BlackRock to take control of ports in Panama Canal from Hong Kong firm as US worries over Chinese influence grow

1LoverofGod · Mar 4, 2025

President Trump is going to do business with Larry Fink of Blackrock?

If you don't know who this man is here's a story you might want to read.

By Leo Hohmamm

BlackRock CEO and WEF globalist Larry Fink says corporations must work harder to ‘force’ people to change behaviors

Our last two articles have attempted to peel back the layers of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its drive to usher in an all-new type of global society based on total information domination.

If they are successful, everything you do in life will be reduced to digital bits of storable data. That includes where and how you spend your money, where and how you travel or move about in society, your health and education records. In the name of privacy and security, you will hand all of this information over to them, you will own none of it and yet you will be happy, they said.

We’ve looked at the man Noah Yuval Harari, the chief philosophical adviser to the WEF, which has been working toward the attainment of a global surveillance society for 40 years under the direction of its founder Klaus Schwab. They hope to bring it about through “partnerships” between governments and corporations.

Now let’s take a look at another WEF power player who operates in the shadows, who boldly seeks to fundamentally transform the world through the “Great Reset.”

He is the chairman and CEO of BlackRock, the world’s largest investment firm with $10 trillion in assets, a firm that has at least a partial ownership of almost every major corporation in the world, including the big media and Big Tech companies.

So Fink is not your average CEO. He:

Plays a key role at Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum, where he is a member of the board of trustees and listed as one of the top “agenda contributors.”
Sits on the board of directors for the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which has been the most powerful driver of U.S. foreign policy for the last 75 years, to the point where it’s impossible to work in the upper echelons of the U.S. State Department without being a member of this elitist globalist club.
Sits on the board of the International Rescue Committee, one of nine private agencies that works to funnel refugees into North America and Europe, mostly from countries that CFR-trained diplomats and Pentagon apparatchiks help to destabilize with wars and revolutions. These refugees come from places like Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Sudan, cultures that don’t typically mix well in Western societies.

So when Fink speaks, the world’s most powerful business leaders are all ears. He controls trillions of dollars in investment money and sits on all the key globalists boards.

Here’s what he had to say in a New York Times forum from four years ago:
(Video)

“Behaviors are going to have to change and this is one thing we are asking companies, you have to force behaviors and at BlackRock, we are forcing behaviors,” Fink said.

Was this a Freudian slip of the tongue? I’m guessing it was, because Fink is usually not this brutally honest in communicating his beliefs.

Following is a quote from Fink’s 2022 letter to CEOs worldwide:

“Every company and every industry will be transformed by the transition to a net-zero world. The question is, will you lead, or will you be led?”

That sounds like a threat.

After receiving some serious blowback, Fink tried to walk back his comments. On Jan. 24, 2022, Fink told CNBC “I’m not trying to strong arm CEOs to adopt my worldview,” even though everyone knows he is. That’s what Fink is all about. He’s the leader of the global movement to create a social-scoring system for corporations related to how environmentally and socially “woke” they are. This is called the ESG scoring system. ESG stands for “environmental, social and governance” score.

If you don’t believe in the fake science that says humans are the primary cause of global environmental degradation and you don’t believe that gender is fluid, you will not qualify for investment going forward in Fink’s world.

According to Riley O’Donnell at Measurabl.com, Fink’s letter “carries a warning call to every sector – all of which will inevitably be changed by sustainable technology. Fink highlights the idea that those who decarbonize will be those who lead. Leveraging the power of actionable ESG data is crucial in this global transition towards a net-zero world.”

Fink is warning the world’s top CEOs: It’s no longer enough to just be a good capitalist, doing what’s right for your shareholders and employees. You must work to “better society or risk losing support from BlackRock.”

And how do you “better society” in Fink’s way of thinking? You become a global citizen first, only secondarily considering yourself an American, Canadian, French, German or Ukrainian citizen, and then you adopt a “woke” view of the world.

