What's new
Christian Community Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Iran’s supreme leader calls for global ‘military coalition’ against Israel

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Sunday called for a global “military coalition” against Israel, as other top officials in Tehran vowed that Jerusalem will pay a price for its weekend airstrikes against key Iranian military sites.

The strong rhetoric from Ayatollah Khamenei comes at a pivotal moment in the long-simmering Israel-Iran military tensions, which have spilled into direct conflict on several occasions this month and threaten to drag the Mideast into a wider, more deadly conflict.

The supreme leader’s comments also reflect Iran’s growing alliances with China, Russia and North Korea, all leading U.S. adversaries, and might suggest that Tehran believes those autocratic allies will ultimately stand with it against Israel.

“A global coalition must be formed, as well as a political coalition, an economic coalition, and, if necessary, a military coalition, against the malicious Zionist regime that is committing the most brutal war crimes today,” the ayatollah said, according to Iranian state-controlled media, presumably referring to Israel’s military campaign against Hamas in the Gaza Strip and its attacks against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

More

 
Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Sunday called for a global “military coalition” against Israel,
Of course he calls for help because there is no chance Iran could expect to inflict real damage with their weak military limited capabilities.

I often wonder what is said behind closed doors or in secure comm lines between Iran and Israel. Israel could of told Iran “this past strike was limited to your military targets and if you so foolishly attack us, no target to include Oil refineries or nuke site will be exempt”.
 
Of course he calls for help because there is no chance Iran could expect to inflict real damage with their weak military limited capabilities.

I often wonder what is said behind closed doors or in secure comm lines between Iran and Israel. Israel could of told Iran “this past strike was limited to your military targets and if you so foolishly attack us, no target to include Oil refineries or nuke site will be exempt”.
Israel will destroy Iran's Nuclear facilities when God's judgement on Elam happens. Jeremiah 49.
The destruction of Elam's "bow" is the source from which Iran could launch it's Nuclear missiles from which happen to be located in the area of ancient Elam. Because this prophecy is likely to occur before Ezekiel 38, we may See 👀 this prophecy fulfilled.

“Thus says the Lord of hosts:

‘Behold, I will break the bow of Elam,
The foremost of their might."
Jeremiah 49:35
 
Thats an assumption on your part.
Not an assumption on my part. I've listened to the reasoning behind it and it makes sense. It's not an accident that Iran has it's nuclear facilities in the Elam area and as the prophecy points out it's "the Foremost of their might". What other foremost of might militarily would Iran have other than their nuclear facilities? It just makes sense.
 
Not an assumption on my part. I've listened to the reasoning behind it and it makes sense. It's not an accident that Iran has it's nuclear facilities in the Elam area and as the prophecy points out it's "the Foremost of their might". What other foremost of might militarily would Iran have other than their nuclear facilities? It just makes sense.
I did not say its a bad assumption, but you are using prophecy in scripture that has yet to be fulfilled so it is speculation, or an assumption.

We all speculate, and believe we are in the final season. However, we really can only make these assumptions based on whats happening now. The tensions in the middle east could die down, or Israel continues on destroying all her neighboring enemies, thus leading to living in a time of security. How long will Israel live in unwalled villages?

We all have to consider the possibility we could be decades away from being called Home. I personally believe we are very close, but my opinion and 7 dollars might buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks.
 
The coalition will come to pass at some point, but probably not until Russia is done in Ukraine.
The coalition will come to pass in the Lord’s perfect timing and when both the opportunity (excuse) and price (reward) is irresistibly presented. Sufficient even for Russia to shift its focus from Ukraine. They WILL take the bait.

Ezekiel 38:3-4
“…..Behold, I am against you, O Gog, chief prince of Meshech and Tubal. I will turn you around, put hooks in your jaws, and bring you out with all your army”
 
I did not say its a bad assumption, but you are using prophecy in scripture that has yet to be fulfilled so it is speculation, or an assumption.

We all speculate, and believe we are in the final season. However, we really can only make these assumptions based on whats happening now. The tensions in the middle east could die down, or Israel continues on destroying all her neighboring enemies, thus leading to living in a time of security. How long will Israel live in unwalled villages?

We all have to consider the possibility we could be decades away from being called Home. I personally believe we are very close, but my opinion and 7 dollars might buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks.
or 7 eleven LOL
 
I did not say its a bad assumption, but you are using prophecy in scripture that has yet to be fulfilled so it is speculation, or an assumption.

