here. I believe GCC used tricks of the trade from CIA level ops. It certainly came with hints of Machiavelli's, The Prince. Or in a more modern sense, if anyone is familiar with the movie Anger Management, there was a method in that movie used to "bring out" the man by taunt and prodding. In that movie Jack Nicholson, as a psychologist was trying to help Adam Sandler become a more meaningful purpose toward his girlfriend. That of what a man should have. And his method was to design taunting escapades to drive Sandler to the brink. To the edge, to find his true manhood. In this way, it was like the church took ministries cue's from the movie. But really rather I believe it is from Galatians 4:1-5. The way GCC saw that verse is like this: To the extent you walk in the spirit, you are doing well. To the extent you are walking in the flesh and need discipline, the church would in theatric like fashion become to tutor. Jmac would see that Greek term to picture a schoolmaster irritating a student to such an extent he pushes the school master a way by forcefully growing up. It was their performing arts version of the use of the law in the modern church. They would find a way to become a parable in your life so their theatrical presence would mirror principles in the word by which to drive you nuts...and into the "Please wake me up Jesus" loving arms of the Father. And if you grew on your own through the obstacle course, the church would see a "Well done" for their service.
. . . . .
So I don't bring that up just to find a creative way to post that out of nowhere...lol. Here is how that sort of thing relates, i believe, in what we are seeing. Remember when just before the bombing of Iran, it seemed that Israel was being ignored by Trump? Then Trump casually says, something about hoping Iran turns around with a few weeks. Then days (if not minutes) later, bombs Iran by surprise. The model we see there, to me, is likely psyoptical leverage for surprise. In the real, Iran's air defense was removed by Isreal. So that would have been a good time for Iran to meet with the US. It was an opportunity. Albeit a brief one. So if we borrow that paradigmatic approach to strategic advantage and superimpose it onto our most recent scenario, to me, it looks like the comparative is Epstein is like the optic of ignoring Israel. Ignoring Epstein. To them turn around on a dime with likely Obama indictments. Obama being Iran in this picture and the bombing linking to lowering the incitement boom. Not really sure how that helps. But the Obama charges (or leaning toward them) seem to come upon the wings of Trump doing an about face on Epstein. Making the waters incredibly muddy. Which is to suggest, "Trump is just like the deep state." And wanting that vibe to be super loud as some kind of decoy. Again, not sure why so much. But one guess from me with be that the deep state is not as much the target as the will of the American people be the target. In other words, perhaps a providential layered caked approach to be so doubtful of Trump, the Obama thing would seem even 10 more ridiculous that that dead horse has ben beaten to death already. If the American people are the "subject or object" of this potential role play, then that would mean something a lot moe than only Obama and the deep state were the target. Because then the theater would be about providence more than Obama. If if that what this is about, its a freight train. I guess we will see. But I would like to conclude this with one more layer of that cake.
. . . . .
When I was at GCC and being in some form of church discipline, it drove me up the wall. But GCC believes heavily in love taking innovative. And what part of that initiative would be for them is affording the disciplined party a "tell." Or moments of clarity in what they are doing. They were only pitstops. And sometimes seemingly not much more than mirages at the time. But a typical genre of expression imposed was often the language of opposites. Like if the desired fruit from you would be hope and joy, the theatrics would interplay with you as to have you think and feel "over the top" paranoia and unreasonable despair. But it would come with political artifacts or hints that it is meant to be understood as opposite that. On one occasion, I sat with my group paster and his two main leaders and sad something like this: "I'm not even sure if Michelle loves me anymore." Saying that because it felt like where the group was trying to "help" with both of us, what the outcome seemed to produce was doubt in her and me. So i was letting them know i felt under this form of church discipline And there response to that in private with me was, Leader A) "I don't know if Michelle loves me anymore. Paster sitting between the two leaders: "I'm not sure if Michelle even loves me anymore." And finally the other lead C "I'm not sure if Michelle loves me anymore." And each person said it right after the one before. Like a rolling wave of statement repeated. I don't know if they did, but I could almost swear they lifted up a few inches out of their chair when saying what they did. Like pop-ups. lol.
Yes I used drugs in the past. But this event happened while i was at least 6 years dead sober. So, see, the effect there is to let me know, "Lighten up. We are not making fun of you. We are showing you a mirror of how you look in the midst of an entire bible study trying to help you guys. So just trust in God. Not your feeling or the leaders. Because "We are just cartoons of ministry imagery." So, yeah it got pretty out there...lol. So much so that after about 6 months or so of all of that, I found myself making a laminated card express the language of this ministry philosophy:
* Whatever you doubt most, thrust most in its opposite to believe
It said more than that. But that was its gist. The ministry philosophy language was: "Take your cue from the opposite of what we put before you." And when i saw that i could see it then everywhere. It was still tricky to navigate. But they were the tutor driving me to the brink to come to want more. To want who and what God is instead of my own insecurities. Or self doubt. Or judgement toward others. Pretty sophisticated Stuff. And that is kind of how I see that we have been president with Obama potential indictment time on the wings of Trump being the biggest goofball with this whole Epstein debacle. It is over the top. But possibly as a parable to us more than a parable about Obama. And like i said, if those are the true chips...freight train.

I guess we will see. Blessings.