Here is another excerpt from his 2022 letter to CEOs:

“Capitalism has the power to shape society and act as a powerful catalyst for change. But businesses can’t do this alone, and they cannot be the climate police. That will not be a good outcome for society. We need governments to provide clear pathways and a consistent taxonomy for sustainability policy, regulation, and disclosure across markets. They must also support communities affected by the transition, help catalyze capital for the emerging markets, and invest in the innovation and technology that will be essential to decarbonizing the global economy.

“It was the partnership between government and the private sector that led to the development of COVID-19 vaccines in record time. When we harness the power of both the public and private sectors, we can achieve truly incredible things. This is what we must do to get to net zero.“

Fink refers to this new system as “capitalism” but don’t be fooled. This is capitalism in the same way China practices capitalism, with everything the private sector does being done in “partnership” with the central government planners.

This is why the Biden administration continuously beats the drum of companies “doing the right thing” and forcing their employees to get the experimental gene-therapy injections — and that includes your kids, too.

As a good global citizen under the BlackRock-WEF definition of “capitalism” you will obey the state and your corporate master by keeping up to date on your shots (all of them including the latest “booster” from Big Pharma), you adopt their radical climate agenda, which means you either drive an expensive electric car, ride public transportation or a bicycle to work and back, you forego eating meat, you live in a tiny house or high-rise apartment, and you believe as a matter of faith all the radical social justice ideas like critical race theory, transgenderism, etc. Oh, and you will turn in your firearms in your city’s latest “buy back” program.

These are the kind of “behaviors” that Fink wants your corporate employer to “force” you to adopt.

Fink popped off this week saying the war in Ukraine will “accelerate the shift to ESGs and digital currencies as a replacement for cash.”

But most of these changes in the rules of society will only apply to the commoners, not the elitist professors, entertainers and corporate billionaires at the World Economic Forum.

Take for example, the friendly advice that was given us from Bloomberg News, which is owned by Michael Bloomberg, another billionaire member of the World Economic Forum and friend of Fink’s.

Bloomberg offered up some advice in the tweet below for us peasants (those making under $300,000 a year) struggling to make ends meet in Joe Biden’s inflationary economy.

Could you get more arrogant? The Bloomberg writer above left no question about the fact that he thinks if you make less than $300,000 a year, you aren’t worthy of being a consumer of meat. Get over yourself and settle for lentils?

And it’s time to park that car. Just take the bus.

Of course, the privileged ones above that $300,000 mark will continue on as normal, no sacrifices necessary.

They don’t tell you that moving to “net zero” carbon emissions, which is advocated by Fink, along with Bloomberg, Gates, Harari, Zuckerberg, Schwab and the rest of the globalist cult, would throw 90 percent of middle-class Americans into poverty and dependence, which is exactly what they want. They want a much smaller global population with those who are lucky enough to remain to be 100 percent dependent on the government and its corporate “partners” in a system they call “stakeholder capitalism.”

Stakeholder capitalism is just a fancy word for fascism, the type of system they have in China. Big business and big government in collusion to oppress the people, monitoring their every move and assessing them in real time as to whether they get points or demerits on their social credit score.

Whereas Harari is a man of ideas, Fink is a man of money and brute force.

So when he speaks, other corporate honchos listen.

And he’s telling them to force behavioral changes on their employees.

We know what those changes are. We know the things we as believers will need to resist in the coming months. I would like to say we have years, and maybe we will, but I can’t guarantee that.

It will not be easy to live outside the beast system but we can help mitigate the difficulties by working together. We can do this. Because inside the system there will be only more manipulation, surveillance and brutal control from beast-like men in the vein of Schwab, Harari, Gates, Zuckerberg, Bloomberg and Fink.

BlackRock CEO and WEF globalist Larry Fink says corporations must work harder to ‘force’ people to change behaviors

Our last two articles have attempted to peel back the layers of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its drive to usher in an all-new type of global society based on total information domination. If …

leohohmann.com

TCC · Mar 5, 2025

1LoverofGod said:
President Trump is going to do business with Larry Fink of Blackrock?

