What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

Vance challenges Netanyahu’s war assessment in tense call as rift emerges over Iran strategy

Vice President JD Vance directly challenged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s views on the war with Iran during a tense phone call this week, disputing Israeli assessments about the likelihood of regime change and exposing friction between the two governments, U.S. officials told Axios.

According to those officials, Vance questioned Netanyahu’s prewar projections, particularly regarding how easily Iran’s leadership could be toppled. “Before the war, Bibi really sold it to the president as being easy, as regime change being a lot likelier than it was. And the VP was clear-eyed about some of those statements,” a U.S. official said.

A senior administration official stressed Vance’s importance in the diplomatic track, saying, “If the Iranians can’t strike a deal with Vance, they don’t get a deal. He’s the best they’re gonna get.”

Efforts to arrange talks are ongoing, with Pakistani, Egyptian, and Turkish mediators involved. Iranian officials have told intermediaries they are awaiting approval from “top leadership” before moving forward.

 
Vice President JD Vance directly challenged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s views on the war with Iran during a tense phone call this week, disputing Israeli assessments about the likelihood of regime change and exposing friction between the two governments, U.S. officials told Axios.

According to those officials, Vance questioned Netanyahu’s prewar projections, particularly regarding how easily Iran’s leadership could be toppled. “Before the war, Bibi really sold it to the president as being easy, as regime change being a lot likelier than it was. And the VP was clear-eyed about some of those statements,” a U.S. official said.

A senior administration official stressed Vance’s importance in the diplomatic track, saying, “If the Iranians can’t strike a deal with Vance, they don’t get a deal. He’s the best they’re gonna get.”

Efforts to arrange talks are ongoing, with Pakistani, Egyptian, and Turkish mediators involved. Iranian officials have told intermediaries they are awaiting approval from “top leadership” before moving forward.

If BiBi gave his opinion on whether it would be easy to topple the regime, that's what it was, his opinion, based on his projection on Israel's military capabilities. The US has its own opinions that are based on military and diplomatic capabilities as well. Opinions should not cause friction between allies when both have a right to their opinions and private phone conversations should not be made public because then public opinions will be made that may impact how people view either side of these allies.
That's my opinion
 

The Curious Case of the Diplomatic Leaker: Who Stabbed Whom in the Back — Bibi Netanyahu or JD Vance?​


Donald Sutherland (a.k.a. “Mr. X”): "Why was Kennedy killed? Who benefited? Who has the power to cover it up? Who?"

Let’s hijack Sutherland’s advice for the latest mystery that has D.C. tongues wagging: Yesterday, someone leaked a private conversation between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. Vice President JD Vance.

And because America and Israel are allies in a hot, active war, this breach is especially egregious. If America and Israel cannot communicate openly, candidly, and freely, logistical cooperation breaks down. Confusion sets in. The risk of friendly fire grows.



To paraphrase Sutherland’s three questions:

Why was this leaked? Who benefits? And who had the power to leak it?

For some Internet sleuths, the trail of leaks seems to point to “someone” within Tucker Carlson’s orbit — with the Daily Mail journalist who helped break the story, Phillip Nieto, the biggest red flag.

 
If BiBi gave his opinion on whether it would be easy to topple the regime, that's what it was, his opinion, based on his projection on Israel's military capabilities. The US has its own opinions that are based on military and diplomatic capabilities as well. Opinions should not cause friction between allies when both have a right to their opinions and private phone conversations should not be made public because then public opinions will be made that may impact how people view either side of these allies.
That's my opinion
💯

And God hears our prayers :pray::pray::pray:
 

Iranian regime’s collapse a matter of ‘when,’ not ‘if,’ analyst says​

Targeted assassinations by Israel and the combined U.S.-Israeli military pressure on Iran have set in motion an irreversible erosion of the Islamic Republic, opening the door for regime change, according to the research director of the National Union for Democracy in Iran.

“I don’t think we are dealing with an ‘if’ question,” Khosro Isfahani said in an interview. “The Islamic Republic will go regardless of the outcome of this military operation, of this war, regardless of what the United States and Israel decide tomorrow or the day after on how to continue this operation.”

In the opening hours of the war, Israeli airstrikes killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamanei in a dramatic first strike. In the weeks that followed, additional targeted killings eliminated senior figures, including National Security Council chief Ali Larijani, who had effectively become the country’s de facto leader.

While both roles have since been filled, Isfahani said the system has lost irreplaceable institutional knowledge and experience.

“Khamenei was irreplaceable. Same goes with someone like Ali Larijani,” he said. “Yes, they are going to appoint someone new to that position. Even if that new person survives 24 hours before the IDF takes him out, he is not going to be as competent, as knowledgeable, as tried and as trusted as Larijani was.”

The ayatollah’s son, Mojtaba who was appointed in his place possesses neither the same power nor systematic memory of his father, according to Isfahani. Moitaba has not made a public appearance since his appointment.

“Khamanei was not only powerful because he was a good orator or had been long at this game. He had accumulated four, five decades of experience under the Islamic Republic. He knew the system inside out. He knew every actor. He knew how to manipulate each of them, what buttons he should push to deliver a specific result,” he explained. “Mojtaba doesn’t have that. Any other candidate in the circle of senior clerics within the Islamic Republic doesn’t have that.”

Even with replacements being appointed, Isfahani said, the system itself is degrading.

“When you remove the central part, yes, another person from the outskirts will replace him. But it’s not going to be the same system,” he said. “And gradually when you remove enough individuals from the system, then it will collapse.”

He compared Israel’s targeted assassination tactic to changing broken parts of a vehicle.

