I appreciate the hopeful spirit, but to anyone thinking we can get rid of Carney in a year, the earliest we can call another election will be October of 2029. By then he can do a lot of damage.
Even though he technically has a minority govt, the balance of power rests with the NDP (farther left than the Liberals and historically they vote with the Liberals so they won't help out) and the Bloc Quebecois (and they are unlikely to vote against the Liberals as their main objective is more money for Quebec, and the Liberals are more spendy, while the Conservatives are not) So the other parties won't side against the Liberals and that leaves the Conservatives unable to bring down the govt.
So that means that we can't call an election earlier than Fall of 29.
@TCC do you remember when I posted on one of the threads we were discussing it that Carney had a deal with Trump, that was accidentally leaked to the press but only Rebel Media picked it up? He would deliver Canada and a trade deal if he got elected. In return Trump would help him squash Poilievre and the Conservatives?
Poilievre tried to get that across to the voters, but Carney buried it with the help of the main stream Canadian media all of whom are on the payroll of the govt to provide "nice" coverage for the Liberals.
And around that time Trump - right up to election day Trump kept blasting on about the 51st State thing which sent the voters to Carney, whose whole message was that he alone was able to handle Trump. It destroyed Poilievre who was campaigning on the need to reduce the debt, increase our NATO spending to what we should be at, improve our border security etc.
Strange
But
It absolutely lined up with what got leaked.
Well look for that "deal" to pop up soon if that story was right.
I'm beginning to think that Trump has more in common with some (not all) aspects of globalism than we all originally thought. Like with Covid, it was under Trump's presidency term 1 that we got the mRNA vaccine, churches shut down and stimulus cheques were signed into law as the CARES act March 27th of 2020. Fauci the guy who gave us COVID via his funding of the Wuhan Institute of Virology to create that very virus was then placed in charge AND was a major shareholder in one of the 2 Vaccine makers- Moderna!!!
Looking at the actual financial stuff coming out of the Tariff situation it lines up more the introduction of a new economic system, a digital dollar along with the proposed new REAL ID driver's license that you will need to fly domestically starting May 7 of this year.
Trump isn't an open borders globalist, he is not about destroying the USA by opening the borders, like Biden and Obama did, but his methods of making America great again involve an erosion of some liberty- that REAL ID thing, and I think a digital dollar perhaps based on gold again. It is those 2 things that line up with some other of the Right wing globalist goals.
Why would someone dedicated to freedom and liberty and the constitution do that? For that matter why would someone dedicated to the Constitution establish a new govt beaurocracy for religion (under Paula White)?
Remember not all globalists are leftists and not all right wing conservatives are against all of the globalist agenda.
The swamp in Washington exists on both sides of the aisle.
World wide globalists are not all Left wing.
Thanks Margery. Might you recall that Rebel News Article? I'd like to revisit that if you can. Thanks
On the outset of this I would just like to say that as far as Trump potentially being a globalist, this is not a new consideration for me. One of the best sources for me in monitoring this is An0maly on YT. The two weakest links for Trump, to me, being:
- mRNA vaccines for chickens
- Turning Nothern Water to the South to absolutely no effect and coming across as a hero
Those two to me are the biggst anomalies of concern as to whether or not Trump is either a) capabable of thinking outside the globalist box, or b) cares to.
So I concur with your concerns of Trump as a globalist potential. But not because of Real ID or monetary policy. For the ID, it is obviously a work-around to cleaning voter roles in my estimation. And the monitary deal is a bit more complex. Right now, we say "Ohhh like Bitcoin, and block chain and taking us away from the paper dollar." And that is about as deep as that commonly goes. But the US dollar we have right now is not an American dollar. It's a central bank debt note. So we are starting from the premise that the US paper dollar is better than digital currency because we know digital will be what the globalists will use to control the world.
The problem with that view though is that right now central banking controls the world anyway, for the most part. And we are in a central banking system that charges us to use their money. The dollar itself comes with a fee. And its printed without link to gold so it was printing endlessly losing huge value over time. Inflation is a hidden tax we pay for those that print money and circulate it too much to line their own pockets. We pay for crime syndicate money printing right now. That is our system, now. To me, that is an antichrist system because it is not for the people or of the people. Its for the elite. That is why in the US we moved manufacturing in large part. Cheaper labor. We won't notice devaluation if the same products are made cheaper. Then there is the down sizing of goods. Getting smaller and smaller over time for the same money. A marketing trick to hide devaluation. Then products are made cheaper that won't on purpose last as long as they use to yet we pay what we did when they did last a long time. All of these are monitary strageties to fool the public that the printed FED note is not losing the value it is. Look at God and bit coin rise. That is closer to the real value of the US Dollar. What used to be $1500 for Gold is now a few years later double. And "that" is not even the real value. In the dept ratio world clock gold is much higher. It may likely be repriced soon. And there it would become even more valuable.