If you don't know who this man is here's a story you might want to read.

By Leo Hohmamm

BlackRock CEO and WEF globalist Larry Fink says corporations must work harder to ‘force’ people to change behaviors

Our last two articles have attempted to peel back the layers of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its drive to usher in an all-new type of global society based on total information domination.

If they are successful, everything you do in life will be reduced to digital bits of storable data. That includes where and how you spend your money, where and how you travel or move about in society, your health and education records. In the name of privacy and security, you will hand all of this information over to them, you will own none of it and yet you will be happy, they said.

We’ve looked at the man Noah Yuval Harari, the chief philosophical adviser to the WEF, which has been working toward the attainment of a global surveillance society for 40 years under the direction of its founder Klaus Schwab. They hope to bring it about through “partnerships” between governments and corporations.

Now let’s take a look at another WEF power player who operates in the shadows, who boldly seeks to fundamentally transform the world through the “Great Reset.”

He is the chairman and CEO of BlackRock, the world’s largest investment firm with $10 trillion in assets, a firm that has at least a partial ownership of almost every major corporation in the world, including the big media and Big Tech companies.

So Fink is not your average CEO. He:

Plays a key role at Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum, where he is a member of the board of trustees and listed as one of the top “agenda contributors.”

Sits on the board of directors for the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which has been the most powerful driver of U.S. foreign policy for the last 75 years, to the point where it’s impossible to work in the upper echelons of the U.S. State Department without being a member of this elitist globalist club.

Sits on the board of the International Rescue Committee, one of nine private agencies that works to funnel refugees into North America and Europe, mostly from countries that CFR-trained diplomats and Pentagon apparatchiks help to destabilize with wars and revolutions. These refugees come from places like Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia and Sudan, cultures that don’t typically mix well in Western societies.

So when Fink speaks, the world’s most powerful business leaders are all ears. He controls trillions of dollars in investment money and sits on all the key globalists boards.

Here’s what he had to say in a New York Times forum from four years ago:
(Video)

Was this a Freudian slip of the tongue? I’m guessing it was, because Fink is usually not this brutally honest in communicating his beliefs.

Following is a quote from Fink’s 2022 letter to CEOs worldwide:

That sounds like a threat.

After receiving some serious blowback, Fink tried to walk back his comments. On Jan. 24, 2022, Fink told CNBC “I’m not trying to strong arm CEOs to adopt my worldview,” even though everyone knows he is. That’s what Fink is all about. He’s the leader of the global movement to create a social-scoring system for corporations related to how environmentally and socially “woke” they are. This is called the ESG scoring system. ESG stands for “environmental, social and governance” score.

If you don’t believe in the fake science that says humans are the primary cause of global environmental degradation and you don’t believe that gender is fluid, you will not qualify for investment going forward in Fink’s world.

According to Riley O’Donnell at Measurabl.com, Fink’s letter “carries a warning call to every sector – all of which will inevitably be changed by sustainable technology. Fink highlights the idea that those who decarbonize will be those who lead. Leveraging the power of actionable ESG data is crucial in this global transition towards a net-zero world.”

Fink is warning the world’s top CEOs: It’s no longer enough to just be a good capitalist, doing what’s right for your shareholders and employees. You must work to “better society or risk losing support from BlackRock.”

And how do you “better society” in Fink’s way of thinking? You become a global citizen first, only secondarily considering yourself an American, Canadian, French, German or Ukrainian citizen, and then you adopt a “woke” view of the world.

Here is another excerpt from his 2022 letter to CEOs:

Fink refers to this new system as “capitalism” but don’t be fooled. This is capitalism in the same way China practices capitalism, with everything the private sector does being done in “partnership” with the central government planners.

This is why the Biden administration continuously beats the drum of companies “doing the right thing” and forcing their employees to get the experimental gene-therapy injections — and that includes your kids, too.

