Anti-Christian Judge Prevents Mother from Taking Daughter to Church or Even Reading the Bible

[1LoverofGod]

Emily is Christian and has worked to provide a foundation of faith for her daughter, something her non-custodial father opposes. He has been described as ‘hating’ Christianity.

The judge issued a custody order that can only be viewed as hostile to Christianity. The order forbids Ava from associating with any of her church friends, attending church or Christian events, and even prevents Ava from studying the Bible, “religious philosophy,” or discussing her faith with her own mother. Ava is also not allowed to participate in Christian holiday events such as Christmas.

Per Liberty Council:

• Ava cannot associate with any of her church friends or any member of Calvary Chapel Portland.
• If Ava meets a new friend outside of Calvary and that person begins attending Calvary, Ava must cut ties with that friend.
  Ava cannot attend ANY Christmas, Easter, or any other Christian event or celebration at ANY church, including any wedding, funeral, or even hospital visits with anyone associated with Calvary Chapel.
• Ava cannot have any contact or participation with ANY religious organization (which would include Salvation Army or a food bank, homeless shelter, or crisis pregnancy center).
• Ava cannot read the Bible or religious literature or be exposed to any “religious philosophy.”
• Matt Bradeen is even using the court’s custody order to insist that Emily cannot read the Bible or teach Ava ANYTHING about the Christian faith! I wish this were not real, but sadly it is.

Read Complete Article:

Anti-Christian Judge Prevents Mother from Taking Daughter to Church or Even Reading the Bible | The Gateway Pundit | by Margaret Flavin

Child custody cases are often fraught with trying and unusual behaviors and demands, but the recent custody order from a judge in Maine has taken bigotry against Christians to a new level.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[1LoverofGod]

 

[Kem]

 

[mattfivefour]

This is one of the most egregious abuses of judicial power I have ever witnessed in the United States. And given what the courts are doing to the current administration's attempts to implement the president's election promises, that's saying something.

 

[dwb]

I would advise the mother to get a better attorney and appeal the ruling. I just don't see how that would stand on appeal.

 

[1LoverofGod]

Liberty Council should immediately take this to the US Supreme Court because its a clear first amendment violation.

 

[Ghoti Ichthus]

Either that or flee to the underground

She wouldn't be the first to have to resort to this in the United States (for various reasons)