The Ninth Circuit has a long history of anti-gun rulings. It's only the inclusion of Judge Robert "Saint" Benitez started to change that. In fact, following Bruen, it seemed that the Ninth Circuit was actually a lot less hostile toward the Second Amendment, even when Benitez wasn't the judge in question.
But some things aren't going to hold forever.
It seems that the Ninth Circuit has decided that California's sensitive places measure wasn't the infringement many of us argued. However, it wasn't a complete win for anti-gunners, either.
California may enforce its recent ban on guns in "sensitive places" when it comes to parks and playgrounds, bars and restaurants that serve alcohol, casinos, stadiums, amusement parks, zoos, libraries, museums, athletic facilities and the parking areas associated with them, a federal appellate court ruled Friday.
However, the state may not enforce similar restrictions in hospitals or other medical facilities, on public transit, at places of worship or financial institutions, or in the parking areas associated with or shared by those places, the three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals determined.
More
But some things aren't going to hold forever.
It seems that the Ninth Circuit has decided that California's sensitive places measure wasn't the infringement many of us argued. However, it wasn't a complete win for anti-gunners, either.
California may enforce its recent ban on guns in "sensitive places" when it comes to parks and playgrounds, bars and restaurants that serve alcohol, casinos, stadiums, amusement parks, zoos, libraries, museums, athletic facilities and the parking areas associated with them, a federal appellate court ruled Friday.
However, the state may not enforce similar restrictions in hospitals or other medical facilities, on public transit, at places of worship or financial institutions, or in the parking areas associated with or shared by those places, the three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals determined.
More