As a good global citizen under the BlackRock-WEF definition of “capitalism” you will obey the state and your corporate master by keeping up to date on your shots (all of them including the latest “booster” from Big Pharma), you adopt their radical climate agenda, which means you either drive an expensive electric car, ride public transportation or a bicycle to work and back, you forego eating meat, you live in a tiny house or high-rise apartment, and you believe as a matter of faith all the radical social justice ideas like critical race theory, transgenderism, etc. Oh, and you will turn in your firearms in your city’s latest “buy back” program.

These are the kind of “behaviors” that Fink wants your corporate employer to “force” you to adopt.

Fink popped off this week saying the war in Ukraine will “accelerate the shift to ESGs and digital currencies as a replacement for cash.”

But most of these changes in the rules of society will only apply to the commoners, not the elitist professors, entertainers and corporate billionaires at the World Economic Forum.

Take for example, the friendly advice that was given us from Bloomberg News, which is owned by Michael Bloomberg, another billionaire member of the World Economic Forum and friend of Fink’s.

Bloomberg offered up some advice in the tweet below for us peasants (those making under $300,000 a year) struggling to make ends meet in Joe Biden’s inflationary economy.

Could you get more arrogant? The Bloomberg writer above left no question about the fact that he thinks if you make less than $300,000 a year, you aren’t worthy of being a consumer of meat. Get over yourself and settle for lentils?

And it’s time to park that car. Just take the bus.

Of course, the privileged ones above that $300,000 mark will continue on as normal, no sacrifices necessary.

They don’t tell you that moving to “net zero” carbon emissions, which is advocated by Fink, along with Bloomberg, Gates, Harari, Zuckerberg, Schwab and the rest of the globalist cult, would throw 90 percent of middle-class Americans into poverty and dependence, which is exactly what they want. They want a much smaller global population with those who are lucky enough to remain to be 100 percent dependent on the government and its corporate “partners” in a system they call “stakeholder capitalism.”

Stakeholder capitalism is just a fancy word for fascism, the type of system they have in China. Big business and big government in collusion to oppress the people, monitoring their every move and assessing them in real time as to whether they get points or demerits on their social credit score.

Whereas Harari is a man of ideas, Fink is a man of money and brute force.

So when he speaks, other corporate honchos listen.

And he’s telling them to force behavioral changes on their employees.

We know what those changes are. We know the things we as believers will need to resist in the coming months. I would like to say we have years, and maybe we will, but I can’t guarantee that.

It will not be easy to live outside the beast system but we can help mitigate the difficulties by working together. We can do this. Because inside the system there will be only more manipulation, surveillance and brutal control from beast-like men in the vein of Schwab, Harari, Gates, Zuckerberg, Bloomberg and Fink.

BlackRock CEO and WEF globalist Larry Fink says corporations must work harder to ‘force’ people to change behaviors

Our last two articles have attempted to peel back the layers of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its drive to usher in an all-new type of global society based on total information domination. If …

leohohmann.com

This is a good example of Hegelian Dialectic @Tall Timbers. Some of it is real. Good job Rose.

China is exempt from ESGs. So Blackrock enforces it on the West so China can syphon the market. Take Panama away from China and give it the Republic of Blackrock. Which in a way is a silhouette of China. My naive hope here is that Trump rubs off on Fink and not Fink on Trump. If by this Trump goes ESG enforcement, i say we impeach him for real.

The following is a Jimmy Dore 19 minute video. Profanity has been removed. Please keep in mind toward the end, Dore is not a fan of Zionism proper. But this is a great slice of life on Fink, CEO of Blackrock that runs the Canal now. Yikes. Blessings.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

1LoverofGod · Mar 5, 2025

Thinking about Blackrock buying Panama Canal got me wondering because it still won't be America's territory.
It will belong to an American Corporate CEO, and Blackrock would "allow" the US to use it.
What if Larry Flint decides to sell it?
I don't see this benefiting the US in the long run as President Trump had expressed his reason for "taking back" the Pajama Canal.
I think Trump should stick with his original plan and if Blackrock gets ownership Trump needs to take it from Black Rock and make it US Territory like he said.

