Nordic Countries Agree To Cooperate on Deportation Flights

[Everlasting Life]

Nordic Countries Agree To Cooperate on Deportation Flights

The Nordic ministers also agreed to offer voluntary repatriation programmes to migrants along with resettlement assistance.

europeanconservative.com

Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway, and Iceland have all agreed to cooperate in deporting illegal immigrants by pooling together their deportees on shared flights back to their homelands in cooperation with the European Union border agency Frontex.

.....“It’s [high rates of crime] nothing new, and that’s the problem: it’s been going on for too many years. Girls are called derogatory things because they are Danish. Or girls are subjected to social control because they have become too Danish. A sausage cart in Brønshøj is attacked with firecrackers because it sells pork,” she said.....

.....Following the murder of two Swedish nationals last month in Brussels by an Islamic terrorist, Prime Minister Kristersson called for the European Union to increase security on its external borders and do more to facilitate the deportation of dangerous individuals.

“These terrorists want to frighten us into obedience and silence. That will not happen. This is a time for more security. We can’t be naive,” he said.....

The rest of the article amazingly calls a spade a spade so to speak.

 

[TCC]

Nordic Countries Agree To Cooperate on Deportation Flights

The Nordic ministers also agreed to offer voluntary repatriation programmes to migrants along with resettlement assistance.

europeanconservative.com

Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway, and Iceland have all agreed to cooperate in deporting illegal immigrants by pooling together their deportees on shared flights back to their homelands in cooperation with the European Union border agency Frontex.

.....“It’s [high rates of crime] nothing new, and that’s the problem: it’s been going on for too many years. Girls are called derogatory things because they are Danish. Or girls are subjected to social control because they have become too Danish. A sausage cart in Brønshøj is attacked with firecrackers because it sells pork,” she said.....

.....Following the murder of two Swedish nationals last month in Brussels by an Islamic terrorist, Prime Minister Kristersson called for the European Union to increase security on its external borders and do more to facilitate the deportation of dangerous individuals.

“These terrorists want to frighten us into obedience and silence. That will not happen. This is a time for more security. We can’t be naive,” he said.....

The rest of the article amazingly calls a spade a spade so to speak.

What is surprising to me is how the EU is cooperating. lol. Was not BREXIT for England to disinguage with issues the EU wanted to govern regarding immigration authority? England wanted that back (the right to call the shots in their country regarding immigration processing). Now the EU is BREXITING itself? lol.

 

[Margery]

Why Brexit happened. It was about giving control from Britain as a sovereign country over to Brussels where unelected bureaucrats make the decisions to affect the British people.

It was not about immigration legal or illegal. Britain has a great deal of trouble with that as does the EU, but they worked with the EU on that problem before and after Brexit.

 

[TCC]

The reason I mentioned it was because immigration is a huge globalist ideology. Using the Arab Spring to flood Europe with immigration. Similar to the open borders policy under Biden's administration. Globalism wants mass immigration to dilute country national identity. Its is easier to blend nations into a one world government that way. Instead what we see is even the EU now using planes to fly out immigrants? lol. It's just funny. To me it is just another trend away from globalism I believe occuring in ways today. As for immigration not being a part of Brexit, well, there are stances online (including the Economist--yet less than trust worthy source for sure, but still significant in reach as a standard) that would not express leaving immigration out. No doubt, as you say, there were already negotiations underway, but it is often quoted as "a" reason though.

Why Britain really voted to leave the European Union | University of Essex

A showcase of research by Professor Paul Whiteley from the Department of Government which analyses a decade’s worth of survey data to determine why Britain voted for Brexit.

www.essex.ac.uk

Causes of the vote in favour of Brexit - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The trend away from globalistic immigration I believe is still a major issue. But what that OP article indicates is some possible ways to notice (at least perhaps in its infancy) that attitudes towards immigration are not exactly as globalism would exactly want them. And as small and off the radar as it is today, it "can" underscore potentially turning tides though. Blessings.

 

[Margery]

The reason I mentioned it was because immigration is a huge globalist ideology. Using the Arab Spring to flood Europe with immigration. Similar to the open borders policy under Biden's administration. Globalism wants mass immigration to dilute country national identity. Its is easier to blend nations into a one world government that way. Instead what we see is even the EU now using planes to fly out immigrants? lol. It's just funny. To me it is just another trend away from globalism I believe occuring in ways today. As for immigration not being a part of Brexit, well, there are stances online (including the Economist--yet less than trust worthy source for sure, but still significant in reach as a standard) that would not express leaving immigration out. No doubt, as you say, there were already negotiations underway, but it is often quoted as "a" reason though.

Why Britain really voted to leave the European Union | University of Essex

A showcase of research by Professor Paul Whiteley from the Department of Government which analyses a decade’s worth of survey data to determine why Britain voted for Brexit.

www.essex.ac.uk

Causes of the vote in favour of Brexit - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The trend away from globalistic immigration I believe is still a major issue. But what that OP article indicates is some possible ways to notice (at least perhaps in its infancy) that attitudes towards immigration are not exactly as globalism would exactly want them. And as small and off the radar as it is today, it "can" underscore potentially turning tides though. Blessings.

The article basically says that these countries are dealing with a crime wave, and it's related to their lax attitudes of the past in allowing migrants and asylum seekers in. They have woken up to the fact that their attitudes are a problem.

Those would include moral equivalency between Islam and Judeo Christian religion. They see religion as morally neutral and hold to the usual idea that all people, all religions are the same and that the crime in Islam comes from poverty or lack of education.

That came out in the article.

This is the EU waking up to the fact that their assumptions were wrong and their globalist idealism was misplaced.

I agree, they are moving away from that- you can see the concern in recent elections in Germany and France for example where populist votes are going towards more conservative leaders and policies to limit the migrants from Islamic cesspools.

This is not the end of globalism, that is a far greater world view than just unlimited migration and the end of borders. That was simply used to try to break the Western democracies that are resting on a Judeo Christian world view while divorcing from those Bible roots.

 

[Tall Timbers]

It's probably too late for most of the European countries. Trump largely stopped the flow into the USA during his first term or the USA would be as bad off as Europe is by now.

 

[Cheeky200386]

About time. It’s crazy it took them this long to start doing something about it. How many women and children had to be raped and killed? Stupidity!