I wish that "unscientific, reckless directives" were specified. We are left to speculate on what exactly her position is on various things. Also who exactly are the dedicated health experts that the CDC wants fired. Are the experts doctors who are yes men and women or are they ones who will not insist on a one size fits all treatment of conditions. Are they people who insist on agreeing with Fauci or are they the ones who do not believe that Fauci is "the science".
From The Guardian
During the Covid pandemic, O’Neill voiced public support for unproven treatments that were not supported by scientific evidence, including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, as well as vitamin D as a supposed “prophylaxis”.
He also posted a number of conspiratorial theories on social media, including the baseless claim that “the name #COVID was chosen to conceal the origin of the virus. This name made it harder to study and probably slowed the response.”
OTHER SOURCE -- I forget from where:
Monarez to be CDC director on July 29, after she had served as acting director since January. But within weeks of her confirmation, she began to clash with Kennedy's desire to limit the availability of COVID-19 vaccines without supporting evidence.
. . . . .
My guess on this is that Trump is the kind of president that will make changes. But he also tends to hold on to much that is middle of the road America too. The favorable view of this is to govern for all the people (like his position on abortion--even if we don't agree). Governing in what the country actually looks like. So there are things Trump may side with toward the center or left at times. He has always kind of been like that. And likely why Susan was originally picked.
As for the firing, it would seem that she did not want to limit COVID vaccine access. Which would seem to be her sense of "unscientific."
Notice how the Guardian has never woken up from COVID hoax mode? How they would see the replacement as one who wanted to cure America so the numbers could not stack to look like a pandemic. In that sense, it seems we are heading in a better direction. No telling how long this will take to move into true American awareness of how much of a hoax was upon the people. In part, it might have mitigating effect on how closely linked Trump may seem with the vax in the first place. I'm sure a complicated hurdle overall. Although it did not stop him from being overwhelmingly elected after seeing what the Dems solution for America was. Blessings.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