TCC · Mar 5, 2025

1LoverofGod said:
Thinking about Blackrock buying Panama Canal got me wondering because it still won't be America's territory.
It will belong to an American Corporate CEO, and Blackrock would "allow" the US to use it.
What if Larry Flint decides to sell it?
I don't see this benefiting the US in the long run as President Trump had expressed his reason for "taking back" the Pajama Canal.
I think Trump should stick with his original plan and if Blackrock gets ownership Trump needs to take it from Black Rock and make it US Territory like he said.

I agree. Ok, this will certainly sound like 4d/5d chess, but on one level it does fall into place if it is strategically a soft blow delivered to China. There are quite a few moving pieces here. On one hand China's interest in Balckrock aims is not in alignment with the WEF. It is only to the extent China gets leverage out of it. Although China has a major seat at the WEF, I believe it is because it gives it advantage. Not that China wants to be some nation state subservient to the WEF agenda.

From my perspective we have Old World and New World colliding. Old World is nation states rule separately. New World is all nations being scooped up under and united to acquiescence to a global elite ruling the world (not separate Old World nation state rule). Similar to the EU model where unelected officials rule, not individual nation states. China is emperialistically of the Old World. Their Silk Road is evidence of this. Their interest in Ukraine, Afhganistan etc. The shared enemy of China and WEF is the USA. So they have similar goals. But at the end of the day, China (like in some ways with Russia), they want to be THE superpower in the world. And will play ball with WEF to the extent they get advantage. Which currently works well.

My understanding of China and WEF is the ideology and concept of moving the hub of the FED and central banking from America to China. Because the WEF is far more comfortable with social scores than the US Constitution. So in order to defang the world from having a noble sense of freedom, America could not be the nation state of interest WEF would favor. It would favor China. Which to me is the reasons for ESGing the West and not doing that to China, but for China. So WEF sees China ruling style as something they can regime change and just assume to puppettier throughout the world. If America is too powerful it would mean a US constitution shade provided for the whole world. And that would be antithetical to WEF tyranny proper.

So having said that, it is said that beheading a chicken prep is that you massage the chicken. Get it in a good and relaxed mood. Then out of nowhere, cut its head off. In this sense it might be game theory to bring in Blackrock to offset too much Chinese blowback when removing them from Panama canal rule. So it could be a way to passify China while other things are being put into place. Like China feels ok if Blackrock runs Panama Canal because they influence heavily Blackrock anyway kind of thing. Which leads me to believe there might be some surprises for Blackrock if the squeezing wokeness out of America approach extends into Blackrock. Which would be amazing. But yeah, something for sure yet to be seen.

I believe the interest in Panama Canal for America is the ability to control how transport works. For example if Blackrock wants to upgrade all ships that travel there to comply with new ESG regulations, it will change who gets through (favoritism) and control actually the shipping industry to a large extent itself. As Trump wants to bring back ship construction, Blackrock could mandate ESG standards there and make Trump their Hagelian Dialectic puppet. But yes, if America, aside from Blackrock ESG agenda rules the canal, it sets the standards of who to let in and under what conditions. Imagine if Iran controlled it...lol. Overall it would be most economically sound for US rule if a true USA desire is to strengthen all word economies for the benefit of all. That would be a power move. From what I have seen of Trump 45, he bypassed China's chokehold on the World Trade Commision by aligning with Japan and other allies...to circumvent China having too much choke hold agenda's on the shipping world trade, world. So that leads me to believe letting Blackrock passify China is likely the goal here. Fingers crossed. Lol.

PS, on that note, Trump 45's WTC move was one of the grand overtures back then that gave me the understanding that whoever Trump is, he is not just a normal human player. Because he was countermoving China globally...something a world that gives China most favored nation status...just don't do. Blessings.

