Ok so this is just my take. And not one of those posts steeped in fact. I say that because of a conversation I had a while back with one of our forum members on Kristi Noam. I liked Kristi and what she did curing COVID for South Dekota. But she did seem to have interests in green agenda money that aided her more than the people she governed. And no matter how I tried to slice it, I must admit, unless Kristi is not too bright, she bears the earmarks of a politician that can be bought. Not happy with that. So hope she changes her tune on that. Now that is something i'd like to see a flip-flop on. Amen.
However, as far as Tulsi, I do have a take on this aside from perhaps some of the helpful ingredients regarding FISA. And this will be about as controversial as it gets I imagine. Not knowing how things will play out exactly in our near future, is an open forum for all of us to yet witness. Amen. But in and of itself, if FISA were in responsible hands, I think a lot of good can be done with it. The problem is, can it ever really be in responsible hands? This is good to consider soberly. Amen.
Having said that, and hopeful to have provided some level of context as it relates hopefully to some degree that when I say what I am going to say it not be understood as too crazy...lol. I honestly do try to weigh many levels of issues to best see what is most important about any of them. And where my own ideologies may favor this or that view...I do try to hold my own ideological feet to the hottest and best fire I can find. But in my own ideology I am not looking to be my own echo chamber. I would only want my convictions to have relevance if they have relevance. And since they are of strange measure, it will be on me to double check myself. Because I have not found anyone else who shares my views to the degree I have them. So I would just ask that my observation here be taken in this context. Thanks
. . . . .
DISCLAIMER I am saying the following as a general address in contrast to an ideology that is included with concerns of this magnititude. The things stated below are not meant to be taken as differences we can have on levels of concerns we do have in how public office may differ in perspectives within our hearts. But the address below is meant purely in relation to where I believe the constructs of idealogical differences that from which emerge concerns. Not that we should not have them. For any concerns that are not of the garden variety that stem from Hageleian Dialectic ideology, to those personal differences we may political or religousoly hold, amen. These are differences we can discuss and differ with. And we are not the brighter for having one view over the other because these are, regarldess how we slice it, difficul times to Discern, amen. But in order to highliht where to me it strikes like some core elements of concerns in this particular issue with Tulsi resdies deeply within a Hagelian Dialectic paradigm, I mean to aim my language and points at the ideological problems consdistent within them. Outside of left right same birdism...amen...we can disagree in naunce and variation. But the loaded language below is aimed at highlighting the troubled waters of holding Hagelian Dialectic thought too cozy like a teddy bear. I believe it has its place, amen. But that place is not on our bed snuggling up against us. Throughout the night. Just saying...Blessings in advance.
. . . . .
I believe Tulsi may see some things that are actually helpful regarding FISA. However, the irony here is that FISA works both ways. By that I don't mean that the Trump admin should use FISA to spy on its political opponents. For political warfare purposes. But what I would think to be to some degree obvious (less so for those holding Hagelian Dialectic to some high degree) is that a very large portion of Trump opposition just happens to be globalist minded or out right in line with criminal political syndicates. Using American dollars to fund agencies that exist so we have money on the books going somewhere. Meanwhile crime syndicates use agencies to pay salaries of people that just want to be on the payroll and have money for nothing. Only this is now more the norm in government than the exception. That is the state of our affairs.
It still can come to shock some these days that basically America is the globalist empire of the world. Exceeding even the European Union because of financial power and influence worldwide. So we get a cat like Biden to be a puppet face for the crime syndicate and there is wide spread globalist damage done all over the place. To such a degree that much of the country is under the function of the political Mafia. That may sound extreme. But it actually has become the norm. Symptoms of this is DEI becoming policy enough to escort generations into political offices under its policies. In other words, "Don't hire the best, hire under criteria that can be controlled from other measurements. And get those people who don't know what they are doing because we want them that way. That way they can be controlled. Those who knows what they are doing can reasonably disagree. Those that don't can easily be owned." On its face its DEI. At its root, it is policy to dumb America down so politics can be used to own people and go Mafia direction while it looks to the country like we have a more honorable DEI policy. And this is unfortunately just how far gone America is. Hagelian Dialectic works best if we start from an even playing field. But Hagelian Dialectic overlays two wings of the same bird mentality on top of a Mafia led government structure...while there are some good faith players that would want to remove Mafia control. Under Hagelian Dialectic ideology, this cannot happen--the permission of good faith players. To me it is the medieval mindset of the dark age Catholic approach to governance--to see through the eyes of Hagel. And end at the same place. The people are too dumb to know any better (would not be what we say in our hearts, but likely what we would go with under Hagel).
But I think there are some people in political power that have a desire to help in real terms. This is not permitted under the dark age regime theories of Hagelian Dialectic. Please keep in mind those that hold to this view are subjecting themselves to a gnostic concept because Hagel was a gnostic. One theme Hagelian Dialectic holders might be good to consider to do as an exercise might be this: At the end of the day, how is how we might be looking at politics different than new age? The end is the same, no? The end being short term gains by the NWO. For new agers its breaking free from "those who cage us in." For Hagelian Dialectic-ers its "There is no breaking free from the cage." I realize the Hagelian Dialectic concern is baked into biblical thinking suggesting the NWO and devil wins in this age scope, God has so ordained...we would see. So we go by that. And well enough that seems. But still at the end of the day it ends up in the same place as new age thought I believe. Because it makes the powers that be something we must escape or think more cleverly outside of. And assigns no potential sovereign element of God in it beyond what "we" permit that to look like for Him. And that, is not up to us. We don't get to decide how reality looks because we think we have a better grasp of the Bible. If that were true, so were the inquisitions. And so were the crusades. Just saying.
So with that dramatic open, I just want to say that I believe there is room to consider that quite a bit of FISA could be used on globalist entities trying to reroute America, own it, and destroy it. For the constitution is the enemy of globalism. It literally grants real rights that exist. Get rid of the constitution and anything goes. To not think this might not be real warfare today is I believe unfortunatley to not have an idea of how powerful the Constituion is (and that it made the most powerful country known to humanity as evidence. But if our concern is laid over with how freemasonry controls America and there is no real power in the US Constitution, this again to me is dark age thinking the Catholic superstiatious rule used on the surfs. We don't have to see ourselves as surfs. WE don't. Just saying.
So my MAIN POINT -- To the degree Tulsi might have flipped might be to the degree FISA actually is helpful in legitmately taking down the NWO. And on this note, it makes perfect sense. For she flip flopped from Democrate to Republican. Maybe that is not all that legit. But she did speak over the years very plainly. She was not a waffler for the most part. And she took a lot of heat in contrast. Aside from whatever game theory might exist in Hagelian Dialectic, I guess we will see. But for some, if the NWO collapses it can only mean by a more real NWO danger. And I would beg to hugely differ. Because somewhere in there is God. And if we feel at liberty to own a narrative for Him--that the only way the NWO collapses is because of greater one emerging, we to some degree forfeit any reason including a more nuanced sovereignty of God and tend to outsource logic to an ideology. At the end of the day, we should own our ideologies. Not they, us. Having said that, I believe we can hold much concern for Hagelian Dialectic in politics, for it is certainly real (just seeing the confirmation hearings demonstrates its ugly head potential). But we should not allow a thought in Hagel's mind of what he innocently observed how politics just normally works (that our age has perverted) and submit to being owned by it--because to us it might make for us or at us the same alligations we would throw at Qanon...but not we ourselves? For us it can become a sense of somewhat gnosticaly being more in the know (wink/wink--wink). For the children of the light are in the light because of His mind, not our own. Just a thought. Blessings.
justthenews.com
.