So to me, we tend to look at things as though the space we are in today is actually the closer to God place. Paper money seems safe emotionally. But that money is pirate money. A debt note to enslave. And just like a household that cannot endlessly run up debt and not pay it, that system has a shelf life we are nearing the end of. If we don't remove the FED note, we are more doomed than if we went with Bitcoin. But the mention of Bitcoin is similar to saying witchcraft. But the spell we are under now is somehow not witchcraft? So the whole thing to me Magery is wonky. Its like we got used to be abused and then defend the system that abuses us even to the point of placing it in eschatology as "the good witch of the West." To me, all of that is a cardboard cut out of reality though. I understand its dounting. But we really have achieved a doctorate in sperstitution it would seem. Certainly it is a sign of our age. And understandable. But there comes a point where it would be healthy for us to call a spade a spade.
. . . . .
Hegalian Dialectic does exist. It is a thing. And I try very hard to give it its due. But the when it tends to trend in eschatological circles is that it seems to be becoming, to me, a gnostic form of enlightenment. Like he who sees the deepest form of Hagelian Dialectic wins. And frankly, I find that more scary than what is really going on...as bad as it may be though. Might Trump be pure and unadulterated Hagelian Dialectic? Yes. But we have tended (from what I have seen) to start from there. In all honesty, I have seen the church (parts of it) think pretty highly of itself to see Hagelian Dialectic. I understand the temptation. And if it proves to be THE HERMENUETIC for the end times, then I guess God did give us a form of the all seeing eye (meant to sound as ironic as stated) upon end times. But there have been, in my honest estimation, far more trending events that supercede Hagalian Dialectic by light years. Does that mean I am not open to Hagelian Dialectic being what actually is going on, and only or mostly or mainly that? No. I am. Its hard to maintain the views I have admittedly in light of honestly considering that.
Here is how the logic goes, for example, ready?
- Trumps Golden Age is a lie and not a real thing
- Look April had less than expected (in fact even very low GDP)
- Therefore Trump's Golden Age if fake
YET...if and when the economy takes off...those same voices will say:
* Yes, but it is a deception
It is a primary case of Cheif Facing Both Ways that refuses to be falsifiable. I am all about falsifiying my views. And I state very clear distinctions. They may be incorrect. Amen. But what I just shared up there is kind of a mind virus I believe the church has surcombed to in places. It thinks that can presume the end point and judge everything by it based on its sense of self certainty. And that, to me, dear sister is not necessarily revelation from God as much as it seems to be more like the spirit of the age hypnotizing the church. But, yeah, that is kind of how I really feel...lol. In case you might wonder.
. . . . .
So what I have been tracking from 7+ years ago is this: America gets stronger. Israel gets stronger as a result. Israel gets their peace and safety because God uses America to hedge against globalism, the deep state, bad eschatological trends, and immunity to irony.
So lets see how that ages. That was my position 7 years ago. Since then, are we closer or farther from that? Did Trump losing his presidency stop MAGA? The views of evangelicalism would have wanted you to think so 2 years ago. When I saw Trump not only stay in the race but campaign with rally after rally after rally during the 4 years of Biden and announced his bid for 2024, what in 2022? lol. It fit the exact same thing I was looking into 5 years prior. And now we are here.
Does that mean I'm right? Nope. I could be wrong any second now...lol. My views is easily disprovable. It does not hide behind Cheif Facing Both Ways views. It either is or it is not. And soberly facing that Trump may be a globlalist is something I have been wanting to prove (not disprove) for 7 years now. It may be that Trump is the human face globalism. But to me that exults the view of the church to see that. I'm more leaning toward end times in the age of grace pointing to the character of God more than the seeing power of the church. I just am. That is where I am at. I could be swayed. Honestly I could be. And I might be.
I appreciate your reminder of the Carny/Trump leak story. I would be very interested to honestly consider it. But as far as Carny not being voted out till 2029, Margery of course that may be a factor. But the story board I have seen unfold for almost a decade now would render that meaningless even if he stayed till then. The reason is because the moves Trump is involved in transcend what Carny can do with Canada. Not because of Trump. Or America. But because the issues we are facing have to do with architypes that a far bigger than what a Biden, Carny, or Macron can do. IMHO.
I may be off and seeming to think with pollyanish colord glasses. But this is the same things I thought 7+ years ago. I am not influenced by the opinion of the day on this. Somebody recently submitted a video detailing what Got Questions website was about. Its history and make up. Deep dive. It was very good. In that many quotes were taken from its principles. One was about the pretrib rapture. That quote was (paraphrased...but using one exacting word in it too): "We are pretrib rapturists, but are open to other views and consideration. It's just to us, the pretrib rapture is most consistent with the character of God." It is that last part that is exacting to the quote. That Got Questions believed that the best option for rapture is pretrib...because that seems most consistent with the character of God. I might add, beyond that, that the 70th week is what the tribulation is called. So exegetically, i'd say that is the stronger argument. But Got Questions (a huge website that gets over a million hits a month and climbing), a hugely respected and go to commentary in America for sound biblical discernment just escalated a doctrine by virtue of it "being most likely the nature of God."
Well, using that "character of God" hermeneutic may look wonky on my view of age of grace side end times. But it seems to serve Got Questions quite well when they do it. Just saying. Thanks for your kind and gracious heart. Regardless of any of this, I concur with your heart's concern. For what is happening in Canada is most certainly not pleasant or wide eyed wise. Amen. I feel your pain dear sister. Amen. Blessings.
m.jpost.com