1LoverofGod · Mar 5, 2025

TCC said:
I agree. Ok, this will certainly sound like 4d/5d chess, but on one level it does fall into place if it is strategically a soft blow delivered to China. There are quite a few moving pieces here. On one hand China's interest in Balckrock aims is not in alignment with the WEF. It is only to the extent China gets leverage out of it. Although China has a major seat at the WEF, I believe it is because it gives it advantage. Not that China wants to be some nation state subservient to the WEF agenda.

From my perspective we have Old World and New World colliding. Old World is nation states rule separately. New World is all nations being scooped up under and united to acquiescence to a global elite ruling the world (not separate Old World nation state rule). Similar to the EU model where unelected officials rule, not individual nation states. China is emperialistically of the Old World. Their Silk Road is evidence of this. Their interest in Ukraine, Afhganistan etc. The shared enemy of China and WEF is the USA. So they have similar goals. But at the end of the day, China (like in some ways with Russia), they want to be THE superpower in the world. And will play ball with WEF to the extent they get advantage. Which currently works well.

My understanding of China and WEF is the ideology and concept of moving the hub of the FED and central banking from America to China. Because the WEF is far more comfortable with social scores than the US Constitution. So in order to defang the world from having a noble sense of freedom, America could not be the nation state of interest WEF would favor. It would favor China. Which to me is the reasons for ESGing the West and not doing that to China, but for China. So WEF sees China ruling style as something they can regime change and just assume to puppettier throughout the world. If America is too powerful it would mean a US constitution shade provided for the whole world. And that would be antithetical to WEF tyranny proper.

So having said that, it is said that beheading a chicken prep is that you massage the chicken. Get it in a good and relaxed mood. Then out of nowhere, cut its head off. In this sense it might be game theory to bring in Blackrock to offset too much Chinese blowback when removing them from Panama canal rule. So it could be a way to passify China while other things are being put into place. Like China feels ok if Blackrock runs Panama Canal because they influence heavily Blackrock anyway kind of thing. Which leads me to believe there might be some surprises for Blackrock if the squeezing wokeness out of America approach extends into Blackrock. Which would be amazing. But yeah, something for sure yet to be seen.

I believe the interest in Panama Canal for America is the ability to control how transport works. For example if Blackrock wants to upgrade all ships that travel there to comply with new ESG regulations, it will change who gets through (favoritism) and control actually the shipping industry to a large extent itself. As Trump wants to bring back ship construction, Blackrock could mandate ESG standards there and make Trump their Hagelian Dialectic puppet. But yes, if America, aside from Blackrock ESG agneda rules the canal, it sets the standards of who to let in and under what conditions. Imagine if Iran controlled it...lol. Overall it would be most economically sound for US rule if a true USA desire is to strengthen all word economies for the benefit of all. That would be a power move. From what I have seen of Trump 45, he bypassed China's chokehold on the World Trade Commision by aligning with Japan and other allies...to circumvent China having too much choke hold agenda's on the shipping world trade, world. So that leads me to believe letting Blackrock passify China is likely the goal here. Fingers crossed. Lol.

PS, on that note, Trump 45's WTC move was one of the grand overturned back then that gave me the understanding that whoever Trump is, he is not just a normal human player. Because he was countering moving China globally...something a world that gives China most favored nation status...just don't do. Blessings.

China is not in line with the WEF at all.
China is locked in step with Russia in a Eurasia World Order.
No one can get into the minds of anyone to really know what a motive is until it plays out.
All I know is it doesn't matter what it all means because God knows the end from the beginning and He has the outcome already set to fulfill His plan that brings in The Messianic Kingdom.
I think we can take advantage of God giving us this time to continue what we as the Church has been commissioned to do, be a light to this world by setting the example Jesus has given us and lead the unsaved to Jesus, and enjoy the freedoms we have while we have them, while we keep looking for our blessed Hope that will have us in Heaven where our Citizenship is.

