Not only did these freelance photojournalists cross an ethical line,
it prompts more questions about major news outlets’ credibility and morality.
The MSM has always had a certain slant when covering the Israel/Hamas war. They tend to report Hamas as the victims when it was Hamas that attacked Israel, hides behind civilians to protect themselves, steals from their people to live lives of luxury in Qatar, and openly calls for the eradication of the Jews. The New York Times’s biased reporting on behalf of the terrorists has already gotten it in trouble.
Now to the wisdom of using “freelance journalists” based in Gaza. This is a fraught proposition from the start. These Palestinian journalists are likely either a part of Hamas or are controlled by the terror group. They have no real journalistic freedom, and using them as “reliable” sources is foolish.
Further read:
it prompts more questions about major news outlets’ credibility and morality.
The MSM has always had a certain slant when covering the Israel/Hamas war. They tend to report Hamas as the victims when it was Hamas that attacked Israel, hides behind civilians to protect themselves, steals from their people to live lives of luxury in Qatar, and openly calls for the eradication of the Jews. The New York Times’s biased reporting on behalf of the terrorists has already gotten it in trouble.
Now to the wisdom of using “freelance journalists” based in Gaza. This is a fraught proposition from the start. These Palestinian journalists are likely either a part of Hamas or are controlled by the terror group. They have no real journalistic freedom, and using them as “reliable” sources is foolish.
Further read:
MSM Photographers Present With Hamas in Attacks. Wait, What?
Not only did these freelance photojournalists cross an ethical line, it prompts more questions about major news outlets' credibility and morality.
patriotpost.us
