What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

This should have ended this “ministry”.

Ronnie

Charter Member
This Globally recognized televangelist mingles his blood with a staffer.
It should have ended the ministry, but we are living in a time when deception is rampant it didn’t end it.
 
It didn't appear as if either of them actually cut themselves. I looked for blood but couldn't see any. I guess our @Eric Nicholas should have put a cutting edge on that knife... in any case that was a strange thing to do and I expect there will be some who are enticed by this example to cut themselves.

In Genesis 9:4 there's an Old Testament directive not to consume the blood of animals you're eating. Jesus shed a lot of blood while he was tortured and then crucified, but when He passed the cup around at the last supper it contained wine which symbolically represented His life blood that was to be given so that each of us might have life, and life to the fullest.

If Jesus would have had us cutting ourselves, mixing our blood together and drinking it in remembrance of Him, He could have cut Himself and filled the cup with His blood. But He didn't do that.
 
The term cutting a covenant in Bible times had to do with something that Abraham experienced with God. Genesis 15. Which is the land covenant.

Explained here by Jan Markell's Olive Tree Ministries: Cutting a Covenant – Olive Tree Blog

Animals were split in half (cut) and the terms were drawn up with the intent being that the one with greater power was demanding certain actions from the lesser one. If the lesser power failed in the contract they were to end up as dead as the animals cut in two were.

God took both parts by making Abraham sleep after cutting the animals. He cut the covenant with Abraham, but instead of Abraham passing thru the split animals- signifying Abraham taking responsibility to KEEP the covenant, God passed thru as the burning torch. This means that God lays on His own person the requirements of the covenant- HE keeps the covenant. It is an unconditional covenant.

And that unconditional covenant gave Abraham and his descendants the right to the land from the river of Egypt to the River Euphrates

17; And it came to pass, when the sun went down and it was dark, that behold, there appeared a smoking oven and a burning torch that passed between those pieces.

18 On the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying:

“To your descendants I have given this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the River Euphrates

Jesus own blood satisfied the demands of God's holiness- the atonement for our sins was paid by HIM on the cross. As @Tall Timbers said, the cup is drunk in remembrance of that sacrifice.

What Copeland was getting at was similar to the Catholic doctrine of Trans substantiation- where they believe that the communion wine transforms into the blood of the Lord (and the wafer transforms into the body of the Lord).

Instead of that misunderstanding, if we look at the first century wedding we find another covenant- one of betrothal in which the hopeful would be groom offers a cup of wine to his prospective fiance and if she accepts his proposal, she drinks that cup of wine and they are now formally betrothed, which is far more than just engaged. They are as good as legally married, but he then has to go to his father's house to prepare a place for her which can take up to 2 years. If anyone asks the groom when the wedding is, he answers that he doesn't know, only his Father knows for sure. When the Father gives the command, the groom goes to get his bride and the wedding feast begins.

The price Jesus paid for His bride (us) was his own blood on the cross. When we take that cup we signify that we agreed to be His bride. We wait expectantly for His appearing to come and get us as our bridegroom.
 
Kenneth Copeland is pure demon energy. It really looks like it has manifested in his eyes. I'm not one that usually remarks on what someone looks like, as I think it's tacky and inappropriate, but I just have to take an exception with Mr. Copeland. Goodness, he is gross.
 
Kenneth Copeland is pure demon energy. It really looks like it has manifested in his eyes. I'm not one that usually remarks on what someone looks like, as I think it's tacky and inappropriate, but I just have to take an exception with Mr. Copeland. Goodness, he is gross.
I actually was going to post that earlier and I thought, No maybe it’s just me seeing things differently. If it’s not just me seeing it then there’s something there. You can see it in quite a few of these charlatans. Yassir Arafat’s eyes were like that. The eyes get a snake like reptilian look. You can see it in some politicians too.
 
I actually was going to post that earlier and I thought, No maybe it’s just me seeing things differently. If it’s not just me seeing it then there’s something there. You can see it in quite a few of these charlatans. Yassir Arafat’s eyes were like that. The eyes get a snake like reptilian look. You can see it in some politicians too.
I agree. And yeah, I really do not like making fun of or looking down at anyone's appearance because they were likely born with their appearance, unless they were cosmetically modified. It's actually a really big thing for me. But I've never seen eyes that pierce quite like Copeland's. You add that with his regular energy and beliefs, and it all makes sense.
 
I can third that impression. All I see when I see videos or photos of the man is the demonic eyes glittering out. It's the eyes, not the shape of them, not the facial features, nor the fleeting expressions of muscles on the face- it's something about the eyes.
 
Kenneth Copeland is pure demon energy. It really looks like it has manifested in his eyes. I'm not one that usually remarks on what someone looks like, as I think it's tacky and inappropriate, but I just have to take an exception with Mr. Copeland. Goodness, he is gross.
He creeps me out and he looks demonic. I don’t know how others trust him and don’t see it.
 
I have looked at younger photos of him online because I thought maybe I was judging the shape of his eyes and his features. His eyes even in the younger photos totally give me the creeps. You know how every so often you can tell a Christian just by looking at their eyes when they talk to you? Well to me this is like a false, mocking version of that. You look into his eyes and recognize something but it’s not the Holy Spirit. Totally creepy. And have you seen his palatial mansion? What a wolf. Wicked thief. Sorry but I’m braiding a whip for this guy.
 
Back
Top