RFK Jr is telling senate Republicans that he’s actually ‘all for’ vaccines in screeching U-turn

Robert F Kennedy Jr built a following online by questioning the scientific consensus and casting doubt on the use of vaccines in the U.S., but under his new boss — President Donald Trump — the failed presidential candidate is suddenly shifting his stance.

Kennedy is Trump's pick to head the Department of Health and Human Services. Ahead of his new potential role in the Trump White House, he's reportedly been assuring the Republican senators who have to vote him in that he's "all for" polio vaccines, and that he isn't going to ban any vaccines, according to a report by Politico.


According to lawmakers who spoke to Politico, Kennedy has been telling them that he just wants to make safety and efficacy data easier to access.

This lighter touch is a change from Kennedy's previous commentary on vaccines. He previously suggested that the measles vaccine causes autism and that the polio vaccines may have killed "many, many, many, many, many more people than polio ever did."


More

RFK Jr is telling senate Republicans that he’s actually ‘all for’ vaccines

Kennedy has suggested, contrary to scientific consensus, that certain vaccines are connected to childhood autism, asthma and developmental impairment

www.independent.co.uk

 

[1LoverofGod]

I tell you we have to keep an eye on the Democrats that made the sudden switch to supporting Trump and now have cabinet positions.
RFK was so against vaccines going back to his opposition to childhood vaccines due to Autism as a result of the vaccines in children.
Now he switched back and is in favor of vaccines after all.

 

[Spartan Sprinter]

I tell you we have to keep an eye on the Democrats that made the sudden switch to supporting Trump and now have cabinet positions.
RFK was so against vaccines going back to his opposition to childhood vaccines due to Autism as a result of the vaccines in children.
Now he switched back and is in favor of vaccines after all.

Proly having some form of PTSD at the release of his father and uncle's documents regarding their respective assassinations

 

[Ghoti Ichthus]

Likely a skeleton (or 2 or 3 or 20) in the closet, which is being used to blackmail/extort

 

[mattfivefour]

I've never thought RFK was against all vaccines, such as polio and diptheria, etc (and back in the day smallpox). But he has always being against the overuse of vaccines as well as their compulsory use in children. After all, measles, chicken pox and mumps in children are rarely life threatening and really don't need to be routinely vaccinated against. It's a position I myself hold. Others don't, and that's fine. Everyone has to make a decision for themselves. Sometimes in life there are no perfect answers and you have to simply weigh risk versus benefit. For example, for me the risk of the polio vaccine was far less than the risk of contracting the disease; I had no desire to live out my days in an iron lung. Anyway, I don't think RFK Jr has strayed far from what he's always believed. It's just that now he can't just present an issue in simple black and white. He needs to accommodate the subtleties of the topic and himself weigh risk versus benefit for the good of the general public. The point at which I would be concerned is if he suddenly began arguing that the majority of vaccines should be compulsory. That, to me, would be a betrayal of his earlier position.

 

[1LoverofGod]

I've never thought RFK was against all vaccines, such as polio and diptheria, etc (and back in the day smallpox). But he has always being against the overuse of vaccines as well as their compulsory use in children. After all, measles, chicken pox and mumps in children are rarely life threatening and really don't need to be routinely vaccinated against. It's a position I myself hold. Others don't, and that's fine. Everyone has to make a decision for themselves. Sometimes in life there are no perfect answers and you have to simply weigh risk versus benefit. For example, for me the risk of the polio vaccine was far less than the risk of contracting the disease; I had no desire to live out my days in an iron lung. Anyway, I don't think RFK Jr has straight far from what he's always believed. It's just that now he can't just present an issue in simple black and white. He needs to accommodate the subtleties of the topic and himself weigh risk versus benefit for the good of the general public. The point at which I would be concerned is if he suddenly began arguing that the majority of vaccines should be compulsory. That, to me, would be a betrayal of his earlier position.

I see RFK as a politician who has the same ability anyone has to do some research on vaccines and has an opinion on some of them because of what studies have shown in children and Autism and it disturbed him and spoke out against those childhood vaccines.
But he's got good faith in the good that vaccines can do and I'm sure that's where he stands. I understand that.
I'm not an expert on medicine or vaccines but where I'm coming from in the use of vaccines is that we live in a time where evil has infiltrated every institution including medicine. I always got my vaccines every year my flu shot or whatever was needed to prevent certain diseases.
But Covid changed my mind because of all that was involved in the deception of the Covid vaccine.
Every institution we should have trusted was part of the deception.
The NIH the CDC the Pharmaceutical companies that put them out there, and many doctors that knew that the mRNA was harmful continued pushing the vaccine to not lose their license to practice medicine, while a few sacrificed their license because they cared about the patients more than keeping their license.
Greed was a big part of why the pharmaceutical companies still continued producing those boosters that continued to harm people. It was big money to them.
There are many good people in medicine but hard to find.
Too many people thought the Covid shot was a good thing and believed in the "good" it was supposed to do.
Maybe I should keep my personal feelings about it to myself but I felt so bad for so many that trusted in the Covid shot and got cancer, and other illnesses as a result of it and so many died. And now the vaccines that are planned on being developed by the Stargate AI will continue using mRNA even though nothing has been reported that they have changed it so it doesn't do what it did with the Covid vaccine.
AI is a bad thing to use in healthcare and it's taking over what human medicine has always done. I don't trust AI.

