Hol
Well-known
In a move that could reshape how civil rights law is enforced in America, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order on April 23rd targeting the controversial legal doctrine of disparate impact — and the mainstream media is ignoring its major impact on purpose.
“Disparate-impact” liability all but requires individuals and businesses to consider race and engage in racial balancing to avoid potentially crippling legal liability.
President Trump spoke with clarity when ending this divisive and illegal left-wing legal principle: “It is the policy of the United States to eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability in all contexts to the maximum degree possible to avoid violating the Constitution, Federal civil rights laws, and basic American ideals.”
www.thegatewaypundit.com
“Disparate-impact” liability all but requires individuals and businesses to consider race and engage in racial balancing to avoid potentially crippling legal liability.
President Trump spoke with clarity when ending this divisive and illegal left-wing legal principle: “It is the policy of the United States to eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability in all contexts to the maximum degree possible to avoid violating the Constitution, Federal civil rights laws, and basic American ideals.”
Trump Signs Major Civil Rights Executive Order: “Disparate Impact” Doctrine Faces the Axe in Employment Law, Media Tries to Ignore | The Gateway Pundit | by Assistant Editor
How little coverage has this landmark action received? The New York Times managed to squeeze in a single vague sentence: “Another restricts the use of the so-called disparate impact rule, which civil rights groups have long said is an important tool for showing discrimination against minorities.”
www.thegatewaypundit.com
