What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Supreme Court rules unanimously for Trump in Colorado ballot disqualification

Andy C

Well-known
The U.S. Supreme Court sided unanimously with former President Trump in his challenge to the state of Colorado’s attempt to kick him off the 2024 primary ballot.

The high court ruled in favor of Trump's arguments in the case, which will impact the status of efforts in several other states to remove the likely GOP nominee from their respective ballots.

The court considered for the first time the meaning and reach of Article 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars former officeholders who "engaged in insurrection" from holding public office again. Challenges have been filed to remove Trump from the 2024 ballot in over 30 state


 
The U.S. Supreme Court sided unanimously with former President Trump in his challenge to the state of Colorado’s attempt to kick him off the 2024 primary ballot.

The high court ruled in favor of Trump's arguments in the case, which will impact the status of efforts in several other states to remove the likely GOP nominee from their respective ballots.

The court considered for the first time the meaning and reach of Article 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars former officeholders who "engaged in insurrection" from holding public office again. Challenges have been filed to remove Trump from the 2024 ballot in over 30 state


Glad to hear the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (y) (y) unanimously to side with President Trump to not kick him off Colorado's 2024 primary ballot.
 
Glad to hear the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (y) (y) unanimously to side with President Trump to not kick him off Colorado's 2024 primary ballot.
Now, all the other states who also tried this, or were thinking about keeping him off the ballot will not be able to do so.

This unanimous decision should keep the talking heads on TV from bashing a so called “bias” court.

This case was DOA from the moment the few states tried this.
 
Back
Top