 

[mattfivefour]

I see RFK as a politician who has the same ability anyone has to do some research on vaccines and has an opinion on some of them because of what studies have shown in children and Autism and it disturbed him and spoke out against those childhood vaccines.
But he's got good faith in the good that vaccines can do and I'm sure that's where he stands. I understand that.
I'm not an expert on medicine or vaccines but where I'm coming from in the use of vaccines is that we live in a time where evil has infiltrated every institution including medicine. I always got my vaccines every year my flu shot or whatever was needed to prevent certain diseases.
But Covid changed my mind because of all that was involved in the deception of the Covid vaccine.
Every institution we should have trusted was part of the deception.
The NIH the CDC the Pharmaceutical companies that put them out there, and many doctors that knew that the mRNA was harmful continued pushing the vaccine to not lose their license to practice medicine, while a few sacrificed their license because they cared about the patients more than keeping their license.
Greed was a big part of why the pharmaceutical companies still continued producing those boosters that continued to harm people. It was big money to them.
There are many good people in medicine but hard to find.
Too many people thought the Covid shot was a good thing and believed in the "good" it was supposed to do.

I agree with everything you have said here. It is a sad thing to realize that man cannot be trusted. But God, of course, has always known this and warned us of it thousands of years ago in His Word. So, I guess we who believe in Him should not be surprised.

 

[LightOfMyLife]

I tell you we have to keep an eye on the Democrats that made the sudden switch to supporting Trump and now have cabinet positions.
RFK was so against vaccines going back to his opposition to childhood vaccines due to Autism as a result of the vaccines in children.
Now he switched back and is in favor of vaccines after all.

A person needs to say what they mean and mean what they say. He doesn't sound trustworthy as in wishy washy.

 

[LightOfMyLife]

I've never thought RFK was against all vaccines, such as polio and diptheria, etc (and back in the day smallpox). But he has always being against the overuse of vaccines as well as their compulsory use in children. After all, measles, chicken pox and mumps in children are rarely life threatening and really don't need to be routinely vaccinated against. It's a position I myself hold. Others don't, and that's fine. Everyone has to make a decision for themselves. Sometimes in life there are no perfect answers and you have to simply weigh risk versus benefit. For example, for me the risk of the polio vaccine was far less than the risk of contracting the disease; I had no desire to live out my days in an iron lung. Anyway, I don't think RFK Jr has straight far from what he's always believed. It's just that now he can't just present an issue in simple black and white. He needs to accommodate the subtleties of the topic and himself weigh risk versus benefit for the good of the general public. The point at which I would be concerned is if he suddenly began arguing that the majority of vaccines should be compulsory. That, to me, would be a betrayal of his earlier position.

I wonder what his stance is on the covid vaccines? I don't trust them at all. Fauci did a lot of lying, and should still be held accountable as well as others that were promoting them.

 

[Hol]

Anyway, I don't think RFK Jr has strayed far from what he's always believed. It's just that now he can't just present an issue in simple black and white. He needs to accommodate the subtleties of the topic and himself weigh risk versus benefit for the good of the general public. The point at which I would be concerned is if he suddenly began arguing that the majority of vaccines should be compulsory. That, to me, would be a betrayal of his earlier position.

Good insights! I listen to a podcast from Dr. Peter McCullough and I’d say he agrees with you. First, he recommends we stop bundling vaccine mixes for infants, and stop giving every infant the vaccine to prevent sexually transmitted Hepatitis B.

His primary goal is to stop untested junk, in foods and vaccines.

 

[Ghoti Ichthus]

 

[TCC]

In general this administration is DEFINATELY interested in turning America around, back to a world superpower status country in real terms. But one thing I have also noticed with this administration too is that it seems to be to some degree also in line with attributes of healing constitutional governance. On the extreme, it would be likely Trump will go after the FED and remove income tax too. Because of issues related to all that and the constitution. That is a positive for conservatives. But another factor in what the constitution brings with it would be related to what in the Constituion has a country like America ruled by the people and for the people.

Yes whoever gets into office should govern from a place of having been elected to carry through with their personal agenda they were voted in to be about. But there is something else associated with all of that. And that is to have a government also that rules congruently with "of the people/for the people." The best example of this (which may be a struggle of personal conviction for some) is how Trump ran on the abortion issue. We knew him from his pro-life stance as 45. But in returning (after overturning Roe v Wade) he ran on a more centrist abortion issue stance (relying on his Roe v Wade victory). Trump said it was because we need to win elections.

We can see that as wishy washy, or we can see that as somewhat representative of the Constituion. Not that the constitution would support abortion. But it would support of the people by the people consensus. Which would mean that if you govern as a president for the people by the people and a large portion of the country is somewhat pro-abortion and not conservative, they are a voting block representative of our country. And if representative of our country, than governing America with concern for those Americans who side toward abortion would be a rather constitutional representation of the people being governed. And constitutional representation of the people for the people may not be as favored by the conservative base because of our convictions, but from a governing standpoint being a government that rules for the representation of the nation constitutionally will not always favor the core base of the party in power.

Having said that, it is understandable conservatives might feel slighted to a degree over Trump's current abortion stance. But if government had largely been a craftsman in the hands of change agent globalists entities, getting a president who might have more of an eye on how governing for the sake of constitutional representation would be somewhat of a shock to the country. That does not mean politicians won't be politicians and play favorites or run sceevy agendas (as politicians being human will be prone to do). But in general if an administration operates to rule "constitutionally" it will not always favor the base. From what we have seen how that has been used as up till now I believe has been more about politicians in the hands of globalist shape-shifting (rather than constitutional governance). But ruling in favor of the people by the people would not always mean wishy washy. It would be in part how government in America actually looks according to the constition. I say that because it would appear this administration to be at least hopeful to be more or less about that form of government. In contrast to what up to now things have been like. And to some degree also how the concerns of the country might view such a vast difference of opinions concerning vaccines. If that makes sense? Blessings.