What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate fully in the fellowship here, including adding your own topics and posts, as well as connecting with other members through your own private inbox!

Judge Rules Biblical Teaching A Threat To Child's Well-Being, Bans From Church

In a stunning legal decision in Maine, a judge has ruled that a mother is forbidden from taking her daughter to church--unless it is a church approved by her ex-boyfriend. The ruling has sparked significant controversy, as it directly challenges religious freedom and parental rights.

Liberty Counsel, a legal organization specializing in religious liberty cases, has taken immediate action to appeal the decision, arguing that it violates the U.S. Constitution and centuries of legal precedent protecting a parent's right to raise their child in their faith.

The case stems from a dispute between the parents, who separated before their daughter was born. For years, there was no major conflict regarding parenting decisions--until the mother and daughter began attending church together. The father objected to his daughter wearing T-shirts with Bible verses and expressed outrage when she wanted to be baptized, calling it "indoctrination."

A major focus of his complaint was that Calvary Chapel Bangor teaches the Bible chapter by chapter, verse by verse--an approach that is central to the Calvary Chapel movement nationwide. To support his case, he hired a former California State University sociology professor who characterized the church as a "cult."

The judge's order declared that because the mother testified that her daughter's faith in God was "more important than anything," the court found that "Elizabeth's beliefs about Calvary Chapel's teachings have eclipsed her ability to make decisions that are in her daughter's best interests."

The judge spent nearly half of her 11-page opinion excoriating Calvary Chapel’s ministers and members for having the audacity to pray over Elizabeth and Andrea. As a result, she is now banned from taking her daughter to Calvary Chapel or any other church the father does not approve of.

This decision has deeply alarmed Christians, as it raises concerns about how the government could interfere in religious upbringing. If courts can dictate where a parent may or may not take their child to worship, it sets a dangerous precedent for restricting religious expression.

The Truth About Calvary Chapel

One of the most disturbing elements of this case is the mischaracterization of Calvary Chapel as a "cult." In reality, Calvary Chapel is one of the most Bible-centered Christian movements in the U.S. and beyond. Founded by Pastor Chuck Smith in the 1960s, the Calvary Chapel movement grew out of the Jesus movement, welcoming people from all backgrounds--including many disillusioned youth from the counterculture.

A defining characteristic of Calvary Chapel churches is their commitment to systematically teaching the Bible, verse by verse, chapter by chapter. This method ensures that congregants develop a deep, well-rounded understanding of Scripture, rather than selectively focusing on certain topics.

Over the decades, Calvary Chapel has expanded to more than 1,700 affiliated churches worldwide. Some of the most influential Christian teachers have emerged from this movement, including Chuck Missler, known for his in-depth Bible studies, and Greg Laurie, one of today's leading evangelists. Laurie was also the central figure in the recent hit film Jesus Revolution, which depicted the rise of the Calvary Chapel movement and its impact on an entire generation.

The Battle for Religious Freedom

This case is about more than one family's dispute--it is a fight for religious liberty. If a court can bar a parent from taking their child to church based on the other parent's objections, it paves the way for further government overreach into religious life. Today, it is one church. Tomorrow, it could be an entire denomination, or a broader restriction on religious practice.

Liberty Counsel is working diligently to overturn this ruling, arguing that it not only violates parental rights but also ignores the fundamental protections of religious freedom in America. For Christians across the country, this case serves as a sobering reminder that religious liberty must be actively defended. If this ruling is allowed to stand, it could embolden future efforts to limit church attendance, religious expression, and parental authority in matters of faith.

As the case moves forward, it remains crucial for Christians to stand firm in defense of their right to worship and raise their children in accordance with biblical truth.

 
Yes, and all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution.
2 Timothy 3:12

And you will be hated by all for My name’s sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved.
Matthew 10:22

These things I have spoken to you, that in Me you may have peace. In the world you will have tribulation; but be of good cheer, I have overcome the world.”
John 16:33
 
It is very disturbing that this sociology professor’s characterization of Calvary Chapel as a cult was admissible in court. Because the Supreme Court has (rightfully) never set any legal parameters as to what a “cult” is.
It makes no sense that the satanic temple is given rights protected by the Constitution but a Bible believing church is considered a cult.
That's Satan blinding the minds of unbelievers because they refuse to believe the truth that is in Christ Jesus.
2 Corinthians 4:4
 
What are the possible ramifications for this rogue judge for going against the constitution and the laws of this nation??
These judges are political appointees and the way to make rogue judges face accountability is to impeach them.
From what I have read recently Congress has already begun articles of impeachment on some judges that are interfering with The President's Executive Orders.
This case will likely go before the Supreme Court, but even the Supreme Court may not bring justice......
But God is The Ultimate Judge.
 
These judges are political appointees and the way to make rogue judges face accountability is to impeach them.
From what I have read recently Congress has already begun articles of impeachment on some judges that are interfering with The President's Executive Orders.
This case will likely go before the Supreme Court, but even the Supreme Court may not bring justice......
But God is The Ultimate Judge.
I went down a rabbit hole of other judges that have committed atrocious rulings and how most of them faced no justice. My husband expressed anger over the amount of power judges have in this country and at this story in particular. His immediate thought was that this is a ruling one must violate.
 
Our founding Fathers experienced or knew of those experiencing this very thing in Britain, where the govorment told people which Christian church they could or could not attend. We know the context is Christian as Creator and several 'year of our Lord' endings of these various writings are contained in the constitutional documents. The Lord widely revered at the time of these documents was non other than Jesus Christ Himself, of the Bible.

Thus the separation of church and state in our constitution, that is, governing bodies of our country cannot dictate to people which Christian church they are 'allowed' to attend....the true Constitutional definition of separation of church and state by the way.

As I read about this incident, I'm struck that this is a spiritual in nature situation. This is a battle that needs to be won on our knees as we pray for the judge to come to Christ and for God's capable help in this situation and those like it, possibly through legal entities already involved.

:pray:
 
Our founding Fathers experienced or knew of those experiencing this very thing in Britain, where the govorment told people which Christian church they could or could not attend. We know the context is Christian as Creator and several 'year of our Lord' endings of these various writings are contained in the constitutional documents. The Lord widely revered at the time of these documents was non other than Jesus Christ Himself, of the Bible.

Thus the separation of church and state in our constitution, that is, governing bodies of our country cannot dictate to people which Christian church they are 'allowed' to attend....the true Constitutional definition of separation of church and state by the way.

As I read about this incident, I'm struck that this is a spiritual in nature situation. This is a battle that needs to be won on our knees as we pray for the judge to come to Christ and for God's capable help in this situation and those like it, possibly through legal entities already involved.

:pray:
We have only One Righteous Judge in Christ Jesus and because He died for the world we ought to pray that these who defy God's Laws repent and come to Christ for salvation 🙏
 
I went down a rabbit hole of other judges that have committed atrocious rulings and how most of them faced no justice. My husband expressed anger over the amount of power judges have in this country and at this story in particular. His immediate thought was that this is a ruling one must violate.

We must be Acts 5:29/Joshua 24:15 Christians.


Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.
Acts 5:29, KJV

And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.
Joshua 24:15, KJV


:pray: :pray: :amen: :amen: :thankyou: :thankyou:
 
Back
Top