TCC · Mar 5, 2025

1LoverofGod said:
China is not in line with the WWF at all.
China is locked in step with Russia in a Eurasia World Order.
No one can get into the minds of anyone to really know what a motive is until it plays out.
All I know is it doesn't matter what it all means because God knows the end from the beginning and He has the outcome already set to fulfill His plan that brings in The Messianic Kingdom.
I think we can take advantage of God giving us this time to continue what we as the Church has been commissioned to do, be a light to this world by setting the example Jesus has given us and lead the unsaved to Jesus, and enjoy the freedoms we have while we have them, while we keep looking for our blessed Hope that will have us in Heaven where our Citizenship is.

My organic take would lead me to see the same conclusion about China and WEF as you dear sister. But I just looked up to see what peripheral relation China has with WEF. And there are connections. But again, it only reciprocally joins WEF, in what it can get and do. Xi seemed to recently speak at Davos, which seems to be understood that prior to that China was not all that involved at all. Which is what my normal take on that is. But it would seem in theory their involvement higher than Russia because of how China can push its weight around through Blackrock initiatives. Below are some findings China/WEF association.

. . . . .

I agree it all is in the hands of God. And that we take mostly this time to be about His work, amen. I also believe and would put forth that God's charactor and story seems to be very much a part of the closing days of the age of grace. Formally, the way we typically interact within our age events prophetically (from what we know scripturally), we tend to barrow that sense from Revelation, or Daniel, etc. So it is in that same sense I would suggest Ez 38 to be our scriptural rubric. As there seems to be a significant evangelical voice that tends to express prophecy through our understanding of Revelation, Daniel etc. Because this view is rather prominent in our day, having an interest in prophecy and development myself, I find it helpful and important in ways to identify inconsistencies where evengelicalsm might overly pepper that pot in places, I reckon.

Well just saying that keeping an eye like we do on how events are unfolding is a form of watching. I believe the plubmline is Ez 38, perhaps more than Revelation and Daniel though. So in order to keep my own head straight...lol...I offer an understanding of Ez 38 being the primary formation of age of grace end times. He knows the beginning from the end. Amen. It's just that evangelicalism does not just leave it there though and can tend to fill our head and hearts with ideas not necessary. At times there can be quite a stir of how to see prophecy. Since I see this as prophetic times though, and a shoring up of Ez 38, I adventure end times through this lens and with this edge in contrast to a tendency of what seems to potentially be somewhat future events in Revelation at times assumed or pulled into our day and age.

So I think we are in total agreement that it will go as God has said and intended. And the best takeaway is to be about His business. Amen. I just see quite a push in evangelicalism to write the script as we go. So my input is meant to contrast that in general. For me, its important on a personal level because these days are great opportunity to understand the heart of God, I believe, in unique ways my previous days in Macarthur's church might have kept me from seeing. As unique creations in Him, we may each see things a bit differently. Amen. And I believe we can all learn from each other. But I have a very strong feeling this eb and flow of what prophecy to pin the tail on will just increase and not decrease as we go. So there is that. Blessings dear sister.

. . . . .

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/01/china-at-davos-2025-continuing-importance-to-global-growth/

Yes, China is actively involved in the World Economic Forum (WEF),
with high-level Chinese officials regularly attending the annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, and participating in discussions about global economic issues; they even host a separate WEF event in Dalian, China, called the Annual Meeting of the New Champions.

Key points about China's involvement with the WEF:

High-level participation:
Chinese leaders like President Xi Jinping have previously addressed the WEF in Davos.
Focus on economic issues:
China uses the WEF platform to discuss topics like economic reform, opening up, and its role in the global economy.
Dalian meeting:
The WEF holds a separate annual meeting in Dalian, China, specifically focused on Chinese economic development and innovation.
Large delegations:
China often sends large delegations to the Davos meeting, signifying their commitment to the forum.

Search

Search

BlackRock to take control of ports in Panama Canal from Hong Kong firm as US worries over Chinese influence grow