We all speculate, and believe we are in the final season. However, we really can only make these assumptions based on whats happening now. The tensions in the middle east could die down, or Israel continues on destroying all her neighboring enemies, thus leading to living in a time of security. How long will Israel live in unwalled villages?

We all have to consider the possibility we could be decades away from being called Home. I personally believe we are very close, but my opinion and 7 dollars might buy a cup of coffee at Starbucks.
I'm sorry I gave my opinion. 🤷
I don't mean to seem like I'm being argumentive. I'm not. But I just want to explain something.
I think any view or theory of what may happen in any unfulfilled prophecy can't be really known until it happens. It can be called assumptions or speculation. We could say that for anything we hear from prophecy teachers or from our own theories we make out of our studying prophecy that hasn't happened yet.
There are comments on multiple threads on prophecy here. If the prophecies are unfulfilled then all of us are making assumptions.
In my comment that I made I said my view on it was "from what I have listened to and it made sense to me". It is a theory from another source that I just agreed with because it makes sense.
But I still didn't say it was a fact to happen that way, but I carefully made sure to use the word likely and I put the word likely in parentheses, to emphasize it so it wouldn't seem like I was making it a fact. I thought it was clear.
To make a point other threads here on unfulfilled prophecy have questions posed like
What happens a second after the Rapture? Or before the Rapture? Everyone gives their opinions and it can be said for every opinion someone makes that it's assumption.
I don't have a degree in eschatology so I listen to those who do, and if it makes sense I can agree, and if a topic arises on it I give my opinion. If prophecy is unfulfilled, it's still a theory or an opinion, not fact, and I understand that, and is why I said "likely" in my comment.
I think it's important to comment on a way to not make it appear as fact unless evidence can be produced.
I don't want to give the impression that I know anything. I don't. If I give my opinion it usually comes from another source. I could be wrong. The sources I use can be wrong. But if I do give my opinion I won't insist that it's a fact because I don't know, certainly because it hasn't happened yet.
I try to choose words carefully when I comment, and is why I put the word likely in parentheses and why I said it made sense when I heard it. That's all. Please don't take offense to my response to your comment. I just wanted to clarify that my opinion was just that, an opinion, taken from another source that made sense to me.
I didn't mean for it appear as if I made my comment a fact, I didn't intend for it to appear that way. 🫂❤️
 
I'm sorry I gave my opinion. 🤷
I don't mean to seem like I'm being argumentive. I'm not. But I just want to explain something.
I think any view or theory of what may happen in any unfulfilled prophecy can't be really known until it happens. It can be called assumptions or speculation. We could say that for anything we hear from prophecy teachers or from our own theories we make out of our studying prophecy that hasn't happened yet.
There are comments on multiple threads on prophecy here. If the prophecies are unfulfilled then all of us are making assumptions.
In my comment that I made I said my view on it was "from what I have listened to and it made sense to me". It is a theory from another source that I just agreed with because it makes sense.
But I still didn't say it was a fact to happen that way, but I carefully made sure to use the word likely and I put the word likely in parentheses, to emphasize it so it wouldn't seem like I was making it a fact. I thought it was clear.
To make a point other threads here on unfulfilled prophecy have questions posed like
What happens a second after the Rapture? Or before the Rapture? Everyone gives their opinions and it can be said for every opinion someone makes that it's assumption.
I don't have a degree in eschatology so I listen to those who do, and if it makes sense I can agree, and if a topic arises on it I give my opinion. If prophecy is unfulfilled, it's still a theory or an opinion, not fact, and I understand that, and is why I said "likely" in my comment.
I think it's important to comment on a way to not make it appear as fact unless evidence can be produced.
I don't want to give the impression that I know anything. I don't. If I give my opinion it usually comes from another source. I could be wrong. The sources I use can be wrong. But if I do give my opinion I won't insist that it's a fact because I don't know, certainly because it hasn't happened yet.
I try to choose words carefully when I comment, and is why I put the word likely in parentheses and why I said it made sense when I heard it. That's all. Please don't take offense to my response to your comment. I just wanted to clarify that my opinion was just that, an opinion, taken from another source that made sense to me.
I didn't mean for it appear as if I made my comment a fact, I didn't intend for it to appear that way. 🫂❤️
I only made my comment because you said “Israel will destroy Iran's Nuclear facilities when God's judgement on Elam happens. Jeremiah 49.”

Agree, all of us when posting about prophecy yet fulfilled are speculating.
 
Back
Top