Reza Pahlavi Says Post-Regime Iran Would Recognize Israel, Expand Abraham Accords Iran Will Eventually “Rise Again from [the] Ashes” of the Islamic Re

[Ghoti Ichthus]

Later article time than post time due to timezone difference

Reza Pahlavi Says Post-Regime Iran Would Recognize Israel, Expand Abraham Accords​

Iran Will Eventually “Rise Again from [the] Ashes” of the Islamic Republic, Exiled Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi Said.​

By SAM HALPERNJANUARY 15, 2026 08:59Updated: JANUARY 15, 2026 10:49

"After the regime in Iran falls and “free Iran” rises, the country would immediately recognize Israel, normalize US relations, and aim to broaden the Abraham Accords into the “Cyrus Accords” to unite Iran, Israel, and the larger Arab world, exiled Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi said in a statement shared early on Thursday morning.

“Relations with the United States will be normalized, and our friendship with America and her people will be restored,” he said in a video posted to X/Twitter. “The State of Israel will be recognized immediately. We will pursue the expansion of the Abraham Accords into the Cyrus accords bringing together a free Iran, Israel, and the Arab world."

More

Reza Pahlavi: Free Iran would recognize Israel, combat terrorism | The Jerusalem Post

Iran will eventually “rise again from [the] ashes” of the Islamic Republic, exiled Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi said.

www.jpost.com

 

[Tall Timbers]

Reza is presuming he'll be at the reins or at least be involved in a post mullah Iran.

 

[Jedidjah]

Dec. 28th was the start of the protests in Iran. Saturday, the 17th is 21 days. What will happen by Saturday?
We know that according to Daniel 10:13, an “evil prince” stands behind Persia.

 

[Andiamo]

Dec. 28th was the start of the protests in Iran. Saturday, the 17th is 21 days. What will happen by Saturday?
We know that according to Daniel 10:13, an “evil prince” stands behind Persia.

Hi Jedidjah. I think that putting that 21 day time frame in Daniel 10:13 onto what is happening right now in Iran is a really big stretch. This verse describes what happened to Daniel at that time, before he received his final end-times vision.

 

[Jedidjah]

at that time

There is what is known among Bible students as "the law of double reference or manifold fulfillment of prophecy." We find many applications of this principle.

The prophets constantly spoke of a local or current event, and, without giving any intimation of a change of scenery, began to describe a more remote and a greater one, which by far transcended the situation which gave rise to the prediction. This principle might be illustrated by a stereopticon which gives the dissolving effect. One picture is thrown upon the screen. Presently it begins to fade and at the same time the dim outline of another begins to appear. By the time the first has faded, the second is in full view. The prophets often blended a prediction relating to the first coming of Christ with one foretelling the second advent. In such presentations the entire Christian Dispensation is passed over.

This may or may not refer to this case. But since Michael appears in chapter 12, and we clearly see him again in Revelation 12, I firmly believe that the above-mentioned law could also apply to the Book of Daniel.

If you are interested, you can learn more about the rules of interpretation here:

Rules of Interpretation

 

[Andiamo]

There is what is known among Bible students as "the law of double reference or manifold fulfillment of prophecy." We find many applications of this principle.

The prophets constantly spoke of a local or current event, and, without giving any intimation of a change of scenery, began to describe a more remote and a greater one, which by far transcended the situation which gave rise to the prediction. This principle might be illustrated by a stereopticon which gives the dissolving effect. One picture is thrown upon the screen. Presently it begins to fade and at the same time the dim outline of another begins to appear. By the time the first has faded, the second is in full view. The prophets often blended a prediction relating to the first coming of Christ with one foretelling the second advent. In such presentations the entire Christian Dispensation is passed over.

This may or may not refer to this case. But since Michael appears in chapter 12, and we clearly see him again in Revelation 12, I firmly believe that the above-mentioned law could also apply to the Book of Daniel.

If you are interested, you can learn more about the rules of interpretation here:

Rules of Interpretation

I understand the different rules of interpretation. Not all Bible Prophecy teachers are on board with double fulfillment. If that is your view, I respect that. But we aren’t in Revelation 12 either, so neither verse should be applied to what is happening right now in Iran.
That is “Newspaper Exegesis.”

 

[Jedidjah]

I love the videos by these two brothers. They address exactly what is written in Daniel 10.
Their previous videos are also absolutely worth watching because they are spiritually profound!

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

 

[Tall Timbers]

The 21 days was referring to a specific event that occurred between Michael and one of satan's minions. That's as clear as can be.

 

[mattfivefour]

I understand the different rules of interpretation. Not all Bible Prophecy teachers are on board with double fulfillment. If that is your view, I respect that. But we aren’t in Revelation 12 either, so neither verse should be applied to what is happening right now in Iran.
That is “Newspaper Exegesis.”

Hermeneutically, I agree with the principle of double fulfillment. It runs throughout much of biblical prophecy (something I briefly dealt with here: First Seal rider......Jesus or AC?.) But that aside, we have to be careful in rushing to presume that something now is a sorry of prophetic fulfillment by placing spiritual significance on current events. They may indeed be significant spiritually; but it isn't until some time has passed and other things come into play that we can truly understand the significance of a specific event or set of events.

The birth of Christ is a good example. It was a most significant event in history to that point; but, apart from Mary and Joseph, a few shepherds, the magi, and Simeon and Anna, nobody else recognized His significance. Even the scholarly temple rabbis twelve years later did not recognize Who sat before them. It took a number of events to reveal the truth of what happened 30 years earlier.

Let's not be quick to impose scriptural significance to a current event. That truly, as @Andiamo has said, is newspaper exegesis.

Respectfully, may I suggest that in the case of the reference to Daniel's 21 days, the responsible thing would be to pose that as a question rather than as a declaration. And then be open to an opposing point of view rather than pushing ahead with more arguments to bolster one's side. Sound scriptural debate is always more productive than picking up and running with what catches one's attention or fancy.

A sound point has been made that tying Daniel 12 to Revelation 12 actually is internally contradictory since we are nowhere near Revelation 12. And the principle of double reference actually does nothing to support the supposition that what happened in Iran is isomorphic to Daniel's 21 days. Similarity does not equal congruence. Matching numbers. names, or events do not necessarily carry any exegetical significance. Therefore we should be slow to suggest such significance. And if we do, it should be presented as a proposal or a question, not rushed or as a likely fact.

I'm just trying to bring some hermeneutical soundness of approach to this (and other) eschatological discussions on this board.

 

[Jedidjah]

So, I understand the two brothers to mean that they are considering it, but also clearly pointing out that they could be incorrect. And I think it's good that they are talking about it. I also find the connection with Revelation 12 quite apt, as many see the male child as the church.

Conservative Scholars Agree: The Male Child Is The Church

World news, Christian news, and prophecy updates pointing to the imminent return of Jesus Christ and the end of the age.

www.unsealed.org