“Every car carries some spare parts,” Isfahani explained. “But you cannot turn a personal vehicle, a whole government system, into a truck carrying spares. That's the same with the Islamic Republic.”

STRAIN ON SECURITY FORCES

Pressure is also affecting the regime’s security apparatus, he said, pointing to declining morale and reported defections among rank-and-file members of the Basij and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

“We are seeing a mowing at the top, but it’s not limited there,” he said, citing strikes on militia forces and reports of desertions among the security apparatus. “The cost is increasing and the benefit is nosediving. So they are not showing up.”

Foot soldiers are less motivated by ideology than those at the top, Isfahani explained. And, now, supply disruptions and ongoing strikes have compounded the strain.

“A lot of them don't have even a place to show up to. And even when they do, even when they do, the regime doesn't have the capacity to give them money, food and water,” Isfahani said.

"Many calculate whether it is worth risking their lives for a regime that might fall. Some commanders have deserted their military posts and soldiers, knowing that the bases could be hit by the U.S. and Israeli airstrikes, sleep outside the base at night and return during the day."

CULMINATION OF DECADES OF PROTESTS

Isfahani said the societal unrest in Iran and protests that were brutally quashed in January represent a culmination of decades of resistance, not a sudden phenomena.

“Since the inception of this regime, Iranians have been fighting it,” he said, listing protest movements from 1979 to recent uprisings. “We are dealing with a population that, over the decades, has demonstrated that it doesn’t want the Islamic Republic.”

“We have been marching against this regime. We are going to keep marching,” he said.

He added that public sentiment has shifted away from religious governance.

“The majority of Iranians don’t want a religious state, don’t want an Islamic Republic,” he said. “The Islamic Republic has been an enemy of life for the past five decades and it’s going to be reduced to a blip in our long, long history.”

FUTURE VISION

Isfahani said the National Union for Democracy in Iran (NUFDI) was established to counter the Islamic Republic's lobbying and influence efforts in the West including the promotion of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and sympathetic media coverage.

NUFDI supports exiled Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi to lead a post-regime vision centered on secular democracy and reintegration with the global community.

“We finally have reached the point that we have a leader that we trust,” he said.

He believes that is also the will of the Iranian people.

“On January 8th and 9th… according to intelligence that we have received from reliable sources, millions of Iranians were on the street chanting this man's name. It was very clear who they were, why they came out, who were they were supporting. And that was unprecedented,” he said.

“He has a deep sense of decency. And what we need in Iran is making Iran decent again,” Isfahani said.

Pahlavi’s leadership would stand in direct contrast to the brutality of the current regime, Isfahani said.

“We have been dealing with a bunch of thugs that have occupied my homeland for all these years, that have killed and raped and tortured my nation,” he said. “And finally, we have hope in a leader that has decency, is kind, is generous, and has a very clear vision for the future of Iran.”

 

The Curious Case of the Diplomatic Leaker: Who Stabbed Whom in the Back — Bibi Netanyahu or JD Vance?​


Donald Sutherland (a.k.a. “Mr. X”): "Why was Kennedy killed? Who benefited? Who has the power to cover it up? Who?"

Let’s hijack Sutherland’s advice for the latest mystery that has D.C. tongues wagging: Yesterday, someone leaked a private conversation between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. Vice President JD Vance.

And because America and Israel are allies in a hot, active war, this breach is especially egregious. If America and Israel cannot communicate openly, candidly, and freely, logistical cooperation breaks down. Confusion sets in. The risk of friendly fire grows.



To paraphrase Sutherland’s three questions:

Why was this leaked? Who benefits? And who had the power to leak it?

For some Internet sleuths, the trail of leaks seems to point to “someone” within Tucker Carlson’s orbit — with the Daily Mail journalist who helped break the story, Phillip Nieto, the biggest red flag.

Anyone who would leak this has an agenda, and that agenda would likely want to show the administration in a negative way. Therefore, IMO, what was leaked was likely not an accurate account of what transpired on the call, and was out of context for the entire call.
 
Anyone who would leak this has an agenda, and that agenda would likely want to show the administration in a negative way. Therefore, IMO, what was leaked was likely not an accurate account of what transpired on the call, and was out of context for the entire call.
Or, visa versa. An agenda to make Israel look bad, taking into consideration from the article Hollie posted:


"Why was this leaked? Who benefits? And who had the power to leak it?

For some Internet sleuths, the trail of leaks seems to point to “someone” within Tucker Carlson’s orbit — with the Daily Mail journalist who helped break the story, Phillip Nieto, the biggest red flag."

Tucker Carlson, along with other's on the "right", have seemingly made it an agenda to make Israel look bad with antisemitic comments disguised as making about "America First".
And left leaning media like the Daily Mail would take up such a "leaked" story to keep the agenda going. It is of no surprise that Israel would be center of global antisemitism in these last days because it has to come to fulfillment of Zechariah 12 which will lead Israel to fall for making the covenant of death with Antichrist.

2 “Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of drunkenness to all the surrounding peoples. Judah will be besieged, as well as Jerusalem.
3 On that day, when all the nations of the earth gather against her, I will make Jerusalem a heavy stone for all the peoples; all who would heave it away will be severely injured"
Zechariah 12:2-3

"Your covenant with death will be annulled, And your agreement with Sheol will not stand; When the overflowing scourge passes through, Then you will be trampled down by it."
Isaiah 28:18

"Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week; But in the middle of the week He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering. And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate, Even until the consummation, which is determined, Is poured out on the desolate.”
Daniel 9:27
 